Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 126, Supplement 1, January 2004, Pages S114-S123
Gastroenterology

Outcome assessment
Symptom severity and QOL scales for urinary incontinence

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.059Get rights and content

Abstract

Symptoms of incontinence are common, particularly among older people, and incontinence can have a severe effect on the quality of life of some individuals at any age. A number of treatments are available, most of which aim to reduce the occurrence of incontinent episodes or to limit the effects of the disorder on everyday life. In research and clinical practice, it is essential that the symptoms and effects of incontinence be properly assessed and recorded. The only valid means of measuring patients’ perspectives is through the use of psychometrically robust self-report questionnaires. Incontinence may be experienced as part of the symptom complex of a range of conditions (e.g., benign prostatic diseases or fistulas), and the effect of incontinence on quality of life varies depending on the severity of the condition and other psychosocial and medical factors. Questionnaires with acceptable levels of psychometric testing are identified and recommended for use in clinical practice and research investigations according to the following categories: (1) questionnaires to assess symptoms of incontinence, (2) generic health-related quality-of-life questionnaires to assess the effect of incontinence on quality of life, and (3) incontinence-specific measures to assess the effect and bothersomeness of incontinence on quality of life.

Section snippets

Relationships between questionnaires and clinical measures

The relationship among urinary symptoms, the results of urodynamic investigations, and quality-of-life impairment is complex. Each of these parameters is important in the assessment of patients with urinary incontinence, and it is tempting to speculate that they might be related in direct and meaningful ways. On the whole, however, few and weak relationships have been found between the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (including incontinence) and clinical measures, including the results

Recommended questionnaires

Self-completed questionnaires are the most suitable method for assessing patients’ perspectives on incontinence and its effect on quality of life. Questionnaires may be long and detailed for use in research, but they need to be short and easy to use to be relevant for clinical practice. In addition to being valid and reliable, they need to be easy to complete, and if they are being used to measure outcome, they should be sensitive to change. Developing a new questionnaire and testing it

Conclusion

Much progress has been made in recent years in the development and testing of questionnaires to assess symptoms and quality of life related to urinary incontinence. Researchers are strongly encouraged to use the recommended questionnaires identified in this article in clinical research. These instruments have achieved basic standards of sound psychometric properties necessary in self-report instruments. Investigators are also encouraged to publish findings on the reliability, validity, and

References (79)

  • R. Brooks

    EuroQolthe current state of play

    Health Policy

    (1996)
  • G. Kobelt

    Economic considerations and outcome measurement in urge incontinence

    Urology

    (1997)
  • N. Fleshner et al.

    The artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy incontinenceimpact on urinary symptoms and quality of life

    J Urol

    (1996)
  • D. Watkins-Bruner et al.

    RTOG’s first quality of life study—RTOG 90–20a phase II trial of external beam radiation with etanidazole for locally advanced prostate cancer

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1995)
  • D.L. Patrick et al.

    Quality of life of women with urinary incontinencefurther development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL)

    Urology

    (1999)
  • F. Haab et al.

    Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup

    J Urol

    (1997)
  • S. Boyarsky et al.

    New look at bladder neck obstruction by the Food and Drug Administration regulators

    Am Assoc Genitourinary Surg

    (1977)
  • M.L. Slevin et al.

    Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

    Cancer

    (1988)
  • C. Coscarrelli-Schag et al.

    Karnofsky performance status revisitedreliability, validity and guidelines

    J Clin Oncol

    (1984)
  • R.A. Pearlman et al.

    Quality of life in chronic diseasesperceptions of elderly patients

    J Gerontol

    (1988)
  • J.F. Wyman et al.

    The urinary diary in evaluation of incontinent womena test-retest analysis

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1988)
  • C. Barnick

    Frequency volume chart

  • J.J.M.C. de la Rosette et al.

    Relationships between lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstructionresults from the ICS-BPH study

    Neurourol Urodyn

    (1998)
  • K.E. el Din et al.

    Reliability of the International Prostate Symptom Score in the assessment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and/or benign prostatic hyperplasia

    J Urol

    (1996)
  • J.M. Reynard et al.

    The ICS-“BPH” studyuroflowmetry, lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction

    Br J Urol

    (1998)
  • C. Norton

    The effects of urinary incontinence in women

    Int Rehabil Med

    (1982)
  • S. Hunskaar et al.

    The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1991)
  • J.S. Uebersax et al.

    Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in womenthe Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory

    Neurourol Urodyn

    (1995)
  • J.F. Wyman et al.

    Psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence in women

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1987)
  • J.L. Donovan et al.

    Symptom and quality of life assessment

  • J.L. Donovan et al.

    Symptom and quality of life assessment

  • S.A. Shumaker et al.

    Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinencethe Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory

    Qual Life Res

    (1994)
  • D.P. Lubeck et al.

    A health related quality of life measure for use in patients with urge urinary incontinencea validation study

    Qual Life Res

    (1999)
  • C.J. Kelleher et al.

    A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1997)
  • H. Sandvik et al.

    Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey

    J Epidemiol Community Health

    (1993)
  • T. Hald et al.

    A patient weighted symptom score system in the evaluation of uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia

    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl

    (1991)
  • J.L. Donovan et al.

    The ICS-“BPH” Studythe psychometric validity and reliability of the ICSmale questionnaire

    Br J Urol

    (1996)
  • S. Jackson et al.

    The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnairedevelopment and psychometric testing

    Br J Urol

    (1996)
  • N. Black et al.

    Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women

    Neurourol Urodyn

    (1996)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Moroccan version of the incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QoL) in urinary incontinence patients

      2020, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
      Citation Excerpt :

      The International Scientific Committee has recommended investigating the quality of life (QOL) for incontinence sufferers [11]. The Standardization Committee of the ICS [12] suggested that the most valid way of measuring the presence, severity, and impact of a symptom or condition on patient's activities and well-being, is through the use of well-constructed, reliable and sensitive questionnaires studying quality of life (QOL) [2,13]. The role of quality of life questionnaires has been widely demonstrated to be useful in clinical practice to assess the effects on individual lives due to discomfort, embarrassment, withdrawal from social life, and interpersonal relationship disruptions.

    • Use of a Closed Diurnal Indwelling Catheter for Patients With Spinal Cord Disorders: A Pilot Study

      2020, Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For study participants who completed the 24-week intervention and requested continued use, CDIC is an alternative that successfully addressed these concerns. Standardized questionnaires were selected to include both adult- and pediatric-validated measures as well as those previously applied in male and female individuals with spinal cord pathology, NGB, and urinary incontinence.17-22 Of note, there was an early significant decrease in physical limitations related to bladder function with CDIC.

    • Psychometric performance of the incontinence quality-of-life questionnaire among patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence

      2013, Clinical Therapeutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A large body of evidence has shown that OAB has a tremendous personal and societal impact.2 However, this impact is not well captured by more proximal measures of bladder function such as laboratory tests, urodynamic tests, and other clinical measures.3–7 Increased awareness of the importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including symptoms, functional status, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has made way for the inclusion of such measures to monitor the course of OAB and its treatment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text