Skip to main content
Log in

Medical student name tags

Identification or obfuscation?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To explore how U.S. medical students doing clinical rotations are physically identified to patients via their name tags, and how patients interpret the educational status conveyed by those name tags.

Measurements and main results

A letter was sent to the dean of students at all 141 medical school campuses in the United States, requesting a photocopy of the name tag distributed to third-year students on clinical rotations. We then surveyed a convenience sample of 100 general medicine outpatients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center and presented them with examples of four ways medical students were identified on name tags we received: “medical student,” “student physician,” “student doctor,” and “MD student.” Patients were then asked to rank these, and three other identifiers (“faculty physician,” “resident physician,” and “house staff”), from least experienced to most experienced. Patients were told that some of the identifiers might denote the same level of experience. Fifty-three percent of the medical school name tags we received identified the medical student as “medical student,” 11% as “student,” 6% as “student physician,” 2% as “student doctor,” and 1% as “MD student.” Four percent of name tags had only the studient’s name, and 18% had only the student’s name and university affiliation. Patients thought that the four student descriptors (“medical studient,” “student physician,” “student doctor,” and “MD student”) on medical studient name tags indicated less experience than the other three descriptors. However, of the four student descriptors, patients thought “medical student” indicated less experience than the other three (p<.0001).

Conclusions

There is great variation in how medical schools identify medical students on the name tags used during their clinical rotations. These different ways of identifying medical students are not interpreted as being identical to many patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annas GJ. The Rights of Patients: The Basic ACLU Guide to Patient Rights, 2nd ed. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press: 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen DL, McCullough LB, Kessel RWI, et al. Informed consent policies governing medical students’ interactions with patients. J Med Educ. 1987;62:789–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen DL, Kessel RWI, McCullough LB. Informed consent and the “medical student psychiatrist”. Acad Med. 1990;65:127–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen DL, Kessel RWI, McCullough LB. Pelvic examinations by medical students. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(4):1013–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen DL, McCullough LB, Kessel RWI, et al. A national survey concerning the ethical aspects of informed consent and role of medical students. J Med Educ. 1988;63:821–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawton FG, Redman CWE, Luesley DM. Patient consent for gynecological examination. Br J Hosp Med. 1990;44(5):326–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams CT, Fost N. Ethical considerations surrounding first time procedures: a study and analysis of patient’s attitudes toward spinal taps by students. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1992;(3):217–31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kapp MB. Legal implications of clinical supervision of medical students and residents. J Med Educ. 1983;58:293–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarnowski AAJ, Glasser ML, Lindstrom R. Patient’s responses to involvement in medical education. In: 23rd Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Washington, DC: 1983:125–31.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Ubel is a Measey Foundation Faculty Fellow and a recipient of a Career Development Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.

Supported in part by a grant from the Annenberg Public Policy Foundation through its support of the Center for Bioethics’ Project on Informed Consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silver-Isenstadt, A., Ubel, P.A. Medical student name tags. J GEN INTERN MED 12, 669–671 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07138.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07138.x

Key words

Navigation