Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Law as a Source of Stigma or Empowerment: Legal Capacity and Persons with Intellectual Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intellectual Disability and Stigma

Abstract

While the law is generally portrayed as a tool to combat stigma, outdated legal institutions continue to reinforce negative stereotypes about persons with intellectual disabilities. This chapter describes how guardianship is based on misconceptions regarding the abilities of persons with disabilities and how these false assumptions lead to abuse and denials of autonomy. Supported decision-making is presented as an alternative approach that does not deny the agency of persons with disabilities and in fact leads to strengthening their skills. In order to replace guardianship with supported decision-making, large-scale social reform is necessary in which the law can play an important part. The widely ratified Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities provides impetus for such legal reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bach, M., & Kerzner, L. (2010). A new paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal Capacity. (Paper prepared for the Law Commission of Ontario).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, T. (2012). Guardianship, “social” citizenship, & theorizing substitute decision-making law. Sydney Law School Research Paper, 12/25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanda, A. (2007). Legal capacity in the disability rights convention: Stranglehold of the past or lodestar for the future? Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 34, 429–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala-Butora, J. (2013). Disabling torture: The obligation to investigate ill-treatment of persons with disabilities. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 45, 214–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala-Butora, J. (2015). Reconstructing personhood: Legal capacity of persons with disabilities. SJD Dissertation, Harvard Law School, MA, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala-Butora, J., Stein, M. A., & Lord, J. E. (2014). The democratic life of the Union: Towards equal voting participation for Europeans with disabilities. Harvard International Law Journal, 55, 71–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. M. (2000). The emergence of assisted (supported) decision-making in the Canadian law of adult guardianship and substitute decision-making. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 23, 61–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hungarian Civil Liberties Union [Társaság a Szabadságjogokért, TASZ]. (2012). Választójog és fogyatékosság [Suffrage and Disability]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBgao8ZklGY

  • Kohn, N. A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Campbell, A. T. (2013). Supported decision-making: A viable alternative to guardianship? Penn State Law Review, 117, 1111–1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, J. E., & Stein, M. A. (2013). Contingent participation and coercive care: Feminist and communitarian theories of disability and legal capacity. In B. McSherry & I. Freckelton (Eds.), Coercive care: Rights, law and policy. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mental Disability Advocacy Center (MDAC). (2013). Legal Capacity in Europe. Retrieved from http://mdac.info/sites/mdac.info/files/legal_capacity_in_europe.pdf

  • Minkowitz, T. (2010). Abolishing mental health laws to comply with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In B. McSherry & P. Weller (Eds.), Rethinking rights based mental health laws. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. (1993). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary. Kehl am Rhein, Germany: N.P. Engel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, L. (2011). Guardianship for persons with mental illness—A legal and appropriate alternative? Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law and Policy, 4, 279–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szegediné Dr., & Sebestyén, K. (1982). A gondnokság alá helyezés iránti perekről [About guardianship proceedings]. Magyar Jog, 7, 606–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (2007). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Resolution. Adopted by the General Assembly, 24 January 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Legislation

  • Kiss v. Hungary, No. 38832/06 (Eur. Ct. Hum. Rts., May 20, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plesó v. Hungary, No. 41242/08 (Eur. Ct. Hum. Rts., October 2, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salontaji-Drobnjak v. Serbia, no. 36500/05 (Eur. Ct. Hum. Rts., October 13, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sýkora v. the Czech Republic, No. 23419/07 (Eur. Ct. Hum. Rts., 22 November 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • X. v. Croatia, no 11223/04, (Eur. Ct. Hum. Rts., July 17, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    J. Fiala-Butora & M. A. Stein

Authors
  1. J. Fiala-Butora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Fiala-Butora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom

    Katrina Scior

  2. Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Shirli Werner

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fiala-Butora, J., Stein, M.A. (2016). The Law as a Source of Stigma or Empowerment: Legal Capacity and Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. In: Scior, K., Werner, S. (eds) Intellectual Disability and Stigma. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52499-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation