Abstract
According to some models of visual selective attention, objects in a scene activate corresponding neural representations, which compete for perceptual awareness and motor behavior. During a visual search for a target object, top-down control exerted by working memory representations of the target's defining properties resolves competition in favor of the target. These models, however, ignore the existence of associative links among object representations. Here we show that such associations can strongly influence deployment of attention in humans. In the context of visual search, objects associated with the target were both recalled more often and recognized more accurately than unrelated distractors. Notably, both target and associated objects competitively weakened recognition of unrelated distractors and slowed responses to a luminance probe. Moreover, in a speeded search protocol, associated objects rendered search both slower and less accurate. Finally, the first saccades after onset of the stimulus array were more often directed toward associated than control items.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Posner, M.I. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32, 3–25 (1980).
Bundesen, C. A theory of visual attention. Psychol. Rev. 97, 523–547 (1990).
Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognit. Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980).
Posner, M.I. & Deheane, S. Attentional networks. Trends Neurosci. 7, 75–79 (1994).
Van der Heiden, A.H.C. Selective Attention in Vision (Routledge, London, 1992).
LaBerge, D. Attentional Processing (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995).
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).
Chelazzi, L., Miller, E.K., Duncan, J. & Desimone, R. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363, 345–347 (1993).
Luck, S.J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S.A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention in in areas V1, V2 and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 24–42 (1997).
Chelazzi, L., Duncan, J., Miller, E.K. & Desimone, R. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 2918–2940 (1998).
Reynolds, J.H., Chelazzi, L. & Desimone, R. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J. Neurosci. 19, 1736–1753 (1999).
Reynolds, J.H., Pasternak, T. & Desimone, R. Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron 26, 703–714 (2000).
Yantis, S. Control of visual attention. in Attention (ed. Pashler, H.) 223–256 (Univ. College London Press, London, 1998).
Hebb, D.O. The Organization of Behavior (Wiley, New York, 1949).
Deese, J. The Structure of Associations in Language and Thought (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1965).
Anderson, J.R. & Bower, G.H. Human Associative Memory (V.H. Winston, Washington, DC, 1973).
Collins, A.M. & Loftus, E.F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol. Rev. 82, 407–428 (1975).
McClelland, J.L. Connectionists models of memory. in The Oxford Handbook of Memory (eds. Tulving, E. & Craik, F.I.M.) 583–596 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 2000).
Estes, W.K. Classification and Cognition (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1994).
Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol. Rev. 96, 433–458 (1989).
Downing, P.E. Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychol. Sci. 11, 467–473 (2000).
Awh, E., Jonides, J. & Reuter-Lorenz, P. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 780–790 (1998).
Ishai, A. & Sagi, D. Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. Science 268, 1712–1774 (1995).
Wolfe, J.M. Inattentional amnesia. in Fleeting Memories (ed. Coltheart, V.) (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999).
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs 74, 1–29 (1960).
Tulving, E. & Schacter, D.L. Priming and human memory systems. Science 247, 301–306 (1990).
Findlay, J.M. Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Res. 37, 617–631 (1997).
Thorpe, S., Fize, D. & Marlot, C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381, 520–522 (1996).
Chun, M.M. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 170–178 (2000).
Chun, M.M. & Jiang, Y. Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychol. Sci. 10, 360–365 (1999).
Henderson, J.M. & Hollingworth, A. High-level scene perception. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 243–271 (1999).
Biederman, I., Glass, A.L. & Stacy, E.W. Searching for objects in real-world scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. 97, 22–27 (1973).
Palmer, S.E. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Mem. Cognit. 3, 519–526 (1975).
Friedman, A. Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 108, 316–355 (1979).
Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R.J. & Rabinowitz, J.C. Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognit. Psychol. 14, 143–177 (1982).
Boyce, S.J., Pollastek, A. & Rayner, K. Effect of background information on object identification. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 556–566 (1989).
Hollingworth, A. & Henderson, J.M. Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 398–415 (1998).
Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, M.J. & Price, C.J. Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 352, 1275–1282 (1997).
Parasuraman, R. & Martin, A. Interaction of semantic and perceptual processes in repetition blindness. Vis. Cognit. 8, 103–118 (2001).
Butter, C.M. & Goodale, M.A. Visual search selectively enhances recognition of the search target. Vis. Cognit. 7, 769–784 (2000).
Peterson, M.A. & Gibson, B.S. Shape recognition inputs to figure-ground organization in three-dimensional displays. Cognit. Psychol. 25, 383–429 (1993).
Peterson, M.A. & Gibson, B.S. Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: operations on outlines and subjective contours. Percept. Psychophys. 56, 551–564 (1994).
Peterson, M.A. & Kim, J.H. On what is bound in figures and grounds. Vis. Cognit. 8, 329–348 (2001).
Glaser, W.R. Picture naming. Cognition 42, 61–105 (1992).
Fodor, J.A. Modularity of Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983).
Roediger, H.L. III & McDermott, K.B. Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 803–814 (1995).
Roediger, H.L. & McDermott, K.B. Implicit memory in normal human subjects. in Handbook of Neuropsychology Vol. 8 (eds. Boller, F. & Grafman, J.) 63–131 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993).
Ochsner, K.N., Chiu, C.Y. & Schacter, D.L. Varieties of priming. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 189–194 (1994).
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this project was provided by grants to L.C. from the Human Frontier Science Program, the McDonnell-Pew Foundation, the Italian Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MURST) and the Italian Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR). E.M. was supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship of the European Community programme “Improving Human Research Potential and the Socio-economic Knowledge Base” under contract number HPMFCT-2000-00562. We thank J. Duncan and M. Peterson for helpful comments on preliminary versions of this paper and M. Veronese for preparing the figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moores, E., Laiti, L. & Chelazzi, L. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nat Neurosci 6, 182–189 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn996
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn996
This article is cited by
-
The impact of semantic matching on the additive effects of object-based attentional selection
Current Psychology (2023)
-
Increased associative interference under high cognitive load
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Does death make us all equal? Materialism and status-seeking under Mortality Salience
International Review of Economics (2019)
-
Interaction between numbers and size during visual search
Psychological Research (2017)
-
Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?
Experimental Brain Research (2015)