Key Points
-
Dental unit water supplies become heavily contaminated with micro-organisms.
-
The number can exceed the European standards for potable water.
-
Super-oxidised water was used in a concentrated form to purge biofilm from dental units.
-
Super-oxidised water was then used in a 5% (v/v) concentration as a maintenance dose to prevent recolonisation of the units.
-
The combination of a purge and a maintenance dose of super-oxidised water reduced the micro-organisms to zero.
Abstract
Aims To determine the efficacy of super-oxidised water (Optident/Sterilox) in the decontamination of dental unit water lines.
Methods Dental units (10) were first purged with concentrated super-oxidised water. After purging, a 5% (v/v) super-oxidised water was used as a maintenance dose. Samples for microbiology were taken after 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 d, and each week for a further 13 weeks.
Results After purging, 5% (v/v) super-oxidised water was successful in reducing the microbial counts to zero, although in three of the units some bacteria were intermittently isolated in the first week of treatment.
Conclusions Super-oxidised water was successful in the removal of bacteria from dental unit water supplies. Complete removal required the treatment with a purge phase of concentrated disinfectant and a maintenance phase of at least two weeks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Dental unit water lines become contaminated both from the inlet water supplies and by back-siphonage through the turbines and three-in-one syringe.1,2 The micro-organisms which contaminate the water lines are mainly bacteria, which form tenacious biofilms on the walls of the tubing in the unit.3,4 The biofilms release bacteria into the unit water, which can contaminate patients.5 The bacteria present in the contaminated water lines can cause opportunistic infections and include Pseudomonads, Legionella and Mycobacteria spp.6 The bacterial counts can be as high 1.6 × 105 cfu ml−1.7 These high counts are in excess of the European Union guidelines, which specify that drinking water should be supplied at <100 cfu ml−1 at 22°C and <20 cfu ml−1 at 37°C.8
This investigation describes the use of super-oxidised water for the disinfection of dental unit water supplies. Super-oxidised water is a solution of sodium chloride, which has been electrolysed by passage over titanium electrodes at 9 amp. The product that is produced has a pH of 5.0–6.5, an oxidation potential of >950 mv and is mainly hypochlorous acid at a concentration of approximately 144 mg Lml−1.9 Super-oxidised water has high cidal activity against a range of bacteria including Legionella and Mycobacteria spp.10 It has already been tested in a laboratory model of dental unit water systems and found to be effective.11
Method
Disinfectant
The unit for the generation of the super-oxidised water (Optident/Sterilox) was supplied by Optident (Ilkley, Yorkshire). The unit consisted of a generator attached to a saline solution reservoir. On demand, the saline solution was passed through the generator producing concentrated super-oxidised water.
Units and disinfection protocol
Ten Adec Cascade units were used in the trial with independent reservoirs (Adec, Nuneaton, UK). The units had not been used for operative work in the three weeks preceding the trial. The units were used for clinical work after disinfection when the recoverable colony counts fell below 100 cfu ml−1. The unit reservoirs were filled with concentrated super-oxidised water and approximately 100 ml was evacuated from each outlet to ensure that the tubing was filled with disinfectant. The concentrated super-oxidised water was left in place for 4 h to purge the system of biofilms. After 4 h the reservoir was disconnected, emptied and refilled with a 5% (v/v) solution of super-oxidised water, approximately 100 ml was then evacuated from each outlet. Fresh 5% (v/v) super-oxidised water was then used each working day (Monday to Friday) during the trial. At the weekends 5% (v/v) diluted super-oxidised water was left in the unit.
Microbiology
The turbine, slow-speed, three-in-one syringe and cup-filler outlets were sampled after 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 days and then weekly for a further 13 weeks. The water samples were collected aseptically in a sterile bottle containing 0.1 g of sodium thiosulphate to neutralise any residual disinfectant. The methods used for microbiological analysis were those used by Walker et al.6,11 Briefly this consisted of first filtering the water through an 0.2 μM filter (Techware, Poole, UK) to recover viable micro-organisms. The filters were then vortexed in 10 ml phosphate buffered saline for 10 min to recover the waterborne micro-organisms. The recovered counts of micro-organisms were done by making decimal dilutions of the water samples with sterile phosphate buffered saline, plating onto R2A agar and incubating for 7 d at 37°C.6,11 The number of colony forming units of micro-organisms ml−1 (CFU ml−1) was calculated from these dilutions. A number of selective media were also used for the detection of oral streptococci, Actinomyces spp, oral anaerobes, Enterobacteria, Pseudomonads, Candida, Legionella and Mycobacterium spp; these were as described by Walker et al.6,11 Identification to species level was done by growth on selective agar and then the methods of Walker et al.6,11
Results
Table 1 shows the number of colony forming units recovered from the first two weeks of the trial; after this period no further bacteria were recovered. The CFU from the turbine outlets are shown for convenience, as these were consistently the highest found. Initially, the predominant bacteria were diphtheroids (which were not identified) and Pseudomonads, with no other micro-organisms grown on the selective media. After 7 d no further bacteria were recovered from the units. Clinical work was recommenced on the units 11 days after the start of the trial. One unit had counts of 20 CFU ml−1 after 3 d and two had counts of 35 and 50 CFU ml−1 after 7 d; these counts contained no significant pathogens.
