Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that selection for perceptual report is often limited to one object at a time, with elements being selected together if they belong to part of the same perceptual group. Here we used the neuropsychological phenomenon of extinction in human patients with parietal lesions to show that selection is influenced also by action relations between objects. Performance was better for objects that were positioned spatially so that they could be used together, relative to objects that were positioned inappropriately for their combined use. The action relation was critical, as performance for pictures did not improve if the items were only verbally associated. We found the opposite result with words. Effects of action relations emerged even on trials where only one object could be reported, showing implicit coding of 'action' units for selection. The effects of verbal associations may instead reflect priming between lexical entries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Example stimuli for experiments 1 and 2.
Figure 2: Lesion reconstructions in the patients from MRI scans.
Figure 3: Experiment 1.
Figure 4: Experiment 2.
Figure 5: Percentage of correct responses to contralesional targets on error trials in the two-item conditions of experiments 2 and 3, as a function of experimental condition.
Figure 6: Experiment 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oppenheim, H. Ueber eine durch eine klinisch bisher nicht verwerthete Untersuchungsmethode ermittelte Form der Sensibilitatsstoerung bei einseitigen Erkrankugen des Groβbirns. Neurologisches Centralblatt 4, 529–533 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Critchley, M. The Parietal Lobes (Hafner Press, London, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan, J. Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. in Attention and Performance XVI (eds. Inui, T. and McClelland, J.L.) 549–578 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan, J., Humphreys, G.W. & Ward, R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 255–261 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilchrist, D., Humphreys, G.W. & Riddoch, M.J. Grouping and extinction: evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 13, 1223–1249 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattingley, J.B., Davis, G. & Driver, J. Pre-attentive filling in of visual surfaces in parietal extinction. Science 275, 671–674 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Humphreys, G.W. & Riddoch, M.J. Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology. in Attention and Performance XIV (eds. Meyer, D.E. & Kornblum, S.) 143–162 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Humphreys, G.W. The representation of objects in space. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1341–1351 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ward, R., Goodrich, S.J. and Driver, J. Grouping reduces visual extinction: neuropsychological evidence for weight linkage in visual selection. Vis. Cognit. 1, 101–129 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumada, T. & Humphreys, G.W. Lexical recovery from extinction: interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 18, 465–478 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coslett, H.B. & Saffran, E. Simultanagnosia: to see but not two see. Brain 114, 1523–1545 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moss, H. & Older, L. Birkbeck Word-Association Norms (Hove: Psychology Press, East Essex, UK, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seron, X., Coyette, F. & Bruyer, R. Ipsilateral influences on contralateral processing in neglect patients. Cognit. Neurosci. 6, 475–498 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Driver, J. What can visual neglect and extinction reveal about the extent of 'preattentive' processing? in Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (eds. Kramer, A.F., Coles, M.G.H. & Logan, G.D.) 193–224 (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1996).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Allport, D.A. Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. in Current Perspectives in Dysphasia (eds. Newman, S. & Epstein, R.) 32–60 (Churchill Livingstone, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Humphreys, G.W. & Forde, E.M.E. Hierarchies, similarity and interactivity in object recognition: 'category–specific' neuropsychological deficits. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 453–509 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shalev, L. & Humphreys, G.W. Biased attentional shifts associated with unilateral left neglect. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 17, 339–364 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, B.A., Cockburn, J. & Halligan, P. Behavioural Inattention Test (Thames Valley Test Company, Titchfield, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gado, M., Hanaway, J. & Frank, R. Functional anatomy of the cerebral cortex by computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 3, 1–19 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council (UK) and the Stroke Association to the first and second authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Jane Riddoch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riddoch, M., Humphreys, G., Edwards, S. et al. Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat Neurosci 6, 82–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn984

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn984

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing