Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proper functioning of the male reproductive axis depends on complex feedback systems between several hormones. In this study, the genetic contribution of various endocrine components of the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis is evaluated and previously observed differences in FSH and inhibin B levels between mono- (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins are re-investigated.

METHODS

Inhibin B, FSH, LH, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and testosterone levels were assayed in 128 adult males (20 MZ twin pairs, 7 single MZ twins, 10 DZ twin pairs, 27 single DZ twins and 34 siblings of twins, constituting 10 sibling pairs), aged 15.6–68.7 years. Hormone levels were compared across zygosity groups and heritability estimates were obtained using maximum likelihood variance component analysis.

RESULTS

Heritability estimates ranged from 56% (testosterone) to 81% (inhibin B and SHBG). For LH and FSH, the heritability was estimated at 68% and 80% respectively. No mean differences in hormone levels were observed across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All measured hormones are highly heritable. A difference in the FSH-inhibin B feedback system between DZ twin males and MZ twin males could not be confirmed.

Introduction

The testis is the target organ of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis. GnRH secreted by the hypothalamic pulse generator is released in a pulsatile fashion into the portal vascular system, through which the hypothalamus communicates with the pituitary. This pulsatile secretion is essential for the release of FSH and LH by the anterior pituitary (Veldhuis et al., 1983). The main functions of the human testis are the production of hormones and the regulation of spermatogenesis. Pituitary-released FSH stimulates testicular Sertoli cells to produce inhibin B, which in adult males has been shown to be a serum marker of Sertoli cell function c.q. spermatogenesis (Jensen et al., 1997; Pierik et al., 1998; Andersson and Skakkebaek, 2001; Andersson et al., 2003). FSH release and synthesis consist of both a GnRH dependent and an autonomous component which is inhibited by inhibin B (Jenner et al., 1985; Moore et al., 1994; Andersson and Skakkebaek, 2001). Recently, Sutcliffe et al. (2006) compared reproductive hormones in monozygotic (MZ) versus dizygotic (DZ) male twins and reported elevated inhibin B levels in DZ twins. No such difference for FSH was found. This led to the suggestion that the FSH-inhibin B endocrine feedback axis is functioning differently in male DZ twins. However, as regular siblings were not included in these analyses it is as yet unclear whether DZ twins have significantly higher inhibin B levels than usual or whether MZ twins have significantly lower inhibin B levels.

LH interacts with the testicular Leydig cells to enhance the conversion of cholesterol to testosterone. Both dihydrotestosterone, a testosterone metabolite, and estradiol play a role in the feedback system regulating LH secretion (Santen, 1975; Hayes et al., 2001). Testosterone inhibits LH release directly (Sheckter et al., 1989) by altering the pulse amplitude and frequency (Valk et al., 1980; Shupnik, 1996) of the hypothalamic-stimulated release of LH from the pituitary (Santen, 1975; Matsumoto and Bremner, 1984).

In 1996, Harris et al. first stated that testosterone level are highly heritable especially in young adult males, with an estimated 66% of the variance due to genetic components (Harris et al., 1998; Hoekstra et al., 2006). Plasma hormone levels reflect the quantity of hormone available for binding to their target tissues. Biological activity is determined by several factors, e.g. sensitivity of the target tissue defined by hormone-receptor interaction (Wilson et al., 1981; Meikle et al., 1986). Serum hormone concentrations are subject to regulation at the genetic level as well as having environmental influences. Genetic effects might occur somewhere along the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis, i.e. the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator, the anterior pituitary, the gonadal receptor or the hormonal feedback system.

The aim of this current study was to evaluate the genetic contribution of the various endocrine components of the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis. Therefore, a sample of adult male twins and their siblings was assayed for plasma hormones including inhibin B, LH, FSH, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and testosterone. Males are chosen as study subjects because they provide a relatively stable endocrine environment compared to females, due to the absence of a monthly cycle.

Furthermore, we aimed to verify the earlier reported difference between MZ and DZ twins with regard to inhibin B secretion. To test for the possibility that twins differ from singleton offspring, siblings of the MZ and DZ twins were included in the analyses as well.

Subjects and Methods

This study is part of a larger study on the genetics of adult brain function (Posthuma et al., 2005). Forty-seven MZ males (20 complete pairs and 7 single MZ twin males), 47 male DZ twins (10 complete pairs and 27 single DZ males) and 34 brothers of these twins (17 brothers of a MZ and 17 brothers of a DZ twin, making up 10 complete sibling pairs) were included in the study. Twins and their siblings were invited to the lab where fasting blood samples were taken before 11:00 am to determine inhibin B, FSH, LH, SHBG and testosterone levels. The participants age ranged 15.6–68.7 years (mean ± SD: 38.1 ± 12.7) and had no apparent endocrine disease. Zygosity was determined by typing a series of DNA polymorphisms. The study was approved by the Medical Ethical committee of the VU medical center and all participants signed an informed consent.

Assays

All hormone measurements were done in duplicate and within the same series. Family members were randomly distributed within the different batches.

Inhibin B

An immunometric assay (Serotec Limited, Oxford, UK) was used to measure inhibin B in serum. According to the manufacturer the lower detection level for inhibin is 15 IU/L. The inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were <16% and the intra-assay CVs were <11%.

Testosterone

The plasma concentrations of testosterone were measured using a radioimmunoassay (Coat-a-count, DPC, Los Angeles, USA). The inter-assay CVs were all 20% or less and the intra-assay CVs were <9%.

Follicle stimulating hormone

FSH was measured using an AxSYM random access immunoassay analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) with a microparticle enzyme immunoassay reagent kit. According to the manufacturer, the lower detection limit for FSH is 0.09 IU/l. The inter-assay CVs and intra-assay CVs were both <6%.

