Skip to main content
Log in

Physicians’ experiences with patients who transgress boundaries

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Boundary violations have been discussed in the literature, but most studies report on physician transgressions of boundaries or sexual transgressions by patients. We studied the incidence of all types of boundary transgressions by patients and physicians’ responses to these transgressions.

METHODS: We surveyed 1,000 members of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) for the number of patient transgressions of boundaries which had occurred in the previous year. Categories were created by the investigators based on the literature. Physicians picked the most important transgression, and then were asked about their response to the transgression and its effect on the patient-physician relationship. Attitudinal questions addressed the likelihood of discharging patients who transgressed boundaries. The impact of demographic variables on the incidence of transgressions was analyzed using analysis of variance.

RESULTS: Three hundred thirty (37.5%) randomly selected SGIM members responded to the survey. Almost three quarters of the respondents had patients who used their first name, while 43% encountered verbal abuse, 39% had patients who asked personal questions, 31% had patients who were overly affectionate, and 27% encountered patients who attempted to socialize. All other transgressions, including physical abuse and attempts at sexual contact, were uncommon. Only gender affected the incidence of transgressions; female physicians encountered more personal questions (P=.001), inappropriate affection (P < .005), and sexually explicit language (P < .05) than male physicians and responded more negatively to boundary transgressions. Respondents dealt with transgressions by discussion with the patient or colleagues or by ignoring the incident, but such transgressions generally had a negative impact on the relationship. Most physicians would discharge patients who engaged in physical abuse or attempts at sexual contact, but were more tolerant of verbal abuse and overly affectionate patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Boundary transgressions by patients is common, but usually involves more minor infractions. Female physicians are more likely to encounter certain types of transgressions. The incidence and outcomes of such transgressions are important in assisting physicians to deal effectively with this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gabbard GO, Nadelson C. Professional boundaries in the physicianpatient relationship. JAMA. 1995;273:1445–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackshaw SL, Miller JB. Boundaries in clinical psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:293. Letter.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strasburger LH, Jorgenson L, Sutherland P. The prevention of psychotherapist sexual misconduct: avoiding the slippery slope. Am J Psychotherapy. 1992;46:544–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zinn WM. Doctors have feelings too. JAMA. 1988;259:3296–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McDaniel SH, Campbell TL, Seaburn D. Family-oriented Primary Care. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990:361–73.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wood B, Talmon M. Family boundaries in transition: a search for alternatives. Fam Proc. 1983;22:347–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. AMA. Sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1991;266:2741–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO. The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk-management dimensions. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150:188–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gartrell NK, Milliken N, Goodson WH, Thiemann S, Lo B. Physicianpatient sexual contact. Prevalence and problems. West J Med. 1992;157:139–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutheil TG. Borderline personality disorder, boundary violations, and patient-therapist sex: medicolegal pitfalls. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146:597–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon RI. Sexual exploitation of patients: how it begins before it happens. Psychiatr Ann. 1989;19:104–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lehrman NS. Pleasure heals. The role of social pleasure—love in its broadest sense—in medical practice. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:929–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kardener SH. Sex and the physician-patient relationship. Am J Psychiatry. 1974;131:1134–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schulte HM, Kay J. Medical students’ perceptions of patient-initiated sexual behavior. Acad Med. 1994;69:842–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gartrell N, Herman J, Olarte S, Feldstein M, Localio R. Psychiatristpatient sexual contact: results of a national survey. I: Prevalence. Am J Psychiatry. 1986;143:1126–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cook DJ, Griffith LE, Cohen M, Guyatt GH, O’Brien B. Discrimination and abuse experienced by general internists in Canada. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:565–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradshaw S, Burton P. Naming: a measure of relationships in a ward milieu. Bull Menninger Clin. 1976;40:665–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sparr LF, Rogers JL, Beahrs JO, Mazur DJ. Disruptive medical patients. Forensically informed desicion-making. West J Med. 1992;156:501–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil J. Farber MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farber, N.J., Novack, D.H., Silverstein, J. et al. Physicians’ experiences with patients who transgress boundaries. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 770–775 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.90734.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.90734.x

Key words

Navigation