Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disparities in colorectal screening between US-Born and Foreign-Born populations: Evidence from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background. Over 11% of the US population in 2002 was foreign born. Studies that have examined disparities of cancer screening often focus on racial/ethnicity differences without considering their origins. This study examines the disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening between US- and foreign-born groups and explores factors associated with such disparities. Methods. Data were obtained from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Module. Multivariate logistic models were used to compare the use of CRC screening among the foreign born and 4 US-born race/ethnicity subgroups while controlling for other factors that may affect such screening. Appropriate weighting procedures were employed to account for the complex design of the survey. Results. Compared with the US-born non-Hispanic Whites, the odds ratio of ever having had a colorectal screening for the US-born Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic other races groups, and the foreign-born group with 15 or more years of residency was 0.65, 0.77, 0.98, and 0.58, respectively. An even lower odds ratio (0.46) was found among the foreign-born group with a shorter duration of residency. We found that the rate of screening for foreign-born individuals with good socioeconomic status and/or with health insurance was significantly lower than that of the US-born with similar status, and the rate was not much different from that of US-born individuals in lower socioeconomic levels. Having a usual source of care was found to be the most important protective factor for the foreign-born group. Conclusions. Foreign birth was associated with a lower rate of CRC screening. Future studies of health disparities should also consider immigration status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidley D. The Foreign-Born Population in the United States: March 2002, Current Population Reports, P20-539. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lillie-Blanton M, Hudman J. Untangling the Web: race/ethnicity, immigration, and the nation’s health. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1736–1738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ku L, Matani S. Left out: immigrants’ access to health care and insurance. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:247–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2004. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shike M, Winawer SJ, Greenwald PH, Bloch A, Hill MJ, Swaroop SV. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68:377–385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:434–437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of facal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1603–1607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecaloccult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–1471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472–1477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:154–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miler L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers, Also: update 2001—testing for early lung cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51:38–75;77-80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1704–1413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003;97:1528–1540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seeff LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer. 2004;100:2093–2103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goel MS, Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Ngo-Metzger Q, Phillips RS. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening: the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to case. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:1028–1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hedeen AN, White E, Taylor V. Ethnicity and birthplace in relation to tumor size and stage in Asian American women with breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1248–1252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Cancer for health Statistics. Data File Documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2000 [machine readable data file and documentation]. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stata Corp 2001. Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. College Station, TX. Stata Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coleman EA, O’Sullivan P. Racial differences in breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age; trends from 1987–1993 and barriers to screening. J Women Aging. 2001;13:23–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz SJ, Zemencuk JK, Hofer TP. Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic gradients persist. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:799–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strzelczyk JJ, Dignan MB. Disparities in adherence to recommended follow-up on screening mammography: interaction of sociodemographic factors. Ethn Dis. 2002;12:77–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jennings-Dozier K, Lawrence D. Sociodemographic predictors of adherence to annual cervical cancer screening in minority women. Cancer Nurs. 2000;23:350–356: 57-58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Thamer M, Richard C, Casebeer AW, Ray NF. Health insurance coverage among foreign-born US residents: the impact of race, ethnicity, and length of residence. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:96–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. DeSantis L, Halberstein R. The effects of immigration on the health care system of South Florida. Hum Organ. 1992;51:223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Siddharthan K. Health insurance coverage of the immigrant elderly. Inquiry. 1991;28:403–412.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Siddharthan K. HMO enrollment by Medicare beneficiaries in heterogeneous communities. Med Care. 1990;28:918–927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trevino FM, Moyer ME, Valdez RB, Stroup-Benham CA. Health insurance coverage and utilization of health services by Mexican Americans, mainland Puerto Ricans, and Cuban Americans. JAMA. 1991;265:233–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chavez LR, Cornelius WA, Jones OW. Mexican immigrants and the utilization of U.S. health services: the case of San Diego. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21:93–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1027–1030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindau ST, Tomori C, Lyons T, Langseth L, Bennett CL, Garcia P. The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:938–943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis TC, Dolan NC, Ferreira MR, et al. The role of inadequate health literacy skills in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Invest. 2001;19:193–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Woloshin S, Schwartz l, Katz SJ, Welch H. Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services? J Gen Intern Med. 1997. 12:472–477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Solis JM, Marks G, Garcia M, Shelton D. Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982–84. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(suppl):11–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ya-Chen Tina Shih Phd (Associate Professor)

    Present address: Section of Health Services Research, Department of Biostatistics, Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 447, 77030-4009, Houston, TX

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Health Services Research, Department of Biostatistics, Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 447, 77030-4009, Houston, TX

    Linda S. Elting Dr Ph & Bernard Levin MD

Authors
  1. Ya-Chen Tina Shih Phd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda S. Elting Dr Ph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernard Levin MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya-Chen Tina Shih Phd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shih, YC.T., Elting, L.S. & Levin, B. Disparities in colorectal screening between US-Born and Foreign-Born populations: Evidence from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. J Canc Educ 23, 18–25 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/08858190701634623

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08858190701634623

Keywords

Search

Navigation