Luteinizing hormone

An immunometric assay (Delfia, Wallac Turku Finland) was used to measure LH in serum. According to the manufacturer the lower detection level for LH was 0.3 IU/l. The inter-assay CVs were <9% and the intra-assay CVs were <5%.

Sex hormone-binding protein

An immunoradiometric assay (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland) was used for the determination of SHBG levels in plasma. The inter-assay CVs were 8% or less and the intra-assay CVs were all 4%.

Statistical analysis

For FSH, LH and SHBG the data were positively skewed and were logarithmically transformed to normalize the distributions. The Mx package (Neale, 2003) was used to conduct the genetic analyses and to test whether the hormonal levels of the MZ twins, DZ twins and siblings differed significantly from each other. The fact that the participants can not be regarded as independent observations (i.e. are related) is accounted for in all these analyses. The data were first summarized into correlations for MZ and DZ twins and sibling pairs. These correlations between MZ twins and DZ twin sibling pairs can be used to obtain rough estimates of the proportional contribution of additive genetic influences and dominant genetic influences to the variation in the levels of the hormones under study, i.e. the so called Falconer heritability estimates.

Next, the variation in hormone levels was decomposed into additive genetic variation (A),variation due to genetic dominance (D), shared environmental variation (C) or non-shared environmental variation (E) (Boomsma et al., 2002; Posthuma et al., 2003). Shared environmental variation, by definition, includes all environmental sources of variation that twins and siblings from the same family share, while non-shared environmental variation refers to the environmental variation, i.e. unique to an individual and, i.e. typically not shared with other family members. In DZ twins and sibpairs, similarity in shared environmental influences is 100%, while similarity in additive genetic influences is 50% and similarity in genetic dominance effects is 25%. In MZ twin pairs, similarities of additive genetic effects, genetic dominance effects and shared environmental influences are 100% (Neale and Cardon, 1992; Posthuma et al., 2003).

There is, by definition, no similarity in non-shared environmental influences between family members irrespective of their precise relationship. Effects for genetic dominance and shared environment are confounded in the classical twin model and cannot be modelled simultaneously. Disentangling the contributions of dominance and shared environment requires additional data from, e.g. twins reared apart, half-sibs, or non-biological relatives reared together (Posthuma et al., 2003). As such additional data were not available in the present study, the analyses were confined to ACE- or ADE models, respectively. When the observed correlation between DZ twins is about half the size of those observed in MZ twins, dominance effects are assumed absent and an ACE model is deemed most suitable. However, when the observed correlation between DZ twins is substantially smaller than half the correlation observed between MZ twins, dominance effects are likely to be present and an ADE model is deemed most suitable. The expectation for the total variance given an ACE model is A + C + E, while the expectation for the covariance between MZ twins is A + C, and the expectation for DZ twins/sibpairs is half A + C. The expectation for the total variance given an ADE model is A + D + E, while the expectation for the covariance between MZ twins is A + D and the expectation for DZ twins/sibpairs half A+ one fourth D. Heritability is calculated as the proportional contribution of genetic variation to the total, observed variation (i.e. A in the ACE model and A + D in the ADE model). Estimates of parameters were obtained in the Mx package by normal theory maximum likelihood. Whether additive genetic (A), dominance effects (D) and shared environmental (C) influences contribute significantly to the total variance, was tested by constraining these parameters at zero and comparing the fit of the resulting model to the fit of the model without these constraints using likelihood ratio tests (Posthuma et al., 2003). In addition, Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was used to differentiate between alternative models. The model with the smallest AIC is regarded as the best fitting model (Schermelleh-Engel et al., 2006). As hormone levels (especially FSH) might be influenced by age of the participant or age of the participant's mother at time of birth, both age measures were regressed out in all analyses.

Results

Group characteristics are summarized as the mean (±SD) of age, inhibin B, testosterone, FSH, LH and SHBG levels for MZ twins, DZ twins and singleton brothers (Table 1).

Table 1:

The mean (±SD) of age and reproductive hormone levels for MZ and DZ twins and their siblings

CharacteristicsMZ (n = 47)DZ (n = 47)MZ sibs (n = 17)DZ sibs (n = 17)
Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)
Age (years)37.7 (11.3)37.5 (12.8)42.3 (15.9)36.6 (12.8)
Inhibin B (ng/l)201.8 (58.5)208.9 (70.9)207.2 (83.8)194.1 (42.9)
Testosterone (nmol/L)18.5 (5.1)18.9 (4.1)18.5 (5.3)17.5 (4.9)
FSH (IU/l)4.3 (2)4.1 (2.3)4.3 (1.4)2.9 (1.6)
LH (IU/l)4.1 (1.5)4.1 (1.7)4.5 (1.4)3.3 (1.4)
SHBG (nmol/l)36.4 (15.1)34.7 (14.8)33.6 (1.3)31.1 (1.6)
CharacteristicsMZ (n = 47)DZ (n = 47)MZ sibs (n = 17)DZ sibs (n = 17)
Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)
Age (years)37.7 (11.3)37.5 (12.8)42.3 (15.9)36.6 (12.8)
Inhibin B (ng/l)201.8 (58.5)208.9 (70.9)207.2 (83.8)194.1 (42.9)
Testosterone (nmol/L)18.5 (5.1)18.9 (4.1)18.5 (5.3)17.5 (4.9)
FSH (IU/l)4.3 (2)4.1 (2.3)4.3 (1.4)2.9 (1.6)
LH (IU/l)4.1 (1.5)4.1 (1.7)4.5 (1.4)3.3 (1.4)
SHBG (nmol/l)36.4 (15.1)34.7 (14.8)33.6 (1.3)31.1 (1.6)

n, number of individuals. MZ twins (20 complete pairs and 7 single twins), DZ twins (10 complete pairs and 27 single twins).

