For many reasons, tests of the environment, and particularly of gene-by-environment (G×E) interactions, have been left out of genome-wide association (GWA) estimates of genetic main effects. A tutorial on the current study designs for mapping G×E interactions is provided by Duncan Thomas (Gene–environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 11, 259–272 (2010))1. Some2 have argued that G×E interactions will contribute little to the missing heritability3 if G×E effects are small or if correlations between gene and environment (rGE) mask genotype-by-genotype (G×G) effects. However, G×E effects may be underestimated in behavioural genetic approaches when it is assumed that environments differ when they are in fact similar. The theoretical challenge is that, in most studies, the environment is self-selected, and so environment effects cannot be distinguished from unmeasured genetic effects. Furthermore, if the environment is poorly assessed, the G×E equation contains two components with highly divergent error variations, creating high risks for type 1 and type 2 errors4. Replication of G×E findings is therefore crucially dependent on accurate assessments of the environment5,6 and on the absence of rGE.
A promising avenue for circumventing the issues that are inherent in correlational G×E studies is the genetically informed experimental intervention7. In randomized control trials (RCTs), the environment is manipulated in standard ways, and the randomization breaks the potential rGE. Evidence in support of this approach comes from three pioneering G×E RCTs, all showing that intervention efficacy is genetically moderated by the 7-repeat allele of the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene, which contains 7 copies of a 48 bp tandem repeat. In one randomized experiment, toddlers who carried this allele showed a greater reduction in disruptive behaviour after parenting skill intervention than children who did not carry this allele7. In another experiment, preschoolers with the same genotype were more positively affected by being randomly assigned to exposure to computer games that targeted their emerging phoneme awareness skills than those children not carrying this allele were8. In a third trial, this one focused on African–American adolescents and their families, teenagers carrying the 7-repeat version of DRD4 were more positively affected than others by an intervention targeting substance use9.
These genetically moderated intervention effects are based on rather small samples (157–337 individuals) and need replication. However, they agree with meta-analytic evidence10 and provide experimental support for the potential importance of G×E11, suggesting that experimental methods are powerful strategies for examining candidate G×E effects. The observed effects are also consistent with the differential susceptibility claim that individuals differ in the extent to which they are affected — either positively or negatively — by environmental exposures12,13. One exciting implication of this perspective is that there should be genetically based heterogeneity in intervention efficacy and, as a corollary, that studies incorrectly estimate intervention efficacy systematically, overestimating it for some (less susceptible) individuals and underestimating it for other (more susceptible) individuals.
GWA studies (GWASs) have documented disappointingly small genetic associations with common human diseases, cognitive abilities and behavioural traits. For example, the first GWASs of reading ability14 and IQ15 explained less than 1% of the variance, whereas behavioural genetic (twin) studies have revealed much stronger genetic effects, explaining 50% or more of the variation between individuals2. We propose here that one way to bridge this gap — that is, to account for the missing heritability3 — is through G×E experiments.
References
Thomas, D. Gene–environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 259–272 (2010).
Plomin, R. Child development and molecular genetics: 13 years later. Child Dev. (in the press).
Maher, B. Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature 456, 18–21 (2008).
Wachs, T. D. & Plomin, R. Conceptualization and Measurement of Organism–Environment Interaction. (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1991).
Caspi A. et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 301, 386–389 (2003).
McGuffin, P., Alsabban, S. & Uher, R. The truth about genetic variation in the serotonin transporter gene and response to stress and medication. Br. J. Psychiatry 198, 424–427 (2011).
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Pijlman, F. T. A., Mesman, J. & Juffer, F. Experimental evidence for differential susceptibility: dopamine D4 receptor polymorphism (DRD4 VNTR) moderates intervention effects on toddlers' externalizing behaviour in a randomized trial. Dev. Psychol. 44, 293–300 (2008).
Kegel, C. A. T., Bus, A. G. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. Differential susceptibility in early literacy instruction through computer games: the role of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4). Mind Brain Educ. 5, 71–78 (2011).
Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G. H., Lei, M. K. & Philibert, R. A. Differential susceptibility to parenting among African American youths: testing the DRD4 hypothesis. J. Fam. Psychol. 24, 513–521 (2010).
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: new evidence and a meta-analysis. Dev. Psychopathol. 23, 39–52 (2011).
Rutter, M. Genes and Behaviour: Nature–Nurture Interplay Explained. (2006, Oxford, Blackwell).
Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. For better and for worse: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 300–304 (2007).
Belsky, J et al. Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? Mol. Psychiatry 14, 746–754 (2009).
Meaburn, E. L., Harlaar, N., Craig, I. W., Schalkwyk, L. C. & Plomin, R. Quantitative trait locus association scan of early reading disability and ability using pooled DNA and 100K SNP microarrays in a sample of 5,760 children. Mol. Psychiatry 13, 729–740 (2008).
Davis, O. S. P. et al. A three-stage genome-wide association study of general cognitive ability: hunting the small effects. Behav. Genet. 40, 759–767 (2010).
Acknowledgements
The authors were supported by the Jacobs Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van IJzendoorn, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., Belsky, J. et al. Gene-by-environment experiments: a new approach to finding the missing heritability. Nat Rev Genet 12, 881 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2764-c1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2764-c1
This article is cited by
-
Identification of intergenerational epigenetic inheritance by whole genome DNA methylation analysis in trios
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
CHIMGEN: a Chinese imaging genetics cohort to enhance cross-ethnic and cross-geographic brain research
Molecular Psychiatry (2020)
-
Differential sensitivity to the environment: contribution of cognitive biases and genes to psychological wellbeing
Molecular Psychiatry (2016)
-
Application of environmental sensitivity theories in personalized prevention for youth substance abuse: a transdisciplinary translational perspective
Translational Behavioral Medicine (2016)
-
The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2015)