Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars

doi:10.1054/ijom.2001.0057

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volume 30, Issue 4, August 2001, Pages 306-312

https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2001.0057 Get rights and content

Abstract

Abstract.

In a prospective study 1106 impacted mandibular third molars were removed from 687 patients. Clinical, radiographic, and surgical factors were recorded. Postoperatively, we examined the modalities of common sensation in order to assess sensory deficit. The patients were followed up, until complete restitution occurred, or, if the sensibility failed to recover, for at least 6 months. A total of 3.6% of the operated sides demonstrated impairment of labial sensation, and 2.1% of lingual sensation. The vast majority of these disturbances subsided completely during the follow-up period. The incidence of persisting sensory diminution after 6 months was 0.91% for the inferior alveolar, and 0.37% for the lingual nerve. However, the degree of the persisting deficit was slight in most instances. The relationship between the recorded factors and the alteration of sensation was analysed by using the χ²test. For the inferior alveolar nerve we found the patient's age, the development of the roots, the degree of impaction, and the radiographic position of the nerve canal to be significantly correlated to sensory deficit, as well as the surgical procedures in the depth of the socket and the intraoperative opening of the mandibular canal. As far as the lingual nerve is concerned, general anaesthesia and the individual operator were the main factors predictive of nerve damage.

References (34)

CC Alling
Dysesthesia of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following third molar surgery
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1986)
FA Carmichael et al.
Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group study
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1992)
AF Fielding et al.
Lingual nerve paresthesia following third molar surgery. A retrospective clinical study
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Oral Endod
(1997)
WG Flick
The third molar controversy: framing the controversy as a public health policy issue
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1999)
JE Kiesselbach et al.
Clinical and anatomic observations on the relationship of the lingual nerve to the third molar region
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1984)
DP Kipp et al.
Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1377 surgical procedures
JADA
(1980)
TC Krafft et al.
Clinical investigation into the incidence of direct damage to the lingual nerve caused by local anaesthesia
J Cranio Maxillo Fac Surg
(1994)
DA Mason
Lingual nerve damage following lower third molar surgery
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1988)
RG Merrill
Prevention, treatment, and prognosis for nerve injury related to the difficult impaction
Dent Clin North Am
(1979)
TP Osborn et al.
A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1985)

MA Pogrel et al.

Gore-Tex tubing as a conduit for repair of lingual and inferior alveolar nerve continuity defects: a preliminary report

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

(1998)

JP Rood et al.

The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg

(1990)

DT Wofford et al.

Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

(1987)

CG Black

Sensory impairment following lower third molar surgery: a prospective study in New Zealand

N Z Dent J

(1997)

CW Blackburn et al.

Lingual nerve damage associated with the removal of lower third molars

Br Dent J

(1989)

RA Bruce et al.

Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery

J Am Dent Assoc

(1980)

WJ Deighan

Anesthesia and paresthesia of the lower lip following oral surgical procedures

Tufts Dental Outlook

(1947)

Cited by (162)

