Ability of Different Physical Activity Monitors to Detect Movement During Treadmill Walking

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study assessed the ability of four different activity monitors to discriminate changes in treadmill walking velocity. The relationships between walking velocity and bodily movement and between bodily movement and energy expenditure determined by indirect calorimetry (IC-EE or METs) were determined. Twenty-eight subjects walked at 3.2, 4.0, 4.8, 5.6, and 6.4 km/h (0 % grade) for 30 min on separate occasions. The Tritrac-R3D (TT), Computer Science & Applications, Inc. (CSA), and Mini-Logger® (ML) activity monitors that measure bodily acceleration in one or three planes, and a Yamax Digiwalker-500® (YX) that records footsteps, were secured at the waistline of each subject. CSA monitors were also worn at the wrist and ankle. Walking velocity and bodily movement were significantly related (r = 0.89 to 0.93) for TT, CSA, ML, and YX. Importantly, changing each walking velocity produced significant changes in bodily movement that was detected by each monitor. Bodily movement and IC-EE were significantly related for TT, CSA, ML, and YX (r = 0.47 to 0.94). Compared to IC-EE, and at all walking speeds, EE was significantly overestimated by the TT, and EE was significantly underestimated by the YX. These results indicate that the activity monitors can differentiate bodily movement associated with walking at slow speeds better than they can estimate energy expenditure associated with walking at slow speeds.

References

• 1 Bassett D R, Ainsworth B E, Leggett S R, Mathien C A, Main J A, Hunter D C, Duncan G E. Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;  28 1071-1077
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bassett D R, Ainsworth B E, Swartz A M, Strath S J, O'Brien W L, King G A. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 S471-S480
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Bouten C V, Westerterp K R, Verduin M, Janssen J D. Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;  26 1616-1623
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Computer Science and Applications Inc .Activity Monitor Operator's Manual. Model 7164. Shalimar, FL;
  Google Scholar
• 6 Fogelholm M, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Nenonen A, Pasanen M. Effects of walking training on weight maintenance after a very-low-energy diet in pre-menopausal obese women.  Arch Intern Med. 2000;  160 2177-2184
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Freedson P S, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications Inc. accelerometer.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 777-781
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Haymes E M, Byrnes W C. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry.  Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1993;  25 1365-1369
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P. Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.  Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2000;  32 S442-S449
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Jakicic J M, Winters C, Lagally K, Ho J, Robertson R J, Wing R R. The accuracy of the Tritrac-R3D accelerometer to estimate energy expenditure.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;  31 747-754
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Jakicic J M, Polley B A, Wing R R. Accuracy of self-reported exercise and the relationship with weight loss in overweight women.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 634-638
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Jakicic J M, Wing R R, Butler B A, Robertson RJ. Prescribing exercise in multiple bouts versus one continuous bout: effects on adherence, cardiorespiratory fitness and weight loss in overweight women.  Int J Obes. 1995;  19 893-901
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Leenders N YJM, Sherman W M, Nagaraja H N, Kien C L. Evaluation of methods to assess physical activity in free-living conditions.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;  33 1233-1240
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Masse L C, Fulton J E, Watson KL, Heesch K C, Kohl I II , Blair S N, Tortolero S R. Detecting bouts of physical activity in a field setting.  Res Quar Exerc Sport.. 1999;  70 212-219
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Melanson EL Jr, Freedson P S. Validity of the Computer Science and Applications Inc. (CSA) activity monitor.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;  27 934-940
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Nichols J F, Morgan C G, Chabot L E, Sallis J F, Calfas K J. Assessment of physical activity with the computer science and applications Inc. accelerometer: Laboratory versus field validation.  Res Quart Exerc Sport. 2000;  71 36-43
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Nichols J F, Morgan C G, Sarkin J A, Sallis J F, Calfas K J. Validity, reliability and calibration of the Tritrac accelerometer as a measure of physical activity.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;  31 908-912
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Pate R R, Pratt M, Blair S N, Haskell W L, Macera C A, Bouchard C, Buchner D, Ettinger W, Heath G W, King A C, Kriska A, Leon A S, Marcus B H, Morris J, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Patrick K, Pollock M L, Rippe J M, Sallis J F, Wilmore J H. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.  JAMA. 1995;  273 402-407
  Google Scholar
• 19 Servais S B, Webster J G, Montoye H J. Estimating human energy expenditure using an accelerometer device.  J Clin Eng. 1984;  9 159-170
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Sherman W M, Morris D M, Kirby T E, Petosa R A, Smith B A, Frid D J, Leenders N. Evaluation of a commercial accelerometer (Tritrac-R3D) to measure energy expenditure during ambulation.  Int J Sports Med. 1998;  19 43-47
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Sirard J R, Melanson E L, Li L, Freedson P S. Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Applications Inc. physical activity monitor.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 695-700
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Swartz A M, Strah S J, Bassett D R, O'Brien W L, King G A, Ainsworth B E. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites.  Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2000;  32 S450-S456
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Trost S, Ward D S, Moorehead S M, Watson P D, Riner W, Burke J R. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 629-633
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Troutman S R, Allor K M, Hartmann D C, Pivamik J M. Mini-Logger® reliability and validity for estimating energy expenditure and heart rate in adolescents.  Res Quart Exerc Sport. 1999;  70 70-74
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Tryon W W, Williams R. Fully proportional actigraphy: A new instrument.  Behav Res Methods Instr Comp. 1996;  28 392-403
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services .Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 1996
  Google Scholar
• 27 de Weir J BV. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism.  J Physiol. 1949;  109 1-9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Welk G J, Blair S N, Wood K, Jones S, Thompson R W. A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.  Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2000;  32 S489-S497
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

1 Computer Science and Applications (CSA) monitor is acquired by:Manufactoring Technology Incorporated (MTI)709 Anchors StreetFort Walton Beach, FL32548

N. Y. J. M. Leenders, PhD

The Ohio State University · General Clinical Research Center

S-1099 Rhodes Hall · 450 W. 10th Avenue · Columbus, OH 43210 · USA ·

Phone: +1-614-293-6689

Fax: +1-614-293-3796

Email: leenders.1@osu.edu