Abstract
There is a certain immediacy, and thus attractiveness, in the idea of encountering scientists in their natural habitat, on the laboratory floor. As ethnographers know, however, a lot of the time nothing much happens, other than the daily practices and their exigencies. The ethicist or social scientist might become more active, ask questions and point out (ethical) issues. But, even then, these only lead to minor modifications (Schuurbiers and Fisher 2009). One key point is that scientists act on many more ‘floors’ than the laboratory floor, and encounter different groups of actors, particularly when scientists are involved in the development of new technologies (Sorensen and Levold 1992). What happens on the different ‘floors’, for example in policy-making and funding, shapes what (can) happen on the laboratory floor, and how new technology and innovation will materialise in society (Rip et al. 1995; Robinson 2010).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boenink, M., Swierstra, T., and Stemerding, D. (2010) ‘Anticipating the Interaction Between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology’, Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology, 4(2): article 4; DOI:10.2202/1941–6008.1098.
CIEMDN (2011) Responsibly Onwards with Nanotechnology. Findings March 2009–January 2011 (The Hague: CIEMDN).
Conley, S. N. (2011) ‘Engagement Agents in the Making: On the Front Lines of Socio-technical Integration. Commentary on: “Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies” ’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4): 715–21.
Deuten, J. J., Rip, A., and Jelsma, J. (1997) ‘Societal Embedding and Product Creation Management’, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9(2): 131–48.
Dewey, J. (1920) Reconstruction in Philosophy (15th ed.) (Boston: Beacon Press).
Dewey, J. (1938) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).
Dewey, J. (1957) Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology (New York: The Modern Library).
Dijstelbloem, H. (2007) De democratie anders: Politieke vernieuwing volgens dewey en latour (Enschede: Iskamp).
Fesmire, S. (2003) John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
Garud, R. and Ahlstrom, D. (1997) ‘Technology Assessment: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(1): 25–48.
Hildebrand, D. L. (2008) Dewey: A Beginner’s Guide (Oxford: Oneworld Publications).
Parandian, A. (2012) Constructive TA of Newly Emerging Technologies. Stimulating Learning by Anticipation Through Bridging Events (Delft: Technical University of Delft).
Rip, A. and Shelley-Egan, C. (2010) ‘Positions and responsibilities in the “real” world of nanotechnology’, in von Schomberg, R. and Davies, S. R. (eds) Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies, Options for Framing Public Policy (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).
Rip, A. and Talma, A. S. (1998) ‘Antagonistic Patterns and New Technologies’, in Disco, C. and van der Meulen, B. (eds) Getting New Technologies Together (pp. 299–323) (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
Rip, A., Misa, T. J., Schot, J. (1995) ‘Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment’ (London/New York: Pinter).
Robinson, D. K. R. (2010) Constructive Technology Assessment of Newly Emerging Nanotechnologies (Enschede: Iskamp Drukkers BV).
Schuurbiers, D. and Fisher, E. (2009) ‘Lab-scale Intervention’, Embo Reports. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research, 10(5): 424–7.
Sorensen, K. H. and Levold, N. (1992) ‘Tacit Networks, Heterogeneous Engineers, and Embodied Technology’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17(1): 13–35.
Swierstra, T. and Waelbers, K. (2012) ‘Designing a Good Life: A Matrix for the Technological Mediation of Morality’, Engineering Ethics, 18(1): 157–72.
Te Kulve, H. (2011) Anticipatory Interventions and the Co-evolution of Nanotechnology and Society (Enschede: Iskamp Drukkers, BV).
Van Merkerk, R. (2007) Intervening in Emerging Nanotechnologies, a CTA of Lab-on-a-chip Technology (Utrecht: Utrecht University).
Welchmann, J. (1995) Dewey’s Ethical Thought (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Lotte Krabbenborg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krabbenborg, L. (2013). Dramatic Rehearsal on the Societal Embedding of the Lithium Chip. In: van der Burg, S., Swierstra, T. (eds) Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43407-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00293-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)