Table 1:

The mean (±SD) of age and reproductive hormone levels for MZ and DZ twins and their siblings

CharacteristicsMZ (n = 47)DZ (n = 47)MZ sibs (n = 17)DZ sibs (n = 17)
Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)
Age (years)37.7 (11.3)37.5 (12.8)42.3 (15.9)36.6 (12.8)
Inhibin B (ng/l)201.8 (58.5)208.9 (70.9)207.2 (83.8)194.1 (42.9)
Testosterone (nmol/L)18.5 (5.1)18.9 (4.1)18.5 (5.3)17.5 (4.9)
FSH (IU/l)4.3 (2)4.1 (2.3)4.3 (1.4)2.9 (1.6)
LH (IU/l)4.1 (1.5)4.1 (1.7)4.5 (1.4)3.3 (1.4)
SHBG (nmol/l)36.4 (15.1)34.7 (14.8)33.6 (1.3)31.1 (1.6)
CharacteristicsMZ (n = 47)DZ (n = 47)MZ sibs (n = 17)DZ sibs (n = 17)
Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)
Age (years)37.7 (11.3)37.5 (12.8)42.3 (15.9)36.6 (12.8)
Inhibin B (ng/l)201.8 (58.5)208.9 (70.9)207.2 (83.8)194.1 (42.9)
Testosterone (nmol/L)18.5 (5.1)18.9 (4.1)18.5 (5.3)17.5 (4.9)
FSH (IU/l)4.3 (2)4.1 (2.3)4.3 (1.4)2.9 (1.6)
LH (IU/l)4.1 (1.5)4.1 (1.7)4.5 (1.4)3.3 (1.4)
SHBG (nmol/l)36.4 (15.1)34.7 (14.8)33.6 (1.3)31.1 (1.6)

n, number of individuals. MZ twins (20 complete pairs and 7 single twins), DZ twins (10 complete pairs and 27 single twins).

Hormone comparison

The mean age between the groups did not differ significantly [χ2 (3) < 1, ns]. Comparison of serum inhibin B levels revealed no significant differences between DZ twins and their siblings, MZ twins and their siblings or between MZ and DZ families [for all tests χ2 (1) < 1, ns]. Correction for age of the participants and maternal age at time of birth of the twin did not alter these outcomes [for all tests χ2 (2) < 1, ns]. Correction of inhibin B levels for LH, SHBG and testosterone did not change the results either [DZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) = 1.72 (ns); MZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) < 1 (ns) and offspring DZ families versus offspring MZ families: χ2 (1) < 1 (ns)]. Likewise, the FSH levels of DZ twins did not differ from that of their siblings [χ2 (1) = 1.77, ns], nor did the FSH levels of MZ twins differ from their siblings [χ2 (1) < 1, ns]. FSH levels between offspring from DZ and MZ families were comparable [χ2 (1) = 3.37, ns]. Again, correction for age of the participants and maternal age at time of birth of the twin and correction for levels of LH, SHBG and testosterone did not change these results [DZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) = 1.07 (ns); MZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) < 1 (ns) and offspring DZ families versus offspring MZ families: χ2 (1) = 1.07 (ns)].

As expected, no mean differences between MZ and DZ twins and their siblings were found for testosterone levels [DZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) = 1.38 (ns); MZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) < 1 (ns) and offspring DZ families versus offspring MZ families: χ2 (1) = 1.45 (ns)], for LH levels [DZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) = 1.65 (ns); MZ twins versus their siblings: χ2 (1) = 2.20 (ns) and offspring DZ families versus offspring MZ families: χ2 (1) = 1.75 (ns)] and for SHBG levels [for all tests: χ2 (1) < 1 (ns)] before and after correction for age of the participants and maternal age at time of birth of the twin.

Genetic analysis

The DZ twin correlations did not differ significantly from twin-sib or sib-sib correlations and these correlations were constrained to be equal in all further analyses. The twin correlations and the Falconer heritability estimate for LH, FSH, inhibin B, testosterone and SHBG are listed in Table 2.

Table 2:

MZ and the DZ+sibs twin correlations [95% confidence interval (CI)] for all reproductive hormones

rMZ (95% CI)rDZ+sibs (95% CI)Broad sense heritability
Inhibin B0.82 (0.62–0.90)0.15 (−0.11–0.42)0.82
Testosterone0.58 (0.27–0.76)0.20 (−0.11–0.48)0.58
FSH0.79 (0.56–0.89)0.48 (0.12–0.70)0.62
LH0.68 (0.36–0.83)0.36 (−0.01–0.62)0.64
SHBG0.81 (0.63–0.90)0.41 (0.12–0.63)0.80
rMZ (95% CI)rDZ+sibs (95% CI)Broad sense heritability
Inhibin B0.82 (0.62–0.90)0.15 (−0.11–0.42)0.82
Testosterone0.58 (0.27–0.76)0.20 (−0.11–0.48)0.58
FSH0.79 (0.56–0.89)0.48 (0.12–0.70)0.62
LH0.68 (0.36–0.83)0.36 (−0.01–0.62)0.64
SHBG0.81 (0.63–0.90)0.41 (0.12–0.63)0.80

rMZ = correlation between MZ twins (based on 20 complete pairs); rDZ+sib = correlation between DZ twins and regular siblings (based on 10 complete DZ pairs and 10 complete sib-pairs). Broad sense heritability is calculated using the formula: 2(rMZrDZ+sib). If the rMZ is more than twice the rDZ+sib dominance is likely to be present and the broad sense heritability is calculated using the formula: (4rDZ+sibrMZ) + 2(rMZ−2 rDZ+sib).