Risk factors observed in 2-dimensional radiographs for permanent injury of the inferior alveolar nerve after removal of mandibular third molars: a case-control study
2023, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
To assess whether differences exist in signs observed in 2D radiographs of mandibular third molars between a case group of patients with and a control group without permanent sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) after removal.
Three observers blinded to patient status assessed radiographs from the case group (n=162) and the control group (n=172). Two new signs, craniocaudal relation of the roots and the mandibular canal and position of the canal over the roots; and 4 “classic” signs, interruption of the white borders of the canal, darkening of the roots, narrowing of the canal lumen, and diversion of the canal over the roots were registered. Chi-square tests assessed differences in distribution of radiographic signs between the groups. Odds ratios expressed the association between radiographic signs and permanent sensory disturbance. Inter- and intraobserver reliability values were calculated.
We found significantly more teeth with roots positioned inferiorly to the canal borders (P<0.001; OR 4.1-5.3) and with the canal superimposed over the upper or middle third of the roots (P<0.001; OR 2.6-3.9) in the case group than in the control group. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for roots inferior to the canal borders and fair to good for canal superimposition.
Two radiographic signs are valid predictors of permanent sensory disturbance of the IAN in 2D radiographs.
Safety and efficacy of adjunctive therapy in the treatment of odontogenic keratocyst: a systematic review
2023, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
The odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is a common cystic lesion in the jaw. Its management, however, is highly debated with no consensus on the best treatment option. Clinicians base their approach on treatment efficacy and associated morbidity. Management often consists of enucleation with peripheral ostectomy and adjunctive therapy to prevent recurrence. The aim of our systematic review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these different modalities. Embase, Medline, and Cochrane were searched according to the PRISMA guidelines for articles that presented non-syndromic patients with histopathologically confirmed OKC treated with 5-fluorouracil (5FU), Carnoy’s solution (CS), or modified Carnoy’s solution (MCS) as adjunctive therapy after enucleation and peripheral ostectomy. The outcomes of interest were safety (measured as adverse events) and efficacy (expressed as recurrence). Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Four studies were included and 62 patients were evaluated. The results show that recurrence occurred only in patients treated with MCS. Reported adverse events were mostly limited to paraesthesia that could be permanent (in the CS and MCS treatment groups) or transient (across all adjunctive therapies). With the prohibition of CS, both MCS and 5FU are promising replacement adjunctive therapies. From a safety and efficacy perspective we consider 5FU, which was associated with the lowest recurrence and fewest adverse events, to be the most viable option. More high-evidence prospective studies, such as randomised controlled trials, with a longer follow-up period are necessary to draw definite conclusions.
Is Surgical Repair With Nerve Allograft More Cost-Effective Than Non-Surgical Management for Persistent Trigeminal Neuropathy? Initial Assessment With Markov Model
2023, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Persistent trigeminal neuropathy (PTN) is associated with high rates of depression, loss of work, and decreased quality of life (QoL). Nerve allograft repair can achieve functional sensory recovery in a predictable manner; however, it bears significant upfront costs. In patients suffering from PTN, is surgical repair with allogeneic nerve graft, when compared to non-surgical therapy, a more cost-effective treatment option?
A Markov model was constructed with TreeAge Pro Healthcare 2022 (TreeAge Software, Massachusetts) to estimate the direct and indirect costs for PTN. The model ran for 40 years with 1-year-cycles on a 40-year-old model patient with persistent inferior alveolar or lingual nerve injury (S0 to S2+) at 3 months without signs of improvement, and without dysesthesia or neuropathic pain (NPP). The 2 treatment arms were surgery with nerve allograft versus non-surgical management. There were 3 disease states, functional sensory recovery (S3 to S4), hypoesthesia/anesthesia (S0 to S2+), and NPP. Direct surgical costs were calculated using the 2022 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and verified with standard institutional billing practices. Non-surgical treatment direct costs (follow-up, specialist referral, medications, imaging) and indirect costs (QoL, loss of employment) were determined from historical data and the literature. Direct surgical costs for allograft repair were $13,291. State-specific direct costs for hypoesthesia/anesthesia were $2,127.84 per year, and $3,168.24 for NPP per year. State-specific indirect costs included decreased labor force participation, absenteeism, and decreased QoL.
Surgical treatment with nerve allograft was more effective and had a lower long-term cost. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was −10,751.94, indicating surgical treatment should be utilized based on efficiency and cost. With a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000, the net monetary benefits of surgical treatment are $1,158,339 compared to $830,654 for non-surgical treatment. With a standard threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 50,000, the sensitivity analysis shows that surgical treatment would remain the preferred choice based on efficiency even if surgical costs were doubled.
Despite high initial costs of surgical treatment with nerve allograft for PTN, surgical intervention with nerve allograft is a more cost-effective treatment option when compared to non-surgical therapy.
