Abstract
Here we argue that ‘charisma’, a concept widely taken up within geography and the environmental humanities, is of utility to the social studies of medicine. Charisma, we suggest, draws attention to the affective dimensions of medical work, the ways in which these affective relations are structured, and the manner in which they are intimately tied to particular material-discursive contexts. The paper differentiates this notion of charisma from Weber’s analyses of the ‘charismatic leader’ before detailing three forms of charisma – ecological (which relates to the affordances an entity has), corporeal (related to bodily interaction) and aesthetic (pertaining to an entity’s initial visual and emotional impact). Drawing on interview data, we then show how this framework can be used to understand the manner in which psychologists and neuroscientists have come to see and act on autism. We conclude the article by suggesting that examining charisma within healthcare settings furthers the concept, in particular by drawing attention to the discursive features of ecologies and the ‘non-innocence’ of charisma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair-Toteff, C. (2014) Max Weber’s charismatic prophets. History of the Human Sciences 27(1): 3–20.
Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Andrews, G. J., Chen, S. and Myers, S. (2014) The “taking place” of health and wellbeing: Towards non-representational theory. Social Science and Medicine 108: 210–222.
Bacon, D. and Borthwick, A. M. (2013) Charismatic authority in modern healthcare: The case of the “diabetes specialist podiatrist”. Sociology of Health & Illness 35(7): 1080–1094.
Barad, K. (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Callon, M. and Rabeharisoa, V. (2004) Gino’s lesson on humanity: Genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist’s role. Economy and Society 33(1): 1–27.
Clark, J. L. (2015) Uncharismatic invasives. Environmental Humanities 6: 29–52.
Despret, V. (2004) The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society 10: 111–134.
Despret, V. (2013) Responding bodies and partial affinities in human-animal worlds. Theory, Culture & Society 30(7–8): 51–76.
Despret, V. (2016) What Would Animals Say if we Asked the right Questions?. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dow, T. E. J. (1969) The theory of charisma. The Sociological Quarterly 10(3): 306–318.
Ellis, R. (2011) Jizz and the joy of pattern recognition: Virtuosity, discipline and the agency of insight in UK naturalists’ arts of seeing. Social Studies of Science 41(6): 769–790.
Featherstone, K. et al (2005) Dysmorphology and the spectacle of the clinic. Sociology of Health & Illness 27(5): 551–574.
Fitzgerald, D. (2013) The affective labour of autism neuroscience: Entangling emotions, thoughts and feelings in a scientific research practice. Subjectivity 6: 131–152.
Fitzgerald, D. (2014) The trouble with brain imaging: Hope, uncertainty and ambivalence in the neuroscience of autism. BioSocieties 9: 241–261.
Friese, C. (2013) Realizing potential in translation medicine: The uncanny emergence of care as science. Current Anthropology 54: S129–S138.
Gardner, J. (2016) Patient-centred medicine and the broad clinical gaze: Measuring outcomes in paediatric deep brain stimulation. BioSocieties. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2016.6.
Gardner, J. and Williams, C. (2015) Corporal diagnostic work and diagnostic spaces: clinicians’ use of space and bodies during diagnosis. Sociology of Health & Illness 37(5): 765–781.
Giraud, E. and Hollin, G. (2016) Care, laboratory beagles and affective utopia. Theory, Culture and Society 33(4): 27–49.
Greenhough, B. and Roe, E. (2011) Ethics, space, and somatic sensibilities: Comparing relationships between scientific researchers and their human and animal experimental subjects. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29(1): 47–66.
Haraway, D. J. (2008) When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M. B., Degen, M. and Whatmore, S. (2005) Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23(5): 643–658.
Hollin, G. J. and Pilnick, A. (2015) Infancy, autism, and the emergence of a socially disordered body. Social Science and Medicine 143: 279–286.
James, N. and Field, D. (1992) The routinization of hospice: Charisma and bureaucratization. Social Science and Medicine 34(12): 1363–1375.