Table 2:

MZ and the DZ+sibs twin correlations [95% confidence interval (CI)] for all reproductive hormones

rMZ (95% CI)rDZ+sibs (95% CI)Broad sense heritability
Inhibin B0.82 (0.62–0.90)0.15 (−0.11–0.42)0.82
Testosterone0.58 (0.27–0.76)0.20 (−0.11–0.48)0.58
FSH0.79 (0.56–0.89)0.48 (0.12–0.70)0.62
LH0.68 (0.36–0.83)0.36 (−0.01–0.62)0.64
SHBG0.81 (0.63–0.90)0.41 (0.12–0.63)0.80
rMZ (95% CI)rDZ+sibs (95% CI)Broad sense heritability
Inhibin B0.82 (0.62–0.90)0.15 (−0.11–0.42)0.82
Testosterone0.58 (0.27–0.76)0.20 (−0.11–0.48)0.58
FSH0.79 (0.56–0.89)0.48 (0.12–0.70)0.62
LH0.68 (0.36–0.83)0.36 (−0.01–0.62)0.64
SHBG0.81 (0.63–0.90)0.41 (0.12–0.63)0.80

rMZ = correlation between MZ twins (based on 20 complete pairs); rDZ+sib = correlation between DZ twins and regular siblings (based on 10 complete DZ pairs and 10 complete sib-pairs). Broad sense heritability is calculated using the formula: 2(rMZrDZ+sib). If the rMZ is more than twice the rDZ+sib dominance is likely to be present and the broad sense heritability is calculated using the formula: (4rDZ+sibrMZ) + 2(rMZ−2 rDZ+sib).

For all reproductive hormone measurements, the MZ correlation exceeded the DZ twin correlation, suggesting genetic influences on hormonal levels. As the DZ correlations for inhibin B and testosterone were considerably smaller than half the MZ correlations, ADE models were deemed suitable for these hormones. For the other hormones ACE models were fitted. In all following analyses, age of the participant and age of the mother at time of birth of the participants is regressed out. Table 3 shows the results of variance component modelling for all reproductive hormones. For FSH and SHBG, shared environmental influences were not important, i.e. the parameters representing the shared environmental influences were not significantly different from zero. Constraining the additive genetic effects to zero did however result in significant deterioration of the model fit. For LH, both the AE model (shared environmental effects fixed to zero, p = 0.933) and the CE model (additive genetic effects fixed to zero, p = 0.091) were statistically acceptable. The AE model, however, is the preferred model as it fits the data better (largest P-value and lowest AIC). For FSH, LH and SHBG variation in hormonal levels could thus be attributed to additive genetic influences (A) and unique environmental influences (E). Heritability estimates for LH, FSH and SHBG were 68, 80 and 81%, respectively. For both inhibin B and testosterone, the AE model (genetic dominance effects constrained to zero) was tenable, i.e. the fit was not statistically worse than the ADE model. Note that the DE models are not tested as such models are biologically implausible. Heritably estimates for inhibin B and testosterone were 81 and 56%, respectively.

Table 3:

Fit results from models where the variance of hormonal levels is decomposed into additive genetic variance (A), shared environmental variance (C) or genetic dominance variance (D) and non-shared environmental variance (E)

Tested modelSaturated modelP-valueAICACDE
Inhibin BADESAT0.874−8.1870.000.820.18
AEADE0.061.4480.810.19
EADE<0.00115.3201
TestosteroneADESAT0.287−3.7970.220.350.42
AEADE0.574−1.6840.560.44
EADE0.0037.7631
FSHACESAT0.958−8.9430.630.160.21
AEACE0.602−1.7280.800.20
CEACE0.0272.8940.590.41
EACE<<0.00117.973
LHACESAT0.688−6.9250.660.030.32
AEACE0.933−1.9930.680.32
CEACE0.0910.8620.480.52
EACE<0.00110.5081
SHBGACESAT0.951−8.8630.800.010.19
AEACE0.964−1.9980.810.19
CEACE0.0027.6440.530.47
EACE<<0.00125.7451
Tested modelSaturated modelP-valueAICACDE
Inhibin BADESAT0.874−8.1870.000.820.18
AEADE0.061.4480.810.19
EADE<0.00115.3201
TestosteroneADESAT0.287−3.7970.220.350.42
AEADE0.574−1.6840.560.44
EADE0.0037.7631
FSHACESAT0.958−8.9430.630.160.21
AEACE0.602−1.7280.800.20
CEACE0.0272.8940.590.41
EACE<<0.00117.973
LHACESAT0.688−6.9250.660.030.32
AEACE0.933−1.9930.680.32
CEACE0.0910.8620.480.52
EACE<0.00110.5081
SHBGACESAT0.951−8.8630.800.010.19
AEACE0.964−1.9980.810.19
CEACE0.0027.6440.530.47
EACE<<0.00125.7451

The ACE models were all tested against a saturated model in which the variance was not decomposed into A, C and E (i.e. the null model). In the AE model, the shared environmental effect (C) is fixed to zero. In the CE model, the additive genetic effect (A) is fixed to zero. In the E model, both A and C are fixed to zero. The fit of the AE model, the CE model and the E model were compared to the fit of the ACE model. The ADE models were all tested against a saturated model in which the variance was not decomposed into A, D and E (i.e. the ‘null model’). In the AE model, the genetic dominance effect (D) is fixed to zero. In the E model, both A and D are fixed to zero. The fit of the AE model and the E model were compared to the fit of the ADE model. A significant P-value (P < 0.05) denotes a significant deterioration of the fit. Best fit models are in bold. AIC with lower values indicating better fit. These analyses are based on 20 complete MZ twin pairs, 10 complete DZ twin pairs, 10 complete sibling pairs and 48 single subjects.

