Original Article
Analysis of stress in the metatarsals

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9584.1998.00104.xGet rights and content

Summary

Shear and normal stresses throughout the second, third, fourth and fifth metatarsals under various loading conditions were determined mathematically using standard techniques from the theory of mechanics of solids. Anatomical data was obtained by CAT scanning the foot of a 20-year-old man at 5 mm increments. For each segment, the horizontal and vertical co-ordinates of points were determined along the outer and inner surfaces of the bone cross sections. Using this data, the stress was calculated throughout each cross-section for a load applied at the metatarsal head in the frontal plane at every 15° interval between the horizontal and the vertical directions. Maximum tensile stress occurred in the second metatarsal in the cross-sections 3.0 cm and 4.0 cm from the proximal end, and were the result of a vertical load. The maximum tensile stress in the third metatarsal occurred in the cross section 3.5 cm from the proximal end, as a result of a horizontal load applied on the lateral side. A similar loading produced the maximum tensile stress in the fourth metatarsal, at a distance of 3.0 cm from the proximal end. The maximum tensile stress in the fifth metatarsal occurred 3.5 cm from the proximal end, as a result of a load applied on the lateral side in a direction slightly inclined to the horizontal. The findings of this study closely relate to the incidence and location of metatarsal stress fractures.

References (18)

  • ArcanM et al.

    A fundamental characteristic of the human foot, the foot ground pressure pattern

    J Biomech

    (1976)
  • SalatheEP et al.

    A biomechanical model of the foot

    J Biomech

    (1986)
  • ArangioGA et al.

    A biomechanical study of stress in the fifth metatarsal

    Clin Biomech

    (1997)
  • RichliWR et al.

    Avulsion fracture of the fifth metatarsal: experimental study of pathomechanics

    Am J Radiol

    (1984)
  • JonesR

    Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal by indirect violence

    Ann Surg

    (1902)
  • ArangioGA

    Proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal (Jones fracture): two cases treated by cross-pinning and a review of 106 cases

    Foot Ankle

    (1983)
  • LawrenceSJ et al.

    Jone's fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal

    Foot Ankle

    (1993)
  • DeLeeJC et al.

    Stress fractures of the fifth metatarsal

    Am J Sports Med

    (1983)
  • Wilson MajEJ et al.

    Stress fractures: an analysis of 250 consecutive cases

    Radiology

    (1969)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Archery and the arm

    2023, Behaviour in our Bones: How Human Behaviour Influences Skeletal Morphology
  • Prospective study of biomechanical risk factors for second and third metatarsal stress fractures in military recruits

    2019, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
    Citation Excerpt :

    A more abducted (toe-out) foot orientation has also been found to increase medially-directed horizontal ground reaction force.22 Since it has been demonstrated that the third metatarsal is more sensitive to horizontal than vertical loads,6 greater abduction may also be influential on injury risk through a direct influence on loading of the metatarsal, likely effecting both bending and torsional loading. The later forefoot loading may also be associated with arch collapse, consistent with a foot type which exhibits forefoot abduction.

  • Three-dimensional impact kinetics with foot-strike manipulations during running

    2017, Journal of Sport and Health Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although measurement of 3D kinetics is common, examining impact characteristics in each axis independently and in combination via the 3D resultant may provide more comprehensive insight into the magnitude and direction of applied forces.2 High-frequency shear forces applied to the structures of the fore- and mid-foot, including the metatarsal heads, plantar fascia, and toe flexor muscles, may highlight contrasting mechanisms of injury in each respective foot-strike pattern relative to rear-foot strike.2,11,15 Thus, the location, direction, magnitude, and patterns of force application are each considered important in understanding the implications of foot-strike manipulations, potentially relocating the site of injury rather than mitigating the cause.

  • Stress Fractures of the Foot

    2015, Clinics in Sports Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    A recent study found that MT length did not correlate with peak plantar loading pressure.23,24 A study investigating loading conditions of the lesser MT found that maximum stress occurred within 3 to 4 cm of the proximal end of the lesser MT. This area generally corresponds to the typical location of stress fracture.25 Although the first MT fracture is typically found proximally, the second to fourth MTs usually fracture in midshaft or more distally.

  • The relationship between lower-extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: A systematic review

    2011, Clinical Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The horizontal component of the GRF may be important in stress fractures as well (Dixon et al., 2006). For example, the force bearing capacity of the third metatarsal is shown to be less in the horizontal direction compared to the vertical direction (Arangio et al., 1998). As a result, measurement of all components of the external forces is required, particularly for the risk analysis of metatarsal stress fractures.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text