ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Sensitivity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, 2nd Edition (DISC-2.1) for Specific Diagnoses of Children and Adolescents

https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199305000-00026Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The sensitivity of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, second edition (DISC-2.1) was examined for certain “rare‘’ disorders: eating disorders, major depressive episode, obsessive compulsive disorder, psychosis, tic disorders, and substance use disorders.

Method

Subjects recruited from specialized centers were interviewed with the DISC-2.1; the centers' diagnoses served as the criterion measure.

Result

Overall the DISC showed good to excellent sensitivity (range = 0.73 to 1.0). Used alone, the DISC-P (parent interview) was generally more sensitive than the DISC-C (child interview). Areas for additional instrument revision were identified. Recommendations about informant choice by diagnosis are offered.

Conclusions

The strategy used in this study was useful for assessing the DISC'S sensitivity for these disorders. Additional work examining specificity of the DISC remains to be done. The DISC should prove a useful adjunct in clinical settings given the ease and relatively low cost of administration. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 1993, 32, 3:666–673.

References (30)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (1987)
  • J.C. Anthony et al.

    Comparison of the lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis-experience in eastern Baltimore

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1985)
  • W.J. Chambers et al.

    The assessment of affective disorders in children and adolescents by semi-structured interview: test-retest reliability of the K-SADS-P

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1985)
  • A.J. Costello et al.

    Development and Testing of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children in a Clinical Population: Final Report

    (1984)
  • E.J. Costello et al.

    Validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children: a comparison between psychiatric and pediatric referrals

    J. Abnorm. Child Psychol.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (233)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Prepared with the support of Grants MH-16434 , MH-36971 , MHCRC-30906 , and MHCRC-43878 ; and Contract 278–89-0002. We acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals: H. Bird, M.D., K. Bourdon, M.A., J. Busner, Ph.D., M. Campbell, M.D., G. Canino, Ph.D., J. Cioffi, L. Cohen, M.D., S. Dashielle, R.N., M. Davies, M.P.H., M. DeGroot, M. Dulcan, M.D., M. Ernst, M.D., K. Halmi, M.D., M. Hardin, R.N., R. Hicks, B. Lahey, Ph.D., M. Lenane, M.S.W., P. Leaf, Ph.D., M. Liebowitz, M.D., B. Locke, M.S.P.H., A. Morishima, M.S., M. Parides, M.S., J. Puig-Antich, M.D., J. Rapoport, M.D., D. Rettew, M. Riddle, M.D., Mary Rojas, Ph.D., N. Ryan, M.D., A. Schumann, S. Swedo, M.D., J. Wicks, A. Whitaker, M.D., and M. Woodbury, M.D.

    View full text