Table 3:

Fit results from models where the variance of hormonal levels is decomposed into additive genetic variance (A), shared environmental variance (C) or genetic dominance variance (D) and non-shared environmental variance (E)

Tested modelSaturated modelP-valueAICACDE
Inhibin BADESAT0.874−8.1870.000.820.18
AEADE0.061.4480.810.19
EADE<0.00115.3201
TestosteroneADESAT0.287−3.7970.220.350.42
AEADE0.574−1.6840.560.44
EADE0.0037.7631
FSHACESAT0.958−8.9430.630.160.21
AEACE0.602−1.7280.800.20
CEACE0.0272.8940.590.41
EACE<<0.00117.973
LHACESAT0.688−6.9250.660.030.32
AEACE0.933−1.9930.680.32
CEACE0.0910.8620.480.52
EACE<0.00110.5081
SHBGACESAT0.951−8.8630.800.010.19
AEACE0.964−1.9980.810.19
CEACE0.0027.6440.530.47
EACE<<0.00125.7451
Tested modelSaturated modelP-valueAICACDE
Inhibin BADESAT0.874−8.1870.000.820.18
AEADE0.061.4480.810.19
EADE<0.00115.3201
TestosteroneADESAT0.287−3.7970.220.350.42
AEADE0.574−1.6840.560.44
EADE0.0037.7631
FSHACESAT0.958−8.9430.630.160.21
AEACE0.602−1.7280.800.20
CEACE0.0272.8940.590.41
EACE<<0.00117.973
LHACESAT0.688−6.9250.660.030.32
AEACE0.933−1.9930.680.32
CEACE0.0910.8620.480.52
EACE<0.00110.5081
SHBGACESAT0.951−8.8630.800.010.19
AEACE0.964−1.9980.810.19
CEACE0.0027.6440.530.47
EACE<<0.00125.7451

The ACE models were all tested against a saturated model in which the variance was not decomposed into A, C and E (i.e. the null model). In the AE model, the shared environmental effect (C) is fixed to zero. In the CE model, the additive genetic effect (A) is fixed to zero. In the E model, both A and C are fixed to zero. The fit of the AE model, the CE model and the E model were compared to the fit of the ACE model. The ADE models were all tested against a saturated model in which the variance was not decomposed into A, D and E (i.e. the ‘null model’). In the AE model, the genetic dominance effect (D) is fixed to zero. In the E model, both A and D are fixed to zero. The fit of the AE model and the E model were compared to the fit of the ADE model. A significant P-value (P < 0.05) denotes a significant deterioration of the fit. Best fit models are in bold. AIC with lower values indicating better fit. These analyses are based on 20 complete MZ twin pairs, 10 complete DZ twin pairs, 10 complete sibling pairs and 48 single subjects.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that all measured reproductive hormones are highly heritable, with heritability estimates ranging from 56% (testosterone) to 81% (inhibin B and SHBG). This high heritability does not imply that environmental factors are unimportant but it indicates that within the population, genetic factors are responsible for the majority of the variation. For testosterone, but especially inhibin B, the broad-sense heritability seems driven for a large part by non-additive genetic or dominance influences. However, our sample is relatively small and larger samples are needed to allow a more accurate estimate of these influences and for sufficient power to discriminate between additive and non-additive genetic influences. Our data confirm and extend the findings by Storgaard et al. (2006) who recently published a heritability estimate for inhibin B of 79%. In 1997, Meikle et al. (1997) reported a 74% heritability for testicular volumes of male twins between 25 and 75 years old. Most of the testicular volume in adult males is determined by Sertoli cell mass, and inhibin B is known to be a serum marker for the competence of Sertoli cells cq. spermatogenesis (Pierik et al., 1998). With regard to plain comparison of hormone levels between twins, Sutcliffe et al. (2006) reported elevated inhibin B levels in DZ adult male twins when compared with MZ twins across an age range of 20–68 years old. In our data, we found no significant difference in inhibin B or FSH levels between MZ and DZ twins and their siblings (age range 15–69 years old), or for any of the other hormones under study. Correction for possible confounding effects of age of the participants and maternal age at time of birth of her twin did not alter these findings; neither did correction of inhibin B and FSH levels for LH, SHBG and testosterone. Close inspection of the means of inhibin B in Table 1 shows that the lowest inhibin B levels are observed for the youngest group (siblings of DZ twins). Yet, inhibin B levels did not differ significantly between any of the groups as the variation within groups was rather large and analyses with age as a (linearly related) covariate did not alter these results. It is however possible that the relation between age and inhibin B is non-linear. We did not test for non-linear effects of age on hormone levels in the present study because of the small sample size, but the possibility merits further study.

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis used by Sutcliffe et al. (2006) to compare hormone levels between the twins does not account for the dependency of the observations. As twins and siblings are related (i.e. share genes and environment) they should not be analysed as independent samples (Rebollo et al., 2006). We therefore used the Mx package to analyse the twin hormone levels as this software package is designed to deal with family data. Nevertheless, when we analysed our data using the ANOVA that does not account for dependency of the data, we did not observe significant mean differences in inhibin B levels between MZ and DZ twins (data not shown). The difference between our results and the results presented by Sutcliffe et al. (2006) is therefore not due to the different statistical methods used. It is however possible that our study lacked the power to detect a mean difference in inhibin B as our sample was rather small. The power to detect substantial mean differences (e.g. mean difference of 0.5 or 1 SD, corresponding to Cohen's d effect size of 0.5 or 1, respectively, would have been mediocre to good (0.55–0.90) [Cohen's d is calculated as (M1−M2)/σpooled, where M1 is the mean of the first group, M2 is the mean of the second group and σpooled is the average of the SD in the first and the second group)]. However, the observed effect size in the present study was much smaller than that (0.11) and also much smaller than the that of Sutcliffe et al. (0.35). Furthermore, both Sutcliffe's and our study lack information on familial DZ twinning. Previous studies have shown that mothers of hereditary DZ twins (familial twinning) are known to have elevated follicular phase FSH levels resulting in multiple follicle growth and therefore an increased chance of having DZ twins (Martin et al., 1991; Lambalk et al., 1998a,b). As elevated follicular phase FSH levels are said to be inherited autosomally, increased FSH levels are expected in all offspring of these mothers. Differences in outcomes between our study and the one done by Sutcliffe et al (2006). may therefore be due to the ratio of hereditary DZ twins participating in the studies. Therefore, inclusion of information on familial twinning would be recommended for future studies on the heritability and mean levels of reproductive hormones.

