Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research
  • Published:

Factors influencing sexual function in patients with rectal cancer

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 17, pages 231–238 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

Only few studies have investigated the impact of surgery for rectal cancer on sexual function. Little of that research included quality of life (QoL) aspects and hardly any study analyzed the impact of age, gender and type of surgery on sexual function. The aim of the presented study was to address these issues. Over a 5 y period, EORTC-QLQ-C-30 and a tumor-specific module were prospectively administered to patients before surgery, at discharge, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Comparisons were made between patients receiving abdominoperineal resection (APR), anterior resection (AR) with or without Pouch and Sigmoid resection. Furthermore, effects of surgery on female and male patients, and age groups were analyzed. A total of 819 patients participated in the study: 412 were males and 407 were females. The groups were comparable in terms of adjuvant treatment, tumor stage and histology. Patients after APR and AR with Pouch had worst sexual function. Men reported significantly more difficulties with sexual enjoyment; furthermore, over time, sexual problems created high levels of strain in men that were worse than baseline levels in the early postoperative period. These problems tended to remain. Patients aged 69 y and younger scored higher for problems with loss of sexual function and sexuality-related strain than patients aged 70 y and older. The findings in this study confirm that QoL changes postsurgery and that factors like type of surgery, gender and age have tremendous impact on sexual function and sexual enjoyment. APR and AR with Pouch affect sexual function more than AR and resection of the lower sigmoid. Through impaired sexual enjoyment, men are put more under strain than women. Patients aged 69 y and younger experience more stress through deteriorated sexual function.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Becker N, Muscat JE, Wynder EL . Cancer morbidity in the United States and Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2001; 127: 293–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Enker WE . Potency, cure, and local control in the operative treatment of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 1396–1402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heald RJ, Ryall RDH . Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 28: 1479–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chorost MI et al. Sexual dysfunction, informed consent and multimodality therapy for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 271–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatwin NA, Ribordy M, Givel JC . Clinical outcomes and quality of life after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg 2002; 168: 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engel J et al. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 203–213.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. QLQ C-30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sprangers MA et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 291–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson-Homewood J et al. Development of a disease specific questionnaire to supplement a generic tool for QoL in colorectal cancer. Psychooncology 2003; 12: 675–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Sullivan M . EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group: Brussels, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pocard M et al. A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 2002; 131: 368–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Aaronson NK . The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 238–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Engel J et al. Comparison of breast and rectal cancer patients' quality of life: results of a four year prospective field study. Eur J Cancer Care 2003; 2: 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJC . Prospective analysis of quality of life and survival following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1617–1622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Danzi M, Ferulano GP, Abate S, Califano G . Male sexual function after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1983; 26: 665–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wood-Dauphinee S . Assessing quality of life in clinical research: from where have we come and where are we going? J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 355–363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Balslev I, Harling H . Sexual dysfunction following operation for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1983; 26: 785–788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maurer CA et al. Total mesorectal excision preserves male genital function compared with conventional rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1501–1505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maas CP et al. A prospective study on radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000; 26: 751–757.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Holm T, Singnomklao T, Rutquist L-E, Cedermark B . Adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal carcinoma. Adverse effects during long term follow up of two randomized trials. Cancer 1996; 78: 968–976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F . Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1551–1556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mannaerts GH et al. Urologic and sexual morbidity following multimodality treatment for locally advanced primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001; 27: 265–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hjortrup A et al. Sexual dysfunction after low anterior resection for midrectal cancer. Acta Chir Scand 1984; 150: 687–688.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maisey NR et al. Baseline quality of life predicts survival with advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 1351–1357.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ . Male gender adversely affects survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 711–715.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. EORTC study group on quality of Life. EORTC Quality of Life questionnaires. Available at http://www.eortc.be/home/qol/modules.htm. Accessed January 26, 2004.

  27. Wiltink J et al. Validation of the German version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in patients with erectile dysfunction, Peyronie's disease and controls. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: 192–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gacci M et al. Urinary symptoms, quality of life and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy before and after prostatectomy: a prospective study. Br J Urol 2003; 91: 196–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Derby CA et al. Measurement of erectile dysfunction in population-based studies: the use of a single question self-assessment in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Impot Res 2000; 12: 197–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim NK et al. Assessment of sexual and voiding function after total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in males with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1178–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nesbakken A et al. Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 206–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Küchler Th et al. Impact of psychotherapeutic support on gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: ‘survival results of a trial’. Hepatopgastronenterology 1999; 46: 322–325.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    C E Schmidt & B Kremer

  2. Reference Center Quality of Life in Oncology, University Clinic of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    B Bestmann & T Küchler

Authors
  1. C E Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B Bestmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T Küchler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B Kremer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C E Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, C., Bestmann, B., Küchler, T. et al. Factors influencing sexual function in patients with rectal cancer. Int J Impot Res 17, 231–238 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901276

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901276

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links