Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Perceived and observed neighborhood indicators of obesity among urban adults

Abstract

Objective:

The global obesity epidemic has been partially attributed to modern environments that encourage inactivity and overeating, yet few studies have examined specific features of the physical neighborhood environment that influence obesity. Using two different measurement methods, this study sought to identify and compare perceived and observed neighborhood indicators of obesity and a high-risk profile of being obese and inactive.

Design:

Cross-sectional telephone surveys (perceived) and street-scale environmental audits (observed) were conducted concurrently in two diverse US cities to assess recreational facility access, land use, transportation infrastructure and aesthetics.

Subjects:

A total of 1032 randomly selected urban residents (20% obese, 32% black, 65% female).

Analysis:

Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the association (adjusted prevalence odds ratio (aOR)) between the primary outcome (obese vs normal weight) and perceived and observed environmental indicators, controlling for demographic variables.

Results:

Being obese was significantly associated with perceived indicators of no nearby nonresidential destinations (aOR=2.2), absence of sidewalks (aOR=2.2), unpleasant community (aOR=3.1) and lack of interesting sites (aOR=4.8) and observed indicators of poor sidewalk quality (aOR=2.1), physical disorder (aOR=4.0) and presence of garbage (aOR=3.7). Perceived and observed indicators of land use and aesthetics were the most robust neighborhood correlates of obesity in multivariate analyses.

Conclusions:

The findings contribute substantially to the growing evidence base of community-level correlates of obesity and suggest salient environmental and policy intervention strategies that may reduce population-level obesity prevalence. Continued use of both measurement methods is recommended to clarify inconsistent associations across perceived and observed indicators within the same domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. The surgeon general's call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General: Rockville, MD, 2001.

  2. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic Report of a WHO consultation World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000; 894: 1–253.

  3. National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. The evidence report: National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute. NIH Publication No. 98-4083; 1998.

  4. Hill JO, Peters JC . Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science 1998; 280: 1371–1374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Poston WS, Foreyt JP . Obesity is an environmental issue. Atherosclerosis 1999; 146: 201–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Egger G, Swinburn B . An ‘ecological’ approach to the obesity pandemic. BMJ 1997; 315: 477–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F . Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 1999; 29: 563–570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Franklin BA . The downside of our technological revolution? an obesity-conducive environment. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 1093–1095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E . Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22: 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD . Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med 2003; 25: 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ . Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 1995–2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC . Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28: 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellaway A, Anderson A, Macintyre S . Does area of residence affect body size and shape? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 304–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Lenthe FJ, Mackenbach JP . Neighbourhood deprivation and overweight: the GLOBE study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 234–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sundquist J, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE . Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 841–845.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R, Zlot A, Raudenbush S . Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. Am J Health Promot 2003; 18: 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank LD, Andresen MA, Schmid TL . Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27: 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D . Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 1552–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Catlin TK, Simoes EJ, Brownson RC . Environmental and policy factors associated with overweight among adults in Missouri. Am J Health Promot 2003; 17: 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boehmer TK, Lovegreen SL, Haire-Joshu D, Brownson RC . What constitutes an obesogenic environment in rural communities? Am J Health Promot 2006; 20: 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giles-Corti B, Macintyre S, Clarkson JP, Pikora T, Donovan RJ . Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with overweight and obesity in Perth, Australia. Am J Health Promot 2003; 18: 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boehmer TK, Hoehner CM, Wyrwich KW, Brennan Ramirez LK, Brownson RC . Correspondence between perceived and observed measures of neighborhood environmental supports for physical activity. J Physical Activity Health 2006; 3: 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blair SN, Brodney S . Effects of physical inactivity and obesity on morbidity and mortality: current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: S646–S662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee CD, Blair SN, Jackson AS . Cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69: 373–380.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stevens J, Cai J, Evenson KR, Thomas R . Fitness and fatness as predictors of mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease in men and women in the Lipid Research Clinics Study. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156: 832–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Farrell SW, Braun L, Barlow CE, Cheng YJ, Blair SN . The relation of body mass index, cardiorespiratory fitness, and all-cause mortality in women. Obes Res 2002; 10: 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirtland K, Porter D, Addy C, Neet MJ, Williams JE, Sharpe PA et al. Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24: 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brownson RC, Eyler AA, King AC, Shyu Y-L, Brown DR, Homan SM . Reliability of information on physical activity and other chronic disease risk factors among US women aged 40 years or older. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 379–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brennan LK, Baker EA, Haire-Joshu D, Brownson RC . Linking perceptions of the community to behavior: are protective social factors associated with physical activity? Health Educ Behav 2003; 30: 740–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brownson RC, Chang JJ, Eyler AA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Saelens BE et al. Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of three questionnaires. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1381–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Brennan LK, Cook RA, Elliott MB, McMullen KM . Reliability of two instruments for auditing the environment for physical activity. J Physical Activity Health 2004; 1: 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273: 402–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH . Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA 2005; 293: 1861–1867.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wellens RI, Roche AF, Khamis HJ, Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Siervogel RM . Relationships between the Body Mass Index and body composition. Obes Res 1996; 4: 35–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ . Ecometrics: toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociol Methodol 1999; 29: 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mantel N . Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: extensions of the Mantel–Haenszel procedure. J Am Stat Assoc 1963; 58: 690–700.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ewing R, Handy S, Brownson RC, Clemente O, Winston E . Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. J Physical Activity Health 2006; 3: S223–S240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K . An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988; 15: 351–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Killingsworth RE . Health promoting community design: a new paradigm to promote healthy and active communities. Am J Health Promot 2003; 17: 169–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S . Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med 2002; 55: 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the assistance of Rebeka Cook, Montenia Anderson, Cheryl Kelly, Kathy McMullen, Omar Brown, Dwayne Ellis, Glen Grant, Timothy Hill and Albert Spears in data collection, and of Michael Elliott in data management. We also thank C Tracy Orleans and Marla Hollander of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for their support throughout this project. This study was funded through The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation contract no. 051603, including support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract U48/DP000060-01 (Prevention Research Centers Program).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T K Boehmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boehmer, T., Hoehner, C., Deshpande, A. et al. Perceived and observed neighborhood indicators of obesity among urban adults. Int J Obes 31, 968–977 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803531

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803531

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links