A Five-Year International Review Process Concerning Terminologies, Definitions, and Related Issues around Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Over the past decade there has been an increasing realization about the extent of confusion associated with the many terminologies used to describe abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). This led to the organization of an international workshop of 35 experts from 15 countries in Washington, D.C., USA, in 2005, which addressed the confusions and controversies around AUB. The workshop comprehensively addressed anomalies in the terminologies, definitions, and causes of AUB. It also began to address broader issues including investigations, quality of life, the need for structured symptom questionnaires, cultural aspects, and future research needs. This workshop led to a series of recommendations and publications and to the establishment of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Menstrual Disorders Working Group. Since then, a series of international presentations and small group workshops has resulted in a wide awareness of the program and a comprehensive series of recommendations and publications. A particularly influential large-scale interactive workshop with 600 attendees was held during the 2009 FIGO World Congress, which demonstrated the broad acceptability of the current recommendations. This article describes the process leading to the development of international recommendations on terminologies, definitions, and classification of causes of AUB and the establishment of the FIGO Menstrual Disorders Working Group.

REFERENCES

• 1 Fraser I S, Inceboz U S. Defining disturbances of the menstrual cycle. In: O'Brien P MS, Cameron I, MacLean A B, eds. Disorders of the Menstrual Cycle. London, UK: RCOG Press; 2000: 141-152
  Google Scholar
• 2 Woolcock J G, Critchley H O, Munro M G, Broder M S, Fraser I S. Review of the confusion in current and historical terminology and definitions for disturbances of menstrual bleeding.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  90 (6) 2269-2280
  Google Scholar
• 3 Fraser I S, Critchley H O, Munro M G, Broder M. Writing Group for this Menstrual Agreement Process . A process designed to lead to international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  87 (3) 466-476
  Google Scholar
• 4 Fraser I S, Critchley H O, Munro M G, Broder M. Can we achieve international agreement on terminologies and definitions used to describe abnormalities of menstrual bleeding?.  Hum Reprod. 2007;  22 (3) 635-643
  Google Scholar
• 5 Fretheim A, Schünemann H J, Oxman A D. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes.  Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;  4 17
  Google Scholar
• 6 Bayer S R. Standardizing the descriptive terminology of abnormal menstrual bleeding: it is time we talk the same talk.  Fertil Steril. 2007;  87 (3) 477-478
  Google Scholar
• 7 Brook R H, Chassin M R, Fink A, Solomon D H, Kosecoff J, Park R E. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.  Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;  2 (1) 53-63
  Google Scholar
• 8 Hemingway H, Crook A M, Feder G et al.. Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 (9) 645-654
  Google Scholar
• 9 Park R E, Fink A, Brook R H et al.. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.  Am J Public Health. 1986;  76 (7) 766-772
  Google Scholar
• 10 Vader J P, Pache I, Froehlich F et al.. Overuse and underuse of colonoscopy in a European primary care setting.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 (5) 593-599
  Google Scholar
• 11 Shekelle P G, Park R E, Kahan J P, Leape L L, Kamberg C J, Bernstein S J. Sensitivity and specificity of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to identify the overuse and underuse of coronary revascularization and hysterectomy.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;  54 (10) 1004-1010
  Google Scholar
• 12 Fraser I S, Critchley H O, Munro M G. Abnormal uterine bleeding: getting our terminology straight.  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  19 (6) 591-595
  Google Scholar
• 13 Munro M G, Critchley HO D, Fraser I S. The flexible FIGO classification for underlying causes of abnormal uterine bleeding.  Semin Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 391-399
  Google Scholar
• 14 Heikinheimo O, Munro M G, Fraser I S. The need for investigations to elucidate causes and effects of abnormal uterine bleeding.  Semin Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 410-422
  Google Scholar
• 15 Munro M G, Broder M, Critchley HODC, Matteson K, Haththotuwa R, Fraser I S. An international response to questions about terminologies, investigation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding: use of an audience responder system.  Semin Reprod Med. 2011;  29 (5) 436-445
  Google Scholar

Hilary O.D. CritchleyM.D. 

MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute

47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK

Email: hilary.critchley@ed.ac.uk