Abstract
This article is about ambivalent dynamics of hope and uncertainty within neurobiological autism research. While much literature has commented on the positive hopes and expectations that surround technoscientific projects, fewer have focused on less promissory visions – and, in particular, on the presence of uncertainty and ambiguity among working scientists. This article shows how autism neuroscientists actually talk about their research in ambivalent, entangled registers of both promising hope and deflated uncertainty. The article locates the dynamic between these in an ‘intermediate terrain’ of autism research – in which autism is both ‘present’ as an epidemiological and social force, but also ‘ambiguous’ as a (not yet) well-defined clinical and scientific object. It argues that neuroscientists work through this terrain by drawing not only on a discourse of unalloyed hope and promise, but by entangling their research within a more complex register of ‘structured ambivalence’, which includes languages of uncertainty, deflation and low expectation. As well as showing the novelty of research within autism’s ‘intermediate terrain’, this adds to a growing literature on the ‘sociology of low expectations’, and analyses the presence of such feelings among scientific researchers particularly.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The interviews from which the empirical basis of this article draws ultimately produced around 26 hours of interview, which I partially transcribed into a corpus of 80 000 words, and which I coded as I proceeded, with affiliations (albeit progressively loose ones) to the methods of grounded theory (Charmaz, 2006), and the qualitative software, NVivo 8 (QSR International Pty Ltd., 2008).
To help orient the reader, I will attach signifiers to interview-extracts that follow. Although I do not rely heavily on these distinctions, note that the first letter of each connotes the interviewee’s relative position: ‘P’ for PhD student; ‘R’ for researcher (typically someone not long out of their PhD, such as a postdoctoral researcher); ‘L’ for lecturer (or someone in a more advanced, usually permanent position); ‘SS’ for a senior scientist (such as a professor or principal investigator); and ‘3S’ for a member of a third-sector organisation (such as an autism-related charity). Note that these distinctions are not always hard and fast, and should not be over-interpreted.
cf. Pickersgill (2011b, p. 81) where, strikingly, and in the midst of a very similar discussion, a researcher imagined psychopathy being as specifically diagnosable from anti-social behaviour as an ulcer is from general stomach ache. These parallels are unfortunately beyond the scope of the current discussion, but see Gross (2011) for a consideration of the ways in which metaphors work to bring neurological objects into particular kinds of understanding.
References
Abi-Rached, J.M. (2008) The implications of the new brain sciences. EMBO Reports 9 (12): 1158–1162.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR 4. Washington DC: Amer Psychiatric Publishing.
American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. (DSM-5) Washington DC: Amer Psychiatric Publishing.
Andreasen, N.C. (2001) Brave New Brain: Conquering Mental Illness in the Era of The Genome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anney, R. et al (2012) Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders, Human Molecular Genetics, advance online publication, 29 July, doi:10.1093/hmg/dds30.
Bailey, A. et al (1995) Autism as a strongly genetic disorder: Evidence from a British twin study. Psychological Medicine 25 (1): 63–77.
Baron-Cohen, S. et al (2009) Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study. British Journal of Psychology 194 (6): 500–509.
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. and van Lente, H. (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298.
Bröer, C. and Heerings, M. (2013) Neurobiology in public and private discourse: The case of adults with ADHD. Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (1): 49–65.
Browner, C. and Preloran, M. (2009) Neurogenetic Diagnoses: The Power of Hope and the Limits of Today’s Medicine. London: Routledge.
Brown, N. and Michael, M. (2003) A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1): 3–18.
Brown, N., Rappert, B. and Webster, A. (2000) Introducing contested futures: From looking into the future to looking at the future. In: N. Brown, B. Rappert and A. Webster (eds.) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Bumiller, K. (2008) Quirky citizens: Autism, gender, and reimagining disability. Signs 33 (4): 967–991.
Bumiller, K. (2009) The geneticization of autism: From new reproductive technologies to the conception of genetic normalcy. Signs 34 (4): 875–899.
Callard, F. and Margulies, D. (2011) The subject at rest: Novel conceptualizations of self and brain from cognitive neuroscience’s study of the ‘resting state’. Subjectivity 4 (3): 227–257.
CDC (2012) CDC features – Why are autism spectrum disorders increasing, http://www.cdc.gov/Features/AutismPrevalence/, accessed 13 July 2012.
Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
Choudhury, S., Nagel, S.K. and Slaby, J. (2009) Critical neuroscience: Linking neuroscience and society through critical practice. BioSocieties 4 (1): 61–77.
Choudhury, S. and Slaby, J. (2012) Critical neuroscience – Between lifeworld and laborator. In: J. Slaby and S. Choudhard (eds.) Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dumit, J. (2004) Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ecker, C. et al (2010) Describing the Brain in autism in five dimensions – Magnetic resonance imaging-assisted diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder using a multiparameter classification approach. Journal of Neuroscience 30 (32): 10612–10623.
Eyal, G., Hart, B., Onculer, E., Oren, N. and Rossi, N. (2010) The Autism Matrix: The Social Origins of The Autism Epidemic. London: Polity.
Feinstein, A. (2010) A History of Autism: Conversations with the Pioneers. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fitzgerald, D. (2013) The affective labour of autism neuroscience: Entangling emotions, thoughts and feelings in a scientific research practice. Subjectivity 6 (2): 131–152.
Fortun, M. (2008) Promising Genomics: Iceland and DeCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Geschwind, D.H. and Levitt, P. (2007) Autism spectrum disorders: Developmental disconnection syndromes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 17 (1): 103–111.
Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Great Britain (2009) Autism Act 2009 (c.15). London: The Stationary Office.
Gross, S. (2011) A Stone in a Spaghetti Bowl: The Biological and Metaphorical Brain in Neuro-Oncology. In: M. Pickersgill and I. van Keulen (eds.) Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences (Advances in Medical Sociology, Volume 13). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 99–119.
Gupta, A.R. and State, M.W. (2007) Recent advances in the genetics of autism. Biological Psychiatry 61 (4): 429–437.
Happé, F. and Frith, U. (eds.) (2010) Autism and Talent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Happé, F. and Ronald, A. (2008) The ‘fractionable autism triad’: A review of evidence from behavioural, genetic, cognitive and neural research. Neuropsychology Review 18 (4): 287–304.
Hedgecoe, A. (2001) Schizophrenia and the narrative of enlightened geneticization. Social Studies of Science 31 (6): 875–911.
Joyce, K. (2005) Appealing images: Magnetic resonance imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge. Social Studies of Science 35 (3): 437–462.
Kitzinger, J. (2008) Questioning hype, rescuing hope? The Hwang stem cell scandal and the reassertion of hopeful horizons. Science as Culture 17 (4): 417–434.
van Lente, H. (2000) Forceful futures: From promise to requirement. In: N. Brown, B. Rappert and A. Webster (eds.) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective techno-Science. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
van Lente, H. and Rip, A. (1998) Expectations in technological developments: An example of prospective structures to be filled by agency. In: C. Disco and B. ven der Meulen (eds.) Getting New Technologies Together. Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Lord, C. et al (1989) Autism diagnostic observation schedule: A standardized observation of communicative and social behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 19 (2): 185–212.
Lord, C. and Jones, R.M. (2012) Annual Research Review: Re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 53 (5): 490–509.
Martin, E. (2004) Talking back to neuro-reductionism. In: H. Thomas and J. Ahmed (eds.) Cultural Bodies: Ethnography and Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 190–211.
Moreira, T. and Palladino, P. (2005) Between truth and hope: On Parkinson’s disease, neurotransplantation and the production of the ‘self’. History of the Human Sciences 18 (3): 55–82.
Morrison, M. (2012) Promissory futures and possible pasts: The dynamics of contemporary expectations in regenerative medicine. BioSocieties 7 (1): 3–22.
Murray, S. (2008) Representing Autism: Culture, Narrative, Fascination. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.
Murray, S. (2011) Autism. London: Routledge.
Nature (2010) A decade for psychiatric disorders. Nature 463 (7277): 9.
Navon, D. (2011) Genomic designation: How genetics can delineate new, phenotypically diffuse medical categories. Social Studies of Science 41 (2): 203–226.
Nerlich, B. and Halliday, C. (2007) Avian flu: The creation of expectations in the interplay between science and the media. Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (1): 46–65.
Ortega, F. (2009) The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. BioSocieties 4 (4): 425–445.
Ortega, F. and Choudhury, S. (2011) Wired up differently: Autism, adolescence and the politics of neurological identities. Subjectivity 4 (3): 323–345.
Ortega, F. and Vidal, F. (eds.) (2010) Neurocultures: Glimpses into an Expanding Universe. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.
Pickersgill, M. (2011a) Promising therapies: Neuroscience, clinical practice, and the treatment of psychopathy. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (3): 448–464.
Pickersgill, M. (2011b) Ordering disorder: Knowledge production and uncertainty in neuroscience research. Science as Culture 20 (1): 71–87.
Pickersgill, M. (2011c) Neurogenetic diagnoses: The power of hope, and the limits of today’s medicine. New Genetics and Society 30 (1): 133–135.
QSR International Pty Ltd (2008) NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software, Version 8. Melbourne: QSR International Pty.
Raff, M. (2009) New routes into the human brain. Cell 139 (7): 1209–1211.
Roepstorff, A. (2004) Mapping brain mappers: An ethnographic coda. In: R.S.J. Frackowiak, J.T. Ashburner, W.D. Penny and S. Zeki (eds.) Human Brain Function. London: Elsiever 1105–1117.
Schreibman, L. (2005) The Science and Fiction of Autism. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Silverman, C. (2011) Understanding Autism: Parents, Doctors, and the History of a Disorder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Singh, I. and Rose, N. (2009) Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature 460 (7252): 202–207.
Solomon, A. (2008) The autism rights movement, New York Magazine, http://nymag.com/news/features/47225, accessed 19 July 2012.
Spencer, M.D. et al (2011) A novel functional brain imaging endophenotype of autism: The neural response to facial expression of emotion. Translational Psychiatry 1 (e19): 1–7.
Tutton, R. (2011) Promising pessimism: Reading the futures to be avoided in biotech. Social Studies of Science 41 (3): 411–429.
Vrecko, S. (2010) Birth of a brain disease: Science, the state and addiction neuropolitics. History of the Human Sciences 23 (4): 52–67.
Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P. and Pashler, H. (2009) Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4 (3): 274–290.
Williams, S.J., Katz, S. and Martin, P. (2011) Neuroscience and Medicalisation: Sociological Reflections on Memory, Medicine and the Brain. In: M. Pickersgill and I. van Keulen (eds.) Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences (Advances in Medical Sociology, Volume 13). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 231–254.
Yates, D. (2012) Neurogenetics: Unravelling the genetics of autism. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13 (6): 359–359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fitzgerald, D. The trouble with brain imaging: Hope, uncertainty and ambivalence in the neuroscience of autism. BioSocieties 9, 241–261 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.15
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.15