In the late 1970s, Meikle et al. (1982) studied the contribution of genetic factors on the plasma levels of sex-steroids in siblings. They found less variation in testosterone within groups of brothers than among non-brothers. Within their twin studies (age 20–60 years), heritability estimates ranged from 34% for free (unbound) testosterone to 26% for plasma testosterone (Meikle et al., 1986). A high familial resemblance in testosterone levels of around 70% in both black and white adults (Hong et al., 2001) and 66% in adolescent male twins (age 14–21 years) was reported by Harris and colleagues (1998). Genetic variations accounted for 57% (maximum likelihood estimate) and 32% (Falconer heritability estimate) of the plasma testosterone concentrations reported in a twin study with a narrow age range of 59–70 years (Ring et al., 2005). In a recent twin study (age 20–45 years), a heritability of 46% was shown (Storgaard et al., 2006). Circulating in the blood, the sex steroids estradiol and testosterone are bound to the protein carrier SHBG. The heritability of SHBG measured in siblings ranged 31%–54% in blacks (Jaquish et al., 1997) and was estimated at 64% in whites (An et al., 2001). Meikle et al. (1997) reported a heritability estimate of 62% based on their twin studies (age 25–75 years), whereas estimates of 32% (by Falconer method) and 68% (based on maximum likelihood) were reported by Ring et al. (2005). Our results for testosterone are equal to those reported by Ring et al., while the heritability estimates for SHBG in the present study are much higher than those reported by others. These differences in heritability estimates could partially be explained by the different statistical methods used. In classical twin studies, the intraclass twin pair correlation was used to estimate the heritability (Falconer). In recent research, however, model fitting and comparison using the maximum likelihood is the preferred methodology. Another possible explanation for the variation in heritability estimates concerns the age range of the research samples. Although aging affects hormonal concentrations in men, there are no divergent effects on hormonal concentrations between MZ and DZ twins (Meikle et al., 1997). In the present study, the age range is indeed large but the mean age (±SD) showed no significant difference between the groups. Therefore, aging affects the data in a similar manner for MZ twins, DZ twins and their siblings. Furthermore, age of the participant and age of the mother at time of birth of the participant were regressed out in all genetic analyses.

For LH and FSH, a wide variety of heritability estimates is reported in 20–60-year old male twins, varying from 28% to almost 100% for FSH (Meikle et al., 1986, 1997; Wang et al., 2003; Storgaard et al., 2006) and from 50% to over 70% for LH (Meikle et al., 1986; 1997; Bishop et al., 1988; Wang et al., 2004; Storgaard et al., 2006). The serum LH and FSH concentrations display pulsatile and diurnal variation. These factors, together with the short serum half-life of the gonadotrophins, contribute to a substantial intra-individual variability. Despite this, the heritability estimates found in our study, 68% for LH and 80% for FSH, are high and well within the range estimated by others.

The objective of this study was to explore the genetic variation at the various levels in the regulation of gonadal function, i.e. the hypothalamic pulse generator, the anterior pituitary, the gonad and the feedback system. The hypothalamic pulse generator synchronizes the activity of groups of GnRH neurons to produce a meaningful secretory output. Recent in vitro animal studies indicate that GnRH cells contain ‘molecular clocks’, which may be coupled to the fundamental mechanism of pulsatile GnRH secretion. Disruption of the normal molecular clock gene expression leads to decreased pulse frequency and increased pulse amplitude (Balsalobre, 2002; Chappell et al., 2003). The variation in frequency and amplitude of the GnRH pulses in relation to the overall serum hormone levels has to be marginal considering the high heritability estimates found here, despite the large sampling time span. Earlier studies indicate that levels of various other hormones that are known to have a biorhythm, such as cortisol (Bartels et al., 2003a,b) and growth hormone (Mendlewicz et al., 1999), are also highly heritable. This led us to believe that the GnRH pulse patterns might be heritable. GnRH interacts with high-affinity receptors in cell membranes of gonadotrophs in the anterior pituitary, resulting in gene transcription of gonadotropin subunits and biosynthesis of LH and FSH. The gonadotropin gene transcription is modulated by the frequency and magnitude of the GnRH pulses and also by age and sex of the individual (Savoy-Moore and Swartz, 1987; Kaiser et al., 1997; Karges et al., 2003). Considering the high heritability observed for gonadotropins, the GnRH receptor is also a candidate for regulation of the genetic variance. FSH and LH act on the testis, through binding to their receptors, to promote spermatogenesis and secretion of testosterone and inhibin B. Testosterone and inhibin B act at the pituitary level to alter numbers of GnRH receptors and have hormone-specific effects on gene transcription. Testosterone also influences the hypothalamic pulse generator by altering gonadotropin pulse amplitude and frequency (Valk et al., 1980; Shupnik, 1996). The high heritability estimates observed for testosterone and inhibin B suggest that both the testicular receptor sensitivity and the hormonal feedback system could be responsible for the small variation found between twins.

