Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Case StudyThe Child Behavior Checklist Nonclinical Standardization Samples: Should They Be Utilized as Norms?
References (12)
- et al.
Epidemiological comparisons of American and Dutch children: I. Behavioral/emotional problems and competencies reported by parents for ages 4 to 16
J. Am. Acad. Child. Adolesc Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
Epidemiology of behavioral and emotional problems among Thai and American children: parent reports for ages 6 to 11
J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four to sixteen
Monogr. Soc. Res. Child. Dev., 46
(1981) - et al.
Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile
(1983) - et al.
Bibliography of Published studies using the Child Behavior Checklist and Related Materials, Version 1.0
(1988) - et al.
Estimates of the prevalence of childhood maladjustment in a community survey in Puerto Rico
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(1988)
Cited by (74)
Early developmental, behavioral, and quality of life outcomes following abusive head trauma in infants
2020, Child Abuse and NeglectCitation Excerpt :Behavioral problems were also found to be greater in patients who were male, black race, or had public insurance. These gender and racial differences have been identified within the general population (Liu, Cheng, & Leung, 2011; Sandberg, Meyer-Bahlburg, & Yager, 1991). Among children with abusive head trauma, Nuño et al. (2018) found those covered by Medicaid insurance to be at an increased risk of behavioral disorders by age 5 than those covered by private insurance.
How are the kids holding up? A systematic review and meta-analysis on the psychosocial impact of maternal breast cancer on children
2016, Cancer Treatment ReviewsCitation Excerpt :We also found that studies using control groups reported higher internalizing problems for CWBC whereas studies using normative data reported fewer externalizing and total problems. Indeed, some researchers question the common practice of using the CBCL norms as a yardstick for child functioning because the norms may be outdated [37,38,69]. For example, Sandberg et al. [38] compared the CBCL nonclinical sample with a community sample and found that the total problem scores in the community sample were much higher than the CBCL norms.
Longitudinal experiences of children remaining at home after a first-time investigation for suspected maltreatment
2012, Journal of PediatricsCitation Excerpt :These measures are described in Table I. Where possible, we identified prevalence estimates for these same risks in the general US population for comparison.22,24-28 To describe CPS involvement with these households, we identified the primary type of maltreatment (physical or sexual abuse, neglect, or other) and the outcome of CPS investigation (substantiated or not).
The Picture Anxiety Test (PAT): A new pictorial assessment of anxiety symptoms in young children
2009, Journal of Anxiety DisordersCitation Excerpt :Parents are asked to indicate whether each behavior is not true for their child (0), somewhat or sometimes true (1), or very true or often true (2) now or during the past six months. Several studies have supported the instrument's psychometric properties, showing good reliability and validity of both the English version (Achenbach, 1991; Cohen, Gotlieb, Kershner, & Wehrspann, 1985; Sandberg, Meyer-Bahlburg, & Yager, 1991) and the German version (Reinhard & Remschmidt, 1999; Schmeck et al., 2001). The internal consistencies in the current sample were α = .88 (mothers) and α = .84 (fathers) for the internalizing problems scale and α = .93 (mothers) and α = .91 (fathers) for the externalizing problems scale.
Cognition, health-related quality of life, and psychosocial functioning after GH/GnRHA treatment in young adults born SGA
2018, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
The authors thank the school administrators, staff, and parents of the participating school district. Thanks also to the following research assistants: Lauren Baas, Evan Elkin, Ingrid Galed, Jennifer Hay, Marie Jean, Eden Kainer, Baan Kassir, Bonna Kennedy, Odine Kleiner, Debbie Kornfeld, Erika Milvy, Jamie Phillips, Lesley Pratt, Allysa Rieder, Joan Romo, Joseph Skoler, Jennifer Sloan, Elizabeth Trainor, Bayla Travis, and Margarita Viera. The authors also acknowledge the secretarial assistance of Pat Connolly ad Dorothy Lewis.
Dr. David Sandberg was supported by National Research Service Award HD06726 from the NICHD. This work was supported in part by a Small Grant from the Spencer Foundation, Grant 87-0982-84 from the William T. Grant Foundation, NIMH Research Grant RO3 MH-40914, and NIMH Clinical Research Center Grant MH-30906.