Regular Article
Techniques for performing caesarean section

https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2000.0147Get rights and content

Abstract

In many countries caesarean section has become the mode of delivery in over a quarter of all births. Safety of the mother and cost are the two main areas of concern. Various studies on the techniques of performing a caesarean section have focused on reducing the operating time, blood loss, wound infection and cost. Given the fact that caesarean section is the most commonly performed operation in obstetrics, it is important that trainers and trainees are familiar with the basic surgical techniques and that best practice is followed. At the same time surgeons should take necessary precautions to reduce their risk of exposure to Hepatitis B and HIV.

The skin incision and entry into abdominal cavity is best achieved by the modified Cohen's incision. The lower segment transverse uterine incision has stood the test of time over a period of 75 years and remains the best way to enter the uterus. Closure of the uterus in single layer appears to be acceptable, whenever technically possible. Placental delivery should be by controlled cord traction after spontaneous expulsion. Closure of the visceral and parietal layers of the peritoneum no longer seems to be necessary. Obliteration of space in the subcutaneous layer, either by suture or by suction, seems to reduce wound disruption. These issues are being considered in the CAESAR randomized controlled trial of surgical techniques currently underway in England.

Prophylactic antibiotics are mandatory in preventing post-operative morbidity. Many of the above mentioned steps have been tested in randomized trials. Further studies are needed to examine a wide range of questions arising from this review, e.g. best position of the patient, the value of exteriorization of the uterus whilst repairing the uterus, and the use of agents to relax the uterus in difficult deliveries.

References (135)

  • JG Boyle et al.

    T and J vertical extensions in low transverse Cesarean births

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1996)
  • RW Naef et al.

    Trial of labour after caesarean delivery with a lower segment, vertical incision: is it safe?

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1995)
  • TD Shipp et al.

    Intrapartum uterine rupture and dehiscence in patients with prior lower uterine segment vertical and transverse incisions

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1999)
  • M David et al.

    Nitroglycerin to facilitate fetal extraction during Cesarean delivery

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1998)
  • DA Fuller et al.

    Extensor tendon lacerations in a preterm neonate

    Journal of Hand Surgery

    (1999)
  • S Ishii et al.

    Blunt-edged, notched scalpel for Cesarean incision

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1999)
  • CM McCurdy et al.

    The effect of placental management at Cesarean delivery on operative blood loss

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1992)
  • CM McCurdy et al.

    The effect of placental management at Cesarean delivery on operative blood loss

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1992)
  • DS Lasley et al.

    The effect of placental removal method on the incidence of postcesarean infections

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1997)
  • MW Atkinson et al.

    The effect of manual removal of the placenta on post-caesarean endometritis

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1996)
  • JC Hauth et al.

    Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1992)
  • SJ Chapman et al.

    One- versus two-layer closure of a low transverse Cesarean: the next pregnancy

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1997)
  • A Cetin et al.

    Superficial wound disruption after Cesarean delivery: effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue

    International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    (1997)
  • R Briggs et al.

    Postoperative incision complications after Cesarean section in patients with antepartum syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP): does delayed primary closure make a difference?

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1996)
  • DE Rizk et al.

    Systematic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective Cesarean delivery

    International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    (1998)
  • AA Rouzi et al.

    The routine use of cefazolin in Cesarean section

    International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    (2000)
  • LA Dickason et al.

    Red blood cell transfusion and caesarean section

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1992)
  • C Cotzias et al.

    Patient demand for caesarean section

  • TJ Broadhead et al.

    Worldwide utilization of caesarean section

    Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review

    (1995)
  • EB Keeler et al.

    Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and Cesarean section

    Milbank Quarterly

    (1993)
  • J Drife

    Maternity services: the Audit Commission Report

    British Medical Journal

    (1997)
  • RM Kirk

    Surgical Techniques and Technology

  • RP Brown

    Knotting technique and suture materials

    British Journal of Surgery

    (1992)
  • E JC van Rijssel et al.

    Tissue reaction and surgical knots: the effect of suture size, knot configuration and knot volume

    Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1989)
  • WF Rayburn et al.

    Refinements in performing a Cesarean delivery

    Gynecology and Obstetric Surgery

    (1996)
  • FC Chen et al.

    Atopy, the use of condoms, and a history of Cesarean delivery: potential predisposing factors for latex sensitization in pregnant women

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1999)
  • M Doyle et al.

    The effectiveness of double gloving in obstetrics and gynaecology

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1992)
  • H Matta et al.

    Does wearing two pairs of gloves protect operating theatre staff from skin contamination

    British Medical Journal

    (1989)
  • J Madar et al.

    Surfactant-deficient respiratory distress after elective delivery at ‘term’

    Acta Paediatrica

    (1999)
  • JR Smith et al.

    The incidence of glove puncture during caesarean section

    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1990)
  • JR Smith et al.

    Reducing the risk of infections in obstetricians: reducing the risk of needlestick injury

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1991)
  • C Wilkinson et al.

    Lateral tilt for caesarean section

    The Cochrane Library

    (2000)
  • R Matorras et al.

    Lack of benefits of left tilt in emergent Cesarean sections: a randomised study of carditocography, cord acid-base status and other parameters of the mother and the fetus

    Journal of Perinatal Medicine

    (1998)
  • IE Nygaard et al.

    Abdominal incisions from creation to closure

    Gynecology and Obstetric Surgery

    (1996)
  • H Ellis

    Commentary: midline abdominal incisions

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1984)
  • KW Murphy

    Reducing the complications of caesarean section

  • EF Magann et al.

    Preoperative skin preparation and intraoperative pelvic irrigation: impact on post-Cesarean endometritis and wound infection

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1993)
  • J Mowat et al.

    Abdominal wound dehiscence after Cesarean delivery

    British Medical Journal

    (1971)
  • MM Biswas

    Why not Pfannenstiel's incision?

    Obstetrics and Gynecology

    (1973)
  • H Ellis et al.

    Abdominal incisions—vertical or transverse?

    Postgraduate Medical Journal

    (1984)
  • Cited by (0)

    f1

    Address for correspondence: Clinical Governance Support Office, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Ward 58, Maternity Unit, Newcastle Road, Stoke on Trent ST4 6QG, UK.

    View full text