In summary, the results of this study show high heritability estimates for inhibin B, FSH, LH, testosterone and SHBG in male twins and their siblings. Most likely, the heritability of these hormones is regulated at multiple levels, including the hypothalamic pulse generator, the pituitary GnRH receptor, the hormonal feedback system and the gonadal receptors. Furthermore, the significant difference in FSH and inhibin B levels between MZ and DZ twins, as observed in previous data, was not replicated in the present study.

References

An
P
Rice
T
Gagnon
J
Borecki
IB
Rankinen
T
Gu
C
Leon
AS
Skinner
JS
Wilmore
JH
Bouchard
C
, et al. 
Population differences in the pattern of familial aggregation for sex hormone-binding globulin and its response to exercise training: the HERITAGE family study
Am J Hum Biol
2001
, vol. 
13
 (pg. 
832
-
837
)
Andersson
AM
Carlsen
E
Petersen
JH
Skakkebaek
NE
Variation in levels of serum inhibin B, testosterone, estradiol, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and sex hormone-binding globulin in monthly samples from healthy men during a 17-month period: possible effects of seasons
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2003
, vol. 
88
 (pg. 
932
-
937
)
Andersson
AM
Skakkebaek
NE
Serum inhibin B levels during male childhood and puberty
Mol Cell Endocrinol
2001
, vol. 
180
 (pg. 
103
-
107
)
Balsalobre
A
Clock genes in mammalian peripheral tissues
Cell Tissue Res
2002
, vol. 
309
 (pg. 
193
-
199
)
Bartels
M
de Geus
EJ
Kirschbaum
C
Sluyter
F
Boomsma
DI
Heritability of daytime cortisol levels in children
Behav Genet
2003
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
421
-
433
)
Bartels
M
van den
BM
Sluyter
F
Boomsma
DI
de Geus
EJ
Heritability of cortisol levels: review and simultaneous analysis of twin studies
Psychoneuroendocrinology
2003
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
121
-
137
)
Bishop
DT
Meikle
AW
Slattery
ML
Stringham
JD
Ford
MH
West
DW
The effect of nutritional factors on sex hormone levels in male twins
Genet Epidemiol
1988
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
43
-
59
)
Boomsma
D
Busjahn
A
Peltonen
L
Classical twin studies and beyond
Nat Rev Genet
2002
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
872
-
882
)
Chappell
PE
White
RS
Mellon
PL
Circadian gene expression regulates pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretory patterns in the hypothalamic GnRH-secreting GT1-7 cell line
J Neurosci
2003
, vol. 
23
 (pg. 
11202
-
11213
)
Harris
JA
Vernon
PA
Boomsma
DI
The heritability of testosterone: a study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents
Behav Genet
1998
, vol. 
28
 (pg. 
165
-
171
)
Hayes
FJ
DeCruz
S
Seminara
SB
Boepple
PA
Crowley
WF
Jr
Differential regulation of gonadotropin secretion by testosterone in the human male: absence of a negative feedback effect of testosterone on follicle-stimulating hormone secretion
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2001
, vol. 
86
 (pg. 
53
-
58
)
Hoekstra
RA
Bartels
M
Boomsma
DI
Heritability of testosterone levels in 12-year-old twins and its relation to pubertal development
Twin Res Hum Genet
2006
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
558
-
565
)
Hong
Y
Gagnon
J
Rice
T
Perusse
L
Leon
AS
Skinner
JS
Wilmore
JH
Bouchard
C
Rao
DC
Familial resemblance for free androgens and androgen glucuronides in sedentary black and white individuals: the HERITAGE Family Study. Health, Risk Factors, Exercise Training and Genetics
J Endocrinol
2001
, vol. 
170
 (pg. 
485
-
492
)
Jaquish
CE
Blangero
J
Haffner
SM
Stern
MP
MacCluer
JW
Quantitative genetics of serum sex hormone-binding globulin levels in participants in the San Antonio Family Heart Study
Metabolism
1997
, vol. 
46
 (pg. 
988
-
991
)
Jenner
AA
de Koning
J
Tijssen
AM
van Rees
GP
Divergent effects on LH and FSH synthesis and release from intact female rat pituitary glands in vitro by methylxanthines, cyclic AMP derivatives and sodium fluoride
Acta Endocrinol (Copenh)
1985
, vol. 
109
 (pg. 
315
-
319
)
Jensen
TK
Andersson
AM
Hjollund
NH
Scheike
T
Kolstad
H
Giwercman
A
Henriksen
TB
Ernst
E
Bonde
JP
Olsen
J
, et al. 
Inhibin B as a serum marker of spermatogenesis: correlation to differences in sperm concentration and follicle-stimulating hormone levels. A study of 349 Danish men
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1997
, vol. 
82
 (pg. 
4059
-
4063
)
Kaiser
UB
Jakubowiak
A
Steinberger
A
Chin
WW
Differential effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency on gonadotropin subunit and GnRH receptor messenger ribonucleic acid levels in vitro
Endocrinology
1997
, vol. 
138
 (pg. 
1224
-
1231
)
Karges
B
Karges
W
de Roux
N
Clinical and molecular genetics of the human GnRH receptor
Hum Reprod Update
2003
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
523
-
530
)
Lambalk
CB
Boomsma
DI
De Boer
L
de Koning
CH
Schoute
E
Popp-Snijders
C
Schoemaker
J
Increased levels and pulsatility of follicle-stimulating hormone in mothers of hereditary dizygotic twins
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1998
, vol. 
83
 (pg. 
481
-
486
)
Lambalk
CB
de Koning
CH
Braat
DD
The endocrinology of dizygotic twinning in the human
Mol Cell Endocrinol
1998
, vol. 
145
 (pg. 
97
-
102
)
Martin
NG
Shanley
S
Butt
K
Osborne
J
O'Brien
G
Excessive follicular recruitment and growth in mothers of spontaneous dizygotic twins
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)
1991
, vol. 
40
 (pg. 
291
-
301
)
Matsumoto
AM
Bremner
WJ
Modulation of pulsatile gonadotropin secretion by testosterone in man
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1984
, vol. 
58
 (pg. 
609
-
614
)
Meikle
AW
Bishop
DT
Stringham
JD
West
DW
Quantitating genetic and nongenetic factors that determine plasma sex steroid variation in normal male twins
Metabolism
1986
, vol. 
35
 (pg. 
1090
-
1095
)
Meikle
AW
Stanish
WM
Taylor
N
Edwards
CQ
Bishop
CT
Familial effects on plasma sex-steroid content in man: testosterone, estradiol and Sex-hormone-binding globulin
Metabolism
1982
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
6
-
9
)
Meikle
AW
Stephenson
RA
Lewis
CM
Wiebke
GA
Middleton
RG
Age, genetic, and nongenetic factors influencing variation in serum sex steroids and zonal volumes of the prostate and benign prostatic hyperplasia in twins
Prostate
1997
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
105
-
111
)
Mendlewicz
J
Linkowski
P
Kerkhofs
M
Leproult
R
Copinschi
G
Van Cauter
E
Genetic control of 24-hour growth hormone secretion in man: a twin study
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1999
, vol. 
84
 (pg. 
856
-
862
)
Moore
A
Krummen
LA
Mather
JP
Inhibins, activins, their binding proteins and receptors: interactions underlying paracrine activity in the testis
Mol Cell Endocrinol
1994
, vol. 
100
 (pg. 
81
-
86
)
Neale
MC
A finite mixture distribution model for data collected from twins
Twin Res
2003
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
235
-
239
)
Neale
MC
Cardon
LR
Methodology for genetic studies in twins and families
1992
Dordrecht
Kluwer
 