Radiographic factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve exposure during mandibular third molar surgery and their influence on neurosensory deficit: A prospective study
2022, Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research
The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) can occasionally be observed in the extraction socket of the mandibular third molar (M3M) intraoperatively. Exposure of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgery primarily depends upon the absence of bony cortex between the canal and root of impacted third molar or either by existence of a very thin cortical lining between two which gets broken during luxation of tooth. Accurate anatomical relationship of inferior alveolar canal with root apex of impacted (M3M) and the location of canal can be determined by Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Initially 200 patients evaluated by Orthopantomogram (OPG) for anatomical relationship of IAN with impacted (M3M) and various radiographic risk factors for nerve injury. Among these 200, 75 showed the presence of two or more than two risk factors for IAN injury which then were further evaluated by using CBCT for presence or absence of cortex of canal and location of canal on buccal, lingual, inferior, and interradicular position.
Cortex of canal is an important barrier between the root apex and inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle. Interruption of cortex on CBCT, the interradicularly and lingually positioned neurovascular bundle become a strong affirmation for intra operative nerve exposure during (M3M) surgery. Although its exposure is affected by various factors such as bone density, sex and age of patient, surgeon's expertise, operative tissue damage, post operative edema, surgical procedure, but neurosensory deficit do not occur simply after the exposure of neurovascular bundle.
Management of inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve injuries in the UK – a cross-sectional study
2022, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Post operative nerve injury following mandibular third molar (M3M) potentially impacts a significant number of patients. A lack of consensus for the management of trigeminal nerve injuries exists. It is important to know how clinicians manage these injuries, and how confidently. A 16-question online survey using SurveyMonkey was developed and sent to all current UK members of three oral srelated societies (ABAOMS, BAOS and BAOMS) from January 2021 to March 2021. The survey consisted of open free text, binomial and variable scale responses related to the management of inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve injuries. A total of 158 clinicians responded to the survey. The average number of M3M removed monthly over the last three years by a clinician was 25. The average number of nerve injuries seen in a clinician’s practice, within the last three years, was three. Over two-thirds of respondents were only somewhat confident, not so confident, or not at all confident in the management of patients with inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerve (LN) injury. In occurrence of an injury, only 45% stated they would make an onward referral and a minority of clinicians had access to surgical repair within their own unit. Free text responses highlighted themes of a lack of UK awareness of management interventions and pathways for these patients. Clear national guidance on managing trigeminal nerve injuries was a commonly desired theme from responding clinicians. Joint speciality partnerships and a national nerve repair registry is now required.
Retrospective evaluation of sensory neuropathies after extraction of mandibular third molars with confirmed “high-risk” features on cone beam computed topography scans
2022, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
The objective of this study was to identify the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury after extraction of mandibular third molars with confirmed “high-risk” features on cone beam computed topography scans and establish any risk factors that significantly increase the chances of sustaining an IAN injury.
This study is a retrospective analysis of outcomes after surgical extraction of 500 mandibular third molars over a 5-year period. All teeth showed signs of contact with or compression of the IAN on cone beam computed topography scans.
The overall incidence of IAN injury was 6.6%, with permanent neuropathies accounting for 1.8% within this high-risk cohort. Statistically significant factors shown to increase the risk of nerve injury included increasing age (P = .002), compression of the nerve evident on cone beam computed topography scan (P = .005), and buccal or interradicular position of the nerve (P = .042).
Results indicate a low incidence of IAN injury, particularly given the high-risk nature of all teeth that were extracted. It highlights the benefits of cone beam computed topography scans in surgical planning. These data are an important contribution to the existing literature and valuable in the consent procedure for patients undergoing surgical removal of mandibular third molars in contact with the IAN.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Clinical PapersSensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars

Abstract

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Oral Endod

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

JADA

J Cranio Maxillo Fac Surg

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Dent Clin North Am

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Sensory impairment following lower third molar surgery: a prospective study in New Zealand

N Z Dent J

Lingual nerve damage associated with the removal of lower third molars

Br Dent J

Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery

J Am Dent Assoc

Anesthesia and paresthesia of the lower lip following oral surgical procedures

Tufts Dental Outlook

Clinical Papers
Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars