Special Section
Utility of the Beck Depression Inventory with Clinic-Referred Adolescents

https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199003000-00018Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

This study reports on the utilization of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA) in a sample of 100 clinic referred adolescents. Results indicate that the BDI efficiently identified and differentiated depressed from nondepressed adolescents. In addition, greater levels of depressive symptomatology and depressive disorder were found in girls. Reasons for these general sex differences are discussed, and it is concluded that a psychological explanation appears more promising than existing biological explanations.

REFERENCES (29)

  • E.J. Costello et al.

    Scales to assess child and adolescent depression: Checklists, screens, and nets

    J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • A.E. Kazdin

    Assessment techniques for childhood depression

    J. Amer. Acad. Child Psychiatry

    (1981)
  • L.Y. Abramson et al.

    Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation

    J. Abnorm. Psychol.

    (1978)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • A.T. Beck

    Measuring depression: The depression inventory

  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Assessment of depression: The depression inventory

  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Cognitive Theory of Depression.

    (1979)
  • W. Dorus et al.

    Depression, demographic dimensions, and drug abuse

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1980)
  • C.S. Dweck et al.

    Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children

    J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.

    (1973)
  • C.S. Dweck et al.

    Sex differences in learned helplessness: I. Differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators

    Developmental Psychology

    (1976)
  • C.S. Dweck et al.

    Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and III. An experimental analysis

    Developmental Psychology

    (1978)
  • J. Endicott et al.

    A diagnostic interview: The schedule for affective disorder and schizophrenia

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1978)
  • M.E. Faulstich et al.

    Assessment of depression in childhood and adolescence: An evaluation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (1986)
  • B. Herjanic et al.

    Are children reliable reporters?

    J. Abnorm. Child Psychol.

    (1975)
  • Cited by (55)

    • Concurrent Treatment of Depression in Parents and Adolescents: A Case Example

      2017, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Severity of each item is rated on a scale ranging from 0 to 3. Several studies have demonstrated the applicability of the BDI with adolescents (Kashani, Sherman, Parker, & Reid, 1990; Steer, Clark, Beck, & Ranieri, 1995; Strober, Green, & Carlson, 1981) as well as adults. This scale was administered to both parents and adolescents.

    • Symptom screening scales for detecting major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic utility

      2015, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Five studies examined the NPV of the BDI, with values of 0.80 (Bennett et al., 1997), 0.95 (Dolle et al., 2012), 0.97 (Russell et al., 2012), 0.98 (Adewuya et al., 2007) 0.99 (Canals et al., 2001) and 0.99 (Roberts et al., 1991) (Fig. 3). Six studies (7 data points) used AUC analyses to examine the diagnostic accuracy of the BDI (Adewuya et al., 2007; Blom et al., 2010; Dolle et al., 2012; Kashani et al., 1990; Roberts et al., 1991; Russell et al., 2012), and overall accuracy was classified as ‘high’ (7 data points, n=3249, pooled estimate: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81–1.00). Metaregression showed that the sample type (clinical vs. nonclinical; t(1, 6)=0.39, p=0.71, R2<0), sample age (child vs. adolescent; t(1, 6)=0.09, p=0.93, R2<0), cutpoint used (t(1, 6)=0.17, p=0.87, R2<0) and risk of bias quality score (t(1, 6)=1.44, p=0.19, R2=14.16%) did not significantly affect AUC values on the BDI.

    • Crocin, the main active saffron constituent, as an adjunctive treatment in major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot clinical trial

      2014, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      BDI is the most widely used self-rating scale and previous studies indicated its reliability and validity in patients with depression (Jolly et al., 1993). It is appropriate to all social levels and is neither age nor culture based (Kashani et al., 1990). It consists of 21 items of emotional, behavioral, and somatic symptoms.

    • Factors associated with substance use in adolescents with eating disorders

      2014, Journal of Adolescent Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Scores over 18 indicate moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms. It has been used in several adolescent ED populations, has good psychometric properties, and strongly correlates with clinical depression [24–26]. The Cronbach's alpha in this sample was .92.

    • Driven exercise among treatment-seeking youth with eating disorders

      2011, Eating Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Scores over 18 indicate moderate to severe depressive symptoms. The BDI has good psychometric properties (Barrera & Garrison-Jones, 1988) and shows strong associations with clinical depression (Kashani, Sherman, Parker, & Reid, 1990). The BDI has also been utilized in multiple studies with pediatric eating disorder samples (Lock et al., 2010; Zaitsoff, Celio Doyle, Rienecke Hoste, & Le Grange, 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text