Abstract
Those who experience spinal trauma above the level of C4 require continued ventilation to keep them alive. Over the past 15 years considerable expertise has been developed in not only successfully treating these patients, but also returning them to their home environment with full ventilator support.
Little objective evidence is available concerning the views of those who receive permanent ventilation and whether they or their relatives consider it would have been better to allow them to die. The present investigation examined the perceived value of returning home whilst still requiring ventilation, from the point of view of both the injured persons themselves and their nearest relatives.
Objective analyses were made using the Family Environment Scale (Moos 1986)1 and a measure of affective state2 of the interaction patterns within each of the families. Although there was some alteration in affective state experienced in most families, the most important factors associated with adaptation appear to be the level of communication within the family and the degree of commitment between all family members.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Moos R, Moos B S (1986) Family Environment Scale. Consulting Psychologists Press, 577 College Ave, Palo Alto, Ca94306.
Snaith R P, Constantopoulos A A, Jardine M Y, McGuffin P (1978) A clinical scale for the self-assessment of irritability. Br J Psychiatry 132: 164–178.
Glen W L, Phelps M L (1985) Diaphragm pacing by electrode stimulation of the phrenic nerve. Neurosurgery 17: 974–980.
Gardner B P, Theocleous F, Watt J W H, Krishnan K R (1985) Ventilation or dignified death for patients with high tetraplegia. Br Med J 291: 1620–1622.
Christopherson J (1968) Role modifications of the disabled male. Am J Nurs 68: 290–293.
Brag G P (1977) Reactive patterns in families of the severely disabled. Rehabil Courts Bull 20: 236–239.
Buckelew S P, Frank R G, Elliott T R, Chaney J, Hewitt J (1991) Adjustment to spinal cord injury: Stage theory revisited. Paraplegia 29: 125–130.
Hoad A D, Oliver M J, Silver J R (1990) The Experience of Spinal Cord Injury for Other Family Members. Thames Polytechnic Publications, London.
Glass C A, Krishnan K R, Bingley J D (1991) Spinal injury rehabilitation: Do staff and patients agree on what they are talking about? Paraplegia 29: 343–349.
Whiteneck G G, Carter R E, Charlifue S W, Hall K M, Menter R R, Wilkerson M A et al (1985) A Collaborative Study in Quadriplegia. Rocky Mountain Regional SI System, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Co.
Purtillo R B (1986) Ethical issues in treatment of chronic ventilator dependent patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67: 718–721.
Maynard F M, Muth A S (1987) The choice to end life as a ventilator dependent quadriplegic. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68: 682–684.
Levy N B (1974) Living or Dying: Adaptation to Haemodialysis. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill.
Glass C A, Fielding D M, Evans C M, Ashcroft J B (1987) Factors related to sexual functioning in male patients undergoing haemodialysis and after kidney transplants. Arch Sex Behav 16(3): 189–207.
Estes W K, Skinner B F (1941) Some qualitative properties of anxiety. J Exper Psychol 3: 371–387.
Ferster C B (1965) A functional analysis of depression. Am Psychologist 28: 857–870.
Hohman G W (1966) Some effects of spinal cord lesions on experienced emotional feelings. Psychophysiology 3(2): 143–156.
Fraser M H, Holmes T (1990) The Southport professional rehabilitation programme. 2nd International Meeting of Robotics and Handicap. Revue Européenne de Technologie Biomedicale 12(5): 301–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Paper read at the first European Conference on Domiciliary Ventilation and High Spinal Cord Lesion in Southport, England, in October 1991.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glass, C. The impact of home based ventilator dependence on family life. Spinal Cord 31, 93–101 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.16
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.16