Abstract
Previous studies have shown that selection for perceptual report is often limited to one object at a time, with elements being selected together if they belong to part of the same perceptual group. Here we used the neuropsychological phenomenon of extinction in human patients with parietal lesions to show that selection is influenced also by action relations between objects. Performance was better for objects that were positioned spatially so that they could be used together, relative to objects that were positioned inappropriately for their combined use. The action relation was critical, as performance for pictures did not improve if the items were only verbally associated. We found the opposite result with words. Effects of action relations emerged even on trials where only one object could be reported, showing implicit coding of 'action' units for selection. The effects of verbal associations may instead reflect priming between lexical entries.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Oppenheim, H. Ueber eine durch eine klinisch bisher nicht verwerthete Untersuchungsmethode ermittelte Form der Sensibilitatsstoerung bei einseitigen Erkrankugen des Groβbirns. Neurologisches Centralblatt 4, 529–533 (1885).
Critchley, M. The Parietal Lobes (Hafner Press, London, 1953).
Duncan, J. Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. in Attention and Performance XVI (eds. Inui, T. and McClelland, J.L.) 549–578 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996).
Duncan, J., Humphreys, G.W. & Ward, R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 255–261 (1997).
Gilchrist, D., Humphreys, G.W. & Riddoch, M.J. Grouping and extinction: evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 13, 1223–1249 (1996).
Mattingley, J.B., Davis, G. & Driver, J. Pre-attentive filling in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science 275, 671–674 (1997).
Humphreys, G.W. & Riddoch, M.J. Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology. in Attention and Performance XIV (eds. Meyer, D.E. & Kornblum, S.) 143–162 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993).
Humphreys, G.W. The representation of objects in space. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1341–1351 (1998).
Ward, R., Goodrich, S.J. and Driver, J. Grouping reduces visual extinction: neuropsychological evidence for weight linkage in visual selection. Vis. Cognit. 1, 101–129 (1994).
Kumada, T. & Humphreys, G.W. Lexical recovery from extinction: interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 18, 465–478 (2001).
Coslett, H.B. & Saffran, E. Simultanagnosia: to see but not two see. Brain 114, 1523–1545 (1991).
Moss, H. & Older, L. Birkbeck Word-Association Norms (Hove: Psychology Press, East Essex, UK, 1996).
Seron, X., Coyette, F. & Bruyer, R. Ipsilateral influences on contralateral processing in neglect patients. Cognit. Neurosci. 6, 475–498 (1989).
Driver, J. What can visual neglect and extinction reveal about the extent of 'preattentive' processing? in Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (eds. Kramer, A.F., Coles, M.G.H. & Logan, G.D.) 193–224 (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1996).
Allport, D.A. Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. in Current Perspectives in Dysphasia (eds. Newman, S. & Epstein, R.) 32–60 (Churchill Livingstone, London, 1985).
Humphreys, G.W. & Forde, E.M.E. Hierarchies, similarity and interactivity in object recognition: 'category–specific' neuropsychological deficits. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 453–509 (2001).
Shalev, L. & Humphreys, G.W. Biased attentional shifts associated with unilateral left neglect. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 17, 339–364 (2000).
Wilson, B.A., Cockburn, J. & Halligan, P. Behavioural Inattention Test (Thames Valley Test Company, Titchfield, 1987).
Gado, M., Hanaway, J. & Frank, R. Functional anatomy of the cerebral cortex by computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 3, 1–19 (1979).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council (UK) and the Stroke Association to the first and second authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riddoch, M., Humphreys, G., Edwards, S. et al. Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat Neurosci 6, 82–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn984
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn984
This article is cited by
-
Predictive processing of scenes and objects
Nature Reviews Psychology (2023)
-
The visual encoding of graspable unfamiliar objects
Psychological Research (2023)
-
Attention is required for the perceptual integration of action object pairs
Experimental Brain Research (2016)
-
What Unilateral Visual Neglect Teaches us About Perceptual Phenomenology
Erkenntnis (2015)
-
Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?
Experimental Brain Research (2015)