Original Article
Discontinuation of enterostomy tube feeding by behavioral treatment in early childhood: A randomized controlled trial,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2000.108397Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether behavior therapy was more effective than nutritional therapy in obviating the need for enteral feeding in infants with resistance to feeding. Study design: Sixty-four children aged 4 to 36 months who were tube fed for at least 1 month and had resistance to feeding were randomly assigned to either behavioral or nutritional interventions (32 per group). For 7 consecutive weeks subjects and their primary feeders attended a weekly clinic with 1 of 2 dietitians followed by 4 follow-up visits. The nutritional intervention provided structured schedules and routines to stimulate the hunger/satiety cycle. The behavioral intervention provided the same schedules and routines plus behavioral therapy (extinction). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of successes, defined as infants no longer requiring tube feeding at the third follow-up visit in each group (4½ months after start of trial). The decision to discontinue tube feeding was made by an independent observer who used criteria defined before the study commencement. Results: Fifteen (47%) of 32 subjects in the behavioral group versus none in the nutritional group were successes (P <.001). Conclusion: Behavior therapy is more efficacious in eliminating the need for tube feeding than nutritional counseling alone. (J Pediatr 2000;137:498-503)

Section snippets

Subjects

Infants aged 4 to 36 months who were fed by gastrostomy or gastrojejunostomy tubes for ≥1 month and had resistance to feeding were eligible. Resistance to feeding was defined (by parental report) as (1) food refusal ≥25% of the time during each meal for ≥1 month’s duration and ≥1 problem behavior at mealtimes or (2) no attempts at oral feeding for ≥1 month because infants resisted such attempts. Resistance to feeding was then categorized into mild, moderate, or severe based on a trained

Results

At the third follow-up visit, 15 (47%) of 32 patients in behavioral therapy and 0 (0%) of 32 in nutritional therapy were no longer dependent on tube feeding (χ2 = 19.6, P =.0001; Table II).

. Successes per group at each follow-up visit

Follow-up visit No.*No. of successes (%)
Behavioral interventionNutritional interventionP value
14 (13)0 (0).04
28 (25)0 (0).002
315 (47)0 (0).000
415 (47)2 (6).000
Defined as enterostomy tube feedings not needed for ≥1 month before the visit and weight maintenance or

Discussion

This study demonstrates that a behavioral intervention is more efficacious than a nutritional intervention alone in eliminating the need for enteral tube feeding in infants with resistance to feeding. An increasing number of infants who survive because of advances in medical technology require enteral tube feeding to meet their nutritional needs but develop resistance to the reintroduction of oral feeds. Thus the availability of this treatment option could have a positive impact on the quality

Acknowledgements

We thank the study participants and Derek Stephens, MSc, statistician in the Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, for his assistance with data analysis.

References (28)

  • S. Bazyk

    Factors associated with the transition to oral feeding in infant fed by nasogastric tubes

    Am J Occup Ther

    (1990)
  • WJ DiScipio et al.

    Traumatically acquired conditioned dysphagia in children

    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

    (1978)
  • SF Dellert et al.

    Feeding resistance and gastroesophageal reflux in infancy

    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

    (1993)
  • KM. Griffin

    Swallowing training for dysphagic patients

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1979)
  • Cited by (95)

    • Weaning from a feeding tube in children with congenital heart disease: A review of the literature

      2021, Progress in Pediatric Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nowak-Cooperman & Quinn-Shea state the child must be medically able to sustain a 5–10% weight loss as well as tolerate a period of sub-optimal caloric intake and reduction of optimal fluid intake [33]. Tube weaning programs include inpatient hospital programs, which comprised the majority of articles reviewed [19–21,23–25,27,29,31–36], as well as day treatment or intensive outpatient programs [26,28], less intensive outpatient programs [3,21,22,36–39], home-based or ‘netcoaching’ programs [10,30,40], and outpatient programs with video support [18]. The duration of programs was variable, but our review of studies indicated that many programs lasted 2–4 weeks [10,14,19,21,27,29,31–34,36].

    • Long term nutritional and growth outcomes of children completing an intensive multidisciplinary tube-feeding weaning program

      2020, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      The consequences of tube dependency are externally regulated feeding in the absence of an objective medical indication, and the need for a tube withdrawal process [4,5]. Reports on tube-weaning programs in the literature are limited, and programs vary in duration and therapeutic approach including: hunger provocation [6–8], behavioral interventions [9–11], sensory stimulation [12] and medications [13]. Tube-weaning programs have been performed as inpatient [14,15], outpatient [16,17] or home-based weaning [18] with reported success rates of 40–50% [10,14] to 80–100% [6,7,15].

    • Long-term efficacy of clinical hunger provocation to wean feeding tube dependent children

      2020, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      A systematic review (SR) by Sharp et al. (2017) [11] reporting on 593 children included 6 studies regarding appetite manipulation with success rates of 44–90% at discharge [5,11,12,24,30,36,37]. Other studies not included in the SR using appetite manipulation showed short-term success rates varying from 47 to 100% [2,3,7,13,14,23,38–42]. Especially considering the high rate of previously unsuccessful other interventions to wean these challenging patients, these short-term efficacy rates may be considered to be high [24].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada, The Ontario Mental Health Foundation, and the National Health and Research Development Program.

    ☆☆

    Reprint requests: Diane Benoit, MD, Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada.

    View full text