Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do gender and race affect decisions about pain management?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if patient gender and race affect decisions about pain management.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Experimental design using medical vignettes to evaluate treatment decisions. A convenience sample of 111 primary care physicians (61 men, 50 women) in the Northeast was asked to treat 3 hypothetical patients with pain (kidney stone, back pain) or a control condition (sinusitis). Symptom presentation and severity were held constant, but patient gender and race were varied.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The maximum permitted doses of narcotic analgesics (hydrocodone) prescribed at initial and return visits were calculated by multiplying mg per pill × number of pills per day × number of days × number of refills. No overall differences with respect to patient gender or race were found in decisions to treat or in the maximum permitted doses. However, for renal colic, male physicians prescribed higher doses of hydrocodone to white versus black patients (426 mg vs 238 mg), while female physicians prescribed higher doses to blacks (335 mg vs 161 mg; F1,85=9.65, P=.003). This pattern was repeated for persistent kidney stone pain. For persistent back pain, male physicians prescribed higher doses of hydrocodone to males versus females (406 mg vs 201 mg), but female physicians prescribed higher doses to females (327 mg vs 163 mg; F1,28=5.50, P=.03).

CONCLUSION: When treating pain, gender and racial differences were evident only when the role of physician gender was examined, suggesting that male and female physicians may react differently to gender and/or racial cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calderone JL. The influence of gender on the frequency of pain and sedative medication administered to postoperative patients. Sex Roles. 1990;23:713–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cleeland CS, Gronin R, Hatfield AK, et al. Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:592–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald DD. Gender and ethnic stereotyping and analgesic administration. Res Nurs Health. 1994;17:5–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knox H, Todd KH, Samaroo N, Hoffman JR. Ethnicity as a risk factor for inadequate emergency department analgesia. JAMA. 1993;296:1537–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ng B, Dimsdale JE, Rollnik JD, Shapiro H. The effect of ethnicity on prescriptions for patient-controlled analgesia for post-operative pain. Pain. 1996;66:9–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng B, Dimsdale JE, Shragg GP, Deutsch R. Ethnic differences in analgesic consumption for postoperative pain. Psychosom Med. 1996;58:125–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med. 1993;329:478–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Poses RM, Smith WR, Schmitt BP, Alexander-Forti D, Cebul RD, Wigton RS. Do women and men receive different care for sore throats? Motiv Res. 1995;19:193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burns RB, McCarthy EP, Freund KM, et al. Black women receive less mammography even with similar use of primary care. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:173–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sleath B, Svarstad B, Roter D. Patient race and psychotropic prescribing during medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;34:227–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians’ recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:618–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elderkin-Thompson V, Waitzkin H. Differences in clinical communication by gender. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:112–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:1464–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald DD, Bridge GR. Gender stereotyping and nursing care. Res Nurs Health. 1991;14:373–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians’ referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:279–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalichman SC, Kelly JA, Hunter TL, Murphy DA, Tyler R. Culturally tailored HIV-AIDS risk-reduction messages targeted to African-American urban women: impact on risk sensitization and risk reduction. J Consulting Clin Psychol. 1993;61:291–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol S. Weisse PhD.

Additional information

This project was funded by a Union College Faculty Research Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weisse, C.S., Sorum, P.C., Sanders, K.N. et al. Do gender and race affect decisions about pain management?. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 211–217 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004211.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004211.x

Key Words

Navigation