Abstract
A powerful application of conversation analysis (CA) is to re-examine features of verbal communication diagnostically associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (e.g., apparent problems with conversation, echolalia, idiosyncratic language). In this data-driven tutorial chapter, Muskett draws on his experiences as an academic psychologist and clinical speech and language therapist to lead the reader through the following questions. First, how do we undertake CA with ASD data, and with what methodological assumptions? Second, what are the broad theoretical implications of the kinds of findings that are generated when CA is used in this way? And finally, how might these findings be applied to underpin real-world practice across a range of clinical, educational, and social care contexts?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beeke, S., Johnson, F., Beckley, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., et al. (2014). Enabling better conversations between a man with aphasia and his conversation partner: Incorporating writing into turn taking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 292–305.
Billig, M. (1999). Conversation analysis and claims of naivety. Discourse and Society, 10, 572–576.
Bilmes, J. (1992). Mishearings. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
Danforth, S. (2002). New words for new purposes: A challenge for the AAMR. Mental Retardation, 40, 21–24.
Dunn, M., Gomes, H., & Sebastian, M. (1996). Prototypicality of responses of autistic, language disordered, and normal children in a word fluency task. Child Neuropsychology, 2, 99–108.
Garcia, A. C. (2012). Medical problems where talk is the problem: Current trends in conversation analytic research on aphasia, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and Alzheimer’s. Sociology Compass, 6(4), 351–364.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 338–360). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 115–131.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lesson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moseley, R., Mohr, B., Lombardo, M. V., Baron-Cohen, S., Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2013). Brain and behavioral correlates of action semantic deficits in autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 725.
Muskett, T. (2016). Examining language and communication in autism spectrum disorder—In context. In K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallett, & S. Timimi (Eds.), Re-thinking autism: Diagnosis, identity and equality (pp. 300–316). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Muskett, T., Body, R., & Perkins, M. (2012). Uncovering the dynamic in static assessment interaction. Child Language Teaching Therapy, 28, 87–99.
Muskett, T., Body, R., & Perkins, M. (2013). A discursive psychology critique of semantic verbal fluency assessment and its interpretation. Theory & Psychology, 23(2), 205–226.
Potter, J., & te Molder, H. (2005). Talking cognition: Mapping and making the terrain. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 1–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1991). Semantic processing in the free recall of autistic children: Further evidence for a cognitive deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 417–430.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work: Studies in corpus linguistics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Volden, J., & Lord, C. (1991). Neologisms and idiosyncratic language in autistic speakers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 109–130.
Recommended Reading
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, C., & White, S. (2000). Practising reflexivity in health and welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muskett, T. (2017). Using Conversation Analysis to Assess the Language and Communication of People on the Autism Spectrum: A Case-Based Tutorial. In: O'Reilly, M., Lester, J., Muskett, T. (eds) A Practical Guide to Social Interaction Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. The Language of Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59236-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59236-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59235-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59236-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)