Original Manuscripts
Methods for Screening for Hearing Loss in Older Adults

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-199401000-00007Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Two common screening tools for detecting hearing loss, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening Version (HHIE-S) and Audioscope, are compared. One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients over age 60 at a primary care clinic received both screening tests followed by pure tone audiometry. Three criteria for hearing loss were considered: Speech Frequency Pure Tone Average  25 dB; High Frequency Pure Tone Average ≥ 25 dB; and Ventry and Weinstein’s criteria of a 40 dB loss at 1.0 or 2.0 kHz. Ranges of respective operating characteristics for the Audioscope versus the HHIE-S were: sensitivities 0.64 to 0.96 versus 0.29 to 0.63; specificities 0.80 to 0.91 versus 0.75 to 0.93; and positive likelihood ratios 4.86 to 7.52 versus 2.42 to 4.27. Most patients preferred screening with the Audioscope (60%) over the HHIE-S (13%). The Audioscope is preferred by patients, and outperforms the HHIE-S using a variety of reference standard definitions.

References (17)

  • P.W. Ries
  • J.M. Singer et al.

    Assessment of hearing health knowledge

    Gerontologist

    (1982)
  • N.S. Rees

    Hearing health system criticized by Nader retired professional action group

    ASHA

    (1973)
  • M.C. Leske

    Prevalence estimates of communicative disorders in the U.S. Language, hearing and vestibular disorders

    ASHA

    (1981)
  • A.J. Moss et al.
  • Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1979)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Supported in part by an American College of Physicians’ Teaching and Research Scholarship.

View full text