Johnson, E. R. (2015) Of lobsters, laboratories, and war: Animal studies and the temporality of more-than-human encounters. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33(2): 296–313.
Kerr, E. A. and Garforth, L. (2016) Affective practices, care and bioscience: A study of two laboratories. The Sociological Review 64: 3–20.
Leys, R. (2011) The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37(3): 434–472.
Lorimer, J. (2006) What about the nematodes? Taxonomic partialities in the scope of UK biodiversity conservation. Social and Cultural Geography 7(4): 539–558.
Lorimer, J. (2007) Nonhuman charisma. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25(5): 911–932.
Lorimer, J. (2008a) Counting corncrakes: The affective science of the UK corncrake census. Social Studies of Science 38(3): 377–405.
Lorimer, J. (2008b) Living roofs and brownfield wildlife: Towards a fluid biogeography of UK nature conservation. Environment and Planning A 40(9): 2042–2060.
Lorimer, J. (2009) International conservation volunteering from the UK: What does it contribute? Oryx 43(3): 352–360.
Lorimer, J. (2015) Wildlife in the Anthropocene: Conservation after Nature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lorimer, J. (n.d.) Charisma. The Multispecies Salon. Available at: http://www.multispecies-salon.org/charisma/, accessed 6 May 2016.
Macdonald, H. (2002) “What makes you a scientist is the way you look at things”: Ornithology and the observer 1930–1955. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33(1): 53–77.
Moore, M. J. (2014) On the Spectrum: Autistics, Functioning, and Care. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz.
Murphy, M. (2015) Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 717–737.
Myers, N. (2012) Dance Your PhD: Embodied animations, body experiments, and the affective entanglements of life science research. Body & Society 18: 151–189.
Pickersgill, M. (2012) What is psychiatry? Co-producing complexity in mental health. Social Theory & Health 10(4): 328–347.
Roe, E. and Greenhough, B. (2014) Experimental partnering: Interpreting improvisory habits in the research field. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17(1): 45–57.
Scott-Samuel, A. and Smith, K. E. (2015) Fantasy paradigms of health inequalities: Utopian thinking? Social Theory & Health 13: 418–436.
Shaw, A. (2003) Interpreting images: Diagnostic skill in the genetics clinic. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9(1): 39–55.
Silverman, C. (2012) Understanding Autism: Parents, Doctors, and the History of a Disorder. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Thrift, N. (2004) Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler 86: 57–78.
Timmermans, S. (2014) Trust in standards: Transitioning clinical exome sequencing from bench to bedside. Social Studies of Science 45(1): 77–99.
Ussher, J. M. (2004) Premenstrual syndrome and self-policing: Ruptures in self-silencing leading to increased self-surveillance and blaming of the body. Social Theory & Health 2(3): 254–272.
Van Dooren, T. (2014) Flight Ways: Life and Loss at the Edge of Extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wallis, P. and Nerlich, B. (2005) Disease metaphors in new epidemics: the UK media framing of the 2003 SARS epidemic. Social Science and Medicine 60(11): 2629–2639.
Warin, M. (2014) Material feminism, obesity science and the limits of discursive critique. Body & Society 21(4): 1–29.
Weber, M. (1968) On Charisma and Institution Building Eisenstadt S.N. (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wetherell, M. (2015) Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society 21(2): 139–166.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the peer reviewers for their extensive engagement with this piece. The advice of Paul Martin, Antonia Hamilton, and Alison Pilnick throughout the project has been invaluable. This research arises, in part, from a PhD thesis funded through the Economic and Social Research Council's Open Competition (ES/I01196X/1). Subsequent support was provided via a Mildred Blaxter Post-Doctoral Fellowship from the Foundation for the Sociology of Health and Illness and an Institutional Strategic Support Fund Fellowship from the University of Leeds and The Wellcome Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hollin, G., Giraud, E. Charisma and the clinic. Soc Theory Health 15, 223–240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-016-0023-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-016-0023-0