Original Investigation
Burden of Care and Quality of Life Among Caregivers for Adults Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: A Systematic Review

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.006Get rights and content

Rationale & Objective

Dialysis is a burdensome and complex treatment for which many recipients require support from caregivers. The impact of caring for people dependent on dialysis on the quality of life of the caregivers has been incompletely characterized.

Study Design

Systematic review of quantitative studies of quality of life and burden to caregivers.

Setting & Study Population

Caregivers of adults receiving maintenance dialysis.

Selection Criteria for Studies

The Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from inception until December 2016 for quantitative studies of caregivers. Pediatric and non–English language studies were excluded. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Data Extraction

2 independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data using a prespecified extraction instrument.

Analytical Approach

Descriptive reports of demographics, measurement scales, and outcomes. Quantitative meta-analysis using random effects when possible.

Results

61 studies were identified that included 5,367 caregivers from 21 countries and assessed the impact on caregivers using 70 different scales. Most (85%) studies were cross-sectional. The largest identified group of caregivers was female spouses who cared for recipients of facility-based hemodialysis (72.3%) or peritoneal dialysis (20.6%). Caregiver quality of life was poorer than in the general population, mostly comparable with caregivers of people with other chronic diseases, and often better than experienced by the dialysis patients cared for. Caregiver quality of life was comparable across dialysis modalities.

Limitations

Heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures made comparisons between studies difficult and precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Study quality was generally poor.

Conclusions

Quality of life of caregivers of dialysis recipients is poorer than in the general population and comparable to that of caregivers of individuals with other chronic diseases. The impact of caring for recipients of home hemodialysis or changes in the impact of caring over time have not been well studied. Further research is needed to optimally inform dialysis programs how to educate and support caregivers.

Section snippets

Search Strategy and Inclusion Criteria

A prespecified search strategy (Item S1) was used to identify studies published before January 1, 2017, that reported the burden or QoL of caregivers of dialysis (facility HD, home HD, or PD) patients. Electronic databases including The Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE were systematically searched with an English language restriction. Unpublished studies were identified, when possible, by abstracts of conference proceedings, as well as reference lists of relevant

Literature Search and Study Characteristics

The search strategy yielded 1,072 articles, of which 86 underwent full-text review (Fig 1). Another 25 were excluded, leaving 61 papers meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria (Tables 1 and S1). There were 17 studies published before 200024, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 44 from 2000 to December 2016.17, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79,

Discussion

This systematic review has found that caregiver QoL and burden is worse than in the general population and comparable to caregivers of patients with other chronic diseases. Depression is less common than among the cared for dialysis patients and comparable or slightly greater than for the general population. Furthermore, the impact on caregiving for facility HD patients is similar to that of PD patients. QoL is better for caregivers of transplant recipients than dialysis patients.

Despite the

Article Information

Authors’ Full Names and Academic Degrees

Elise L. Gilbertson, MBBS(Hons), Rathika Krishnasamy, PhD, Celine Foote, PhD, Alice L. Kennard, MBBS(Hons), Meg J. Jardine, PhD, and Nicholas A. Gray, MBBS.

Authors’ Contributions

Research idea and study design: NAG, MJJ; data acquisition: ELG, CF, ALK, NAG; data analysis/interpretation: RK, NAG, ELG; statistical analysis: RK; supervision or mentorship: NAG, RK, MJJ. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring

References (90)

  • U. Avsar et al.

    Psychological and emotional status, and caregiver burden in caregivers of patients with peritoneal dialysis compared with caregivers of patients with renal transplantation

    Transplant Proc

    (2013)
  • U. Avsar et al.

    Caregiver burden, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality differences in caregivers of hemodialysis patients compared with renal transplant patients

    Transplant Proc

    (2015)
  • A. Tong et al.

    Establishing core outcome domains in hemodialysis: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (2017)
  • M.H. Cantor

    Strain among caregivers: a study of experience in the United States

    Gerontologist

    (1983)
  • P.R. Sherwood et al.

    Caregiver burden and depressive symptoms: analysis of common outcomes in caregivers of elderly patients

    J Aging Health

    (2005)
  • R. Schulz et al.

    Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • S.C. McMillan et al.

    Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial

    Cancer

    (2006)
  • W.E. Haley et al.

    Psychological, social, and health consequences of caring for a relative with senile dementia

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1987)
  • C. Rainville et al.

    Family Caregiving and Out-of-Pocket Costs: 2016 Report

    (November 2016)
  • W.M. McClellan et al.

    Social support and subsequent mortality among patients with end-stage renal disease

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (1993)
  • R.L. Morton et al.

    The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

    BMJ

    (2010)
  • R.W. Evans et al.

    The quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1985)
  • O.U. Iyasere et al.

    Quality of life and physical function in older patients on dialysis: a comparison of assisted peritoneal dialysis with hemodialysis

    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol

    (2016)
  • R. Saran et al.

    US Renal Data System 2017 Annual Data Report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States

    Am J Kidney Dis

    (2018)
  • J. Gilg et al.

    UK Renal Registry 17th Annual Report: chapter 1 UK renal replacement therapy incidence in 2013: national and centre-specific analyses

    Nephron

    (2015)
  • ANZDATA Registry. The 39th Annual ANZDATA Report (2016), Chapter 4: Haemodialysis. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis...
  • Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Organ Replacement Register Annual Report: Treatment of End-Stage...
  • T. Asti et al.

    The experiences of loneliness, depression, and social support of Turkish patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and their caregivers

    J Clin Nurs

    (2006)
  • M. Wyld et al.

    A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments

    PLoS Med

    (2012)
  • Wells GAS, O'Connell B, Peterson D, Welch JV, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the...
  • A. Stang

    Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses

    Eur J Epidemiol

    (2010)
  • L.S. Rotenstein et al.

    Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    JAMA

    (2016)
  • A.E. Blogg et al.

    Levels and predictors of distress in home hemodialysis caregivers

    Dial Transplant

    (1999)
  • S.A. Dunn et al.

    Quality of life for spouses of CAPD patients

    ANNA J

    (1994)
  • F.O. Finkelstein et al.

    Assessment of marital relationships of hemodialysis patients

    Am J Med Sci

    (1976)
  • S. Page et al.

    Marital and family characteristics of home and hospital dialysis patients

    Loss Grief Care

    (1991)
  • K.J. Peterson

    Psychosocial adjustment of the family caregiver: home hemodialysis as an example

    Social Work Health Care

    (1985)
  • E.M. Rideout et al.

    Stress, social support, and symptoms of depression in spouses of the medically ill

    Int J Psychiatry Med

    (1990)
  • S.Z. Schoeneman et al.

    Personality variables in coping with the stress of a spouse's chronic illness

    J Clin Psychol

    (1983)
  • S. Simone

    Multi-dimensional assessment of the effects of dialysis on the marital relationship

    Dissertation Abstracts International

    (1986)
  • V. Soskolne

    The effect of ethnic origin on personality resources and psychophysiological health in a chronic stress situation: the case of spouses of dialysis patients

    Israel J Psychiatry Relat Sci

    (1984)
  • V. Soskolne et al.

    Psychosocial adjustment of home hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hospital dialysis patients and their spouses

    Nephron

    (1987)
  • R.H. Srivastava

    Coping strategies used by spouses of CAPD patients

    ANNA J

    (1988)
  • M.N. Wicks et al.

    Subjective burden and quality of life in family caregivers of patients with end stage renal disease

    ANNA J

    (1997)
  • B. Brackney

    The impact of hemodialysis on the marital dyad

    J Marital Family Ther

    (1979)
  • Cited by (85)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Complete author and article information provided before references.

    View full text