Discussion
The methodology used in this study is that described by Walker and colleagues.6,11,12 Both selective and non-selective culture media were used to ensure that known pathogens and vegetative bacteria would be recovered. The bacterial counts at 37°C were used as a measure of the total micro-organisms present. A 14 week trial was chosen to assess any effects of the disinfectant on the units.
The units were initially heavily colonised with bacteria and presumably biofilm was present which kept the counts high. The high counts obtained from these units were the reason for their withdrawal from clinical use. After treatment with super-oxidised water the number of bacteria fell to zero until the end of the 14-week trial period. Three units did however have counts ranging from 24 – 36 CFU ml−1 in the first week of the trial. The reason for this is not known, but one explanation could be the release of bacteria from residual biofilm.
The super-oxidised water reduced the bacterial counts in the effluent water to zero after one week, which compares well to other disinfectant systems used for this purpose.13 No deleterious effects were found from the use of the disinfectant on the units during the 14-week period. After this trial the units in Liverpool Dental Hospital have had six months of exposure to the super oxidised water, no effects have been found on the tubing, or the units themselves. Clearly, only further long-term use of super oxidised water will establish its effect on dental units. It is unlikely that super oxidised water will have any harmful effects on operators by inhalation or prolonged contact. Extensive studies by Sterilox (Sterilox Technologies International Ltd, Abingdon, UK) using standard international tests of exposure and toxicology have failed to show any harmful effects (Sterilox, data on file). This disinfectant is now used to treat endoscopes in a large number of primary care trusts in the UK and hospitals in the USA. Super oxidised water has also been shown to be an effective cleaning agent in root canal therapy.14
This form of disinfectant and other systems can reduce the bacterial counts to well within the parameters for potable water by the European Union.8 At least two effective disinfection systems are now available for the disinfection of dental unit water systems,13 the continued use of untreated dental unit water containing bacterial counts greater than that recommended by the EU8 is difficult to justify on professional, moral or ethical grounds.
References
Blake GC. Incidence and control of bacteria in dental spray reservoirs. Br Dent J 1963; 115: 413– 416.
Smith AJ, Hood J, Bagg J, Burke FJT. Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 12– 14.
Williams HN, Baer ML. Ketley JI. Contribution of biofilm bacteria to the contamination of the dental unit water supply. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1255– 1260.
Barbeau J, Gauthier C, Payment P. Biofilms, infectious agents, and dental unit water supplies. Can J Microbiol 1998;44: 1019– 1028.
Martin MV. The significance of the bacterial contamination of dental unit water systems. Br Dent J 1987: 163: 152– 154.
Walker JT, Bradshaw DJ, Bennett A, Fulford MR, Martin MV, Marsh PD. Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental unit water systems in general dental practice. J Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66: 3363– 3367.
Karpay RL, Plamondou TJ, Mills SE. Comparison of methods used to enumerate bacteria in dental unit water lines. Curr Microbiol 1999; 38: 132– 134.
Anonymous. Council directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official J Eur Commun 1998: L330: 32– 54.
Selkon JB, Babb JR, Morris R. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a new super-oxidised water, Sterilox, for the disinfection of endoscopes. J Hosp Infect 1999; 41: 59– 70.
Shetty NS, Srinivasan J, Holton, Ridgway GL. Evaluation of the microbiocidal activity of a new disinfectant Sterilox 2500 against Clostridium difficile spores, Helicobacter pylori, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species, Candida albicans and several Mycobacterium species. J Hosp Infect 1999; 41: 101– 105.
Walker JT, Bradshaw DJ, Fulford MR, Marsh PD. Microbiological evaluation of a range of disinfectant products to control mixed-species biofilm contamination in a laboratory model of dental unit water system. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69: 3327– 3332.
Reasoner DJ, Goldreich EE. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 49: 1– 7.
Smith AJ, McHough S, Aitken L, Hood J. Evaluation of the efficacy of Alpron disinfectant in dental unit water supplies. Br Dent J 2002: 193: 593– 596.
Solovyeva AM, Dummer PMH. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study. Int Endo J 2000; 33: 494– 504.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr D. Oultram and Mr T. Butterfield of Optident, UK for supplying the Optident/Sterilox generator and fluids for this trial.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, M., Gallagher, M. An investigation of the efficacy of super–oxidised (Optident/Sterilox) water for the disinfection of dental unit water lines. Br Dent J 198, 353–354 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812174
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812174
This article is cited by
-
Electrolyzed water for the microbiologic control in the pandemic dental setting: a systematic review
BMC Oral Health (2022)
-
Bactericidal and Fungicidal Activity in the Gas Phase of Sodium Dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC)
Current Microbiology (2016)
-
Some factors influencing the stability of Sterilox®, a super-oxidised water
British Dental Journal (2011)
-
An audit improves the quality of water within the dental unit water lines of general dental practices across the East of England
British Dental Journal (2010)
-
A direct comparison between extracted tooth and filter-membrane biofilm models of endodontic irrigation using Enterococcus faecalis
Archives of Microbiology (2010)