Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the expectations that patients and their physicians have for outcomes after surgical treatment for sciatica and to examine the associations between expectations and outcomes.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

SETTING/PATIENTS: We recruited 273 patients, from the offices of orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and occupational medicine physicians in Maine, who had diskectomy for sciatica.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients’ and physicians’ expectations were measured before surgery. Satisfaction with care and changes in symptoms and functional status were measured 12 months after surgery. More patients who expected a shorter recovery time after surgery were “delighted,” “pleased,” or “mostly satisfied” with their outcomes 12 months after surgery than patients who expected a longer recovery time (odds ratio [OR] 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 4.4). Also, more patients who preferred surgery after learning that sciatica could get better without surgery had good symptom scores 12 months after surgery than patients who did not prefer surgery (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.2, 7.0). When physicians predicted a “great deal of improvement” after surgery, 39% of patients were not satisfied with their outcomes and 25% said their symptoms had not improved.

CONCLUSIONS: More patients with favorable expectations about surgery had good outcomes than patients with unfavorable expectations. Physicians’ expectations were overly optimistic. Patient expectations appear to be important predictors of outcomes, and eliciting them may help physicians identify patients more likely to benefit from diskectomy for sciatica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Kreuter W. Low back pain hospitalization: recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine. 1994;19:1207–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Clinical Policies. Park Ridge, Il: The Academy; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Acute Low Back Pain Problems in Adults, Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, Md: AHCPR; December 1994. AHCPR publication 95-0642.

  4. Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:598–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmann RM, Wheeler KJ, Deyo RA. Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:487–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Volinn E, Turczyn KM, Loeser JD. Patterns in low back pain hospitalizations: implications for the treatment of low back pain in an era of health care reform. Clin J Pain. 1994;10:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beecher HK. Surgery as placebo. JAMA. 1961;176:1102–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brody H. Placebo effect: an examination of Grünbaum’s definition. In: White L, Tursky B, Schwartz GE, eds. Placebo: Theory, Research, and Mechanisms. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1985:37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roberts AH, Kewman DG, Mercier L, et al. The power of nonspecific effects in healing: implications for psychosocial and biological treatments. Clin Psychol Rev. 1993;13:375–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keller RB, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, et al. The Main Lumbar Spine Study, part I: background and concepts. Spine. 1996;21:1769–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, et al. The Main Lumbar Spine Study, part II: one-year outcomes of surgical and non-surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:1787–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Street JH, Barlow W. Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen primary care using patients own criteria. Spine. 1996;21:2900–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain, part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8:141–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation: a controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine. 1983;8:131–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by grants from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (HS-06344 and HS-08194 to The Back Pain Outcome Assessment Team and HS-06813-04 to The Main Medical Assessment Foundation Dissemination Project).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, G.K., Butzlaff, M.E., Atlas, S.J. et al. The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J GEN INTERN MED 14, 740–744 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.10417.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.10417.x

Key Words

Navigation