The Netherlands
Pierik
FH
Vreeburg
JT
Stijnen
T
de Jong
FH
Weber
RF
Serum inhibin B as a marker of spermatogenesis
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1998
, vol. 
83
 (pg. 
3110
-
3114
)
Posthuma
D
Beem
AL
de Geus
EJ
van Baal
GC
von Hjelmborg
JB
Iachine
I
Boomsma
DI
Theory and practice in quantitative genetics
Twin Res
2003
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
361
-
376
)
Human cytokine response to ex vivo amyloid-beta stimulation is mediated by genetic factors
Twin Res Hum Genet
2005
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
132
-
137
)
Rebollo
I
de Moor
MH
Dolan
CV
Boomsma
DI
Phenotypic factor analysis of family data: correction of the bias due to dependency
Twin Res Hum Genet
2006
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
367
-
376
)
Ring
HZ
Lessov
CN
Reed
T
Marcus
R
Holloway
L
Swan
GE
Carmelli
D
Heritability of plasma sex hormones and hormone binding globulin in adult male twins
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2005
, vol. 
90
 (pg. 
3653
-
3658
)
Santen
RJ
Is aromatization of testosterone to estradiol required for inhibition of luteinizing hormone secretion in men?
J Clin Invest
1975
, vol. 
56
 (pg. 
1555
-
1563
)
Savoy-Moore
RT
Swartz
KH
Several GnRH stimulation frequencies differentially release FSH and LH from isolated, perfused rat anterior pituitary cells
Adv Exp Med Biol
1987
, vol. 
219
 (pg. 
641
-
645
)
Schermelleh-Engel
K
Moosbrugger
H
Muller
H
Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures
Methods Psychol Res
2006
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
23
-
74
)
Sheckter
CB
Matsumoto
AM
Bremner
WJ
Testosterone administration inhibits gonadotropin secretion by an effect directly on the human pituitary
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1989
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
397
-
401
)
Shupnik
MA
Gonadotropin gene modulation by steroids and gonadotropin-releasing hormone
Biol Reprod
1996
, vol. 
54
 (pg. 
279
-
286
)
Storgaard
L
Bonde
JP
Ernst
E
Andersen
CY
Spano
M
Christensen
K
Petersen
HC
Olsen
J
Genetic and Environmental Correlates of Semen Quality: A Twin Study.
Epidemiology
1996
, vol. 
17
 (pg. 
674
-
681
)
Sutcliffe
A
Spoudeas
HA
Nair
D
Bouloux
P
Oliver
T
Sambrook
P
Bannister
W
Lambalk
CB
Spector
T
Comparison of serum FSH and Inhibin B levels between adult male dizygotic and monozygotic twins
Hum Reprod
2006
, vol. 
21
 (pg. 
447
-
450
)
Valk
TW
Corley
KP
Kelch
RP
Marshall
JC
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: hormonal responses to low dose pulsatile administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1980
, vol. 
51
 (pg. 
730
-
738
)
Veldhuis
JD
Rogol
AD
Johnson
ML
Endogenous opiates modulate the pulsatile secretion of biologically active luteinizing hormone in man
J Clin Invest
1983
, vol. 
72
 (pg. 
2031
-
2040
)
Wang
JX
Kwan
M
Davies
MJ
Kirby
C
Judd
S
Norman
RJ
Risk of multiple pregnancy when infertility is treated with ovulation induction by gonadotropins
Fertil Steril
2003
, vol. 
80
 (pg. 
664
-
665
)
Wang
W
Ji
C
Peng
Z
Yang
Y
Chen
T
Li
H
Zhan
X
Wang
Y
Hu
Y
Genetic analysis of gonadotropin-gonadal axis in boys: a twin study
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue
2004
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
250
-
252
)
Wilson
JD
George
FW
Griffin
JE
The hormonal control of sexual development
Science
1981
, vol. 
211
 (pg. 
1278
-
1284
)