Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
ARTICLEPrediction of Major Depression and Dysthymia From CES-D Scores Among Ethnic Minority Adolescents
REFERENCES (28)
- et al.
Analysis of effects of sex and age in response to items of the CES-D scale
Psychiatry Res
(1981) - et al.
The CES-D as a screen for depression and other psychiatric disorders in adolescents
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1991) - et al.
A longitudinal study of depressive symptomatology in young adolescents
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1990) - et al.
Abuses of the MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale: a critical review
Clin Psychol Rev
(1989) - et al.
The factor structure of the CES-D in the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: the influences of ethnicity, gender and language
Soc Sci Med
(1989) Reliability of the CES-D scale in different contexts
Psychiatry Res
(1980)- et al.
Screening for adolescent depression: a comparison of depression scales
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1991) - et al.
Criterion validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3)
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in a population sample from an American Indian village
Psychiatry Res
(1993)
A binational school survey of depressive symptoms, drug use, and suicidal ideation
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Factor analysis and AIC
Psychometrika
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Factorial structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale among American Indian college students
Psychol Assess
Cited by (111)
Digital engagement and adolescent depression: A longitudinal mediation analysis adjusting for selection
2023, Computers in Human Behavior ReportsA single-arm pilot study of a mobile health exercise intervention (GO-EXCAP) in older patients with myeloid neoplasms
2022, Blood AdvancesCitation Excerpt :After obtaining informed consent (verbal or written), patients completed demographics and baseline measures. A geriatric assessment (eg, physical function, comorbidity, social support, nutritional status, cognition, and psychological health) was performed using self-administered questionnaires or objective tests to characterize vulnerabilities in this population (Table 1).23,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39 Patients also completed questionnaires to assess fatigue and quality of life.
Relationships between stuttering, depression, and suicidal ideation in young adults: Accounting for gender differences
2021, Journal of Fluency DisordersDevelopment of a dual school climate and school identification measure–student (SCASIM-St)
2017, Contemporary Educational PsychologySymptom screening scales for detecting major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic utility
2015, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :Metaregression showed that sample type (clinical vs. nonclinical; t(1, 7)=0.08, p=0.93, R2<0), sample age (child vs. adolescent; t(1, 7)=0.80, p=0.45, R2<0) risk of bias quality score (t(1, 7)=1.71, p=0.13, R2=18.04%) and cutpoint used (t(1, 7)=0.70, p=0.51, R2<0) did not significantly affect the sensitivity values on the CES-D. Similar results were found for specificity, with no impact of sample type (t(1, 7)=0.12, p=0.91, R2<0), age (t(1, 7)=1.36, p=0.21, R2=12.69%), risk of bias quality score (t(1, 7)=0.77, p=0.46, R2<0) or cutpoint used (t(1, 7)=2.12, p=0.07, R2=32.62%). Five studies (six data points) examined the PPV and NPV of the CES-D, with only one study conducted among a clinical sample (Logsdon and Myers, 2010), and the remainder in nonclinical samples (Fendrich et al., 1990; Garrison et al., 1991; Logsdon and Myers, 2010; Prescott et al., 1998; Roberts et al., 1991). PPV was low overall, with values of 0.08 (Roberts et al., 1991), 0.15 (Fendrich et al., 1990), 0.16 (Garrison et al., 1991), 0.24 (Prescott et al., 1998), 0.25 (Logsdon and Myers, 2010) and 0.32 (Garrison et al., 1991).
Supported by NIH grants GM-08125, MH-5015, RR0361-S1, AA-09095, and MHIAA-59492 and the Queen Emma Foundation.