Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Sensitivity and Resistance to Therapy

Characterization of the ubiquitin–proteasome system in bortezomib-adapted cells

Abstract

Resistance towards the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is poorly understood. We adapted the HL-60, ARH-77 and AMO-1 cell lines (myeloid leukemia, plasmocytoid lymphoma, myeloma) to bortezomib exceeding therapeutic plasma levels, and compared characteristics of the ubiquitin–proteasome system, alternative proteases and the unfolded protein response (UPR) between adapted cells and parental lines. Adapted cells showed increased transcription rates, activities and polypeptide levels of the bortezomib-sensitive β5, but also of the β2 proteasome subunit and consistently retained elevated levels of active β1/β5-type proteasome subunits in the presence of therapeutic levels of bortezomib. Bortezomib-adapted HL-60 cells showed increased expression and proteasome association of the 11S proteasome activator, and did not accumulate poly-ubiquitinated protein, activate the UPR or UPR-mediated apoptosis in response to bortezomib. The rate of protein biosynthesis was reduced, and the transcription of chaperone genes downmodulated. We did not observe major changes in the activities of TPPII, cathepsins or deubiquitinating proteases. We conclude that different types of bortezomib-adapted cell lines, including myeloma, show similar patterns of changes in the proteasomal machinery which result in residual proteasome activity in the presence of bortezomib and a quantitative balance between protein biosynthesis and destruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Richardson PG, Mitsiades C, Hideshima T, Anderson KC . Proteasome inhibition in the treatment of cancer. Cell Cycle 2005; 4: 290–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stapnes C, Doskeland AP, Hatfield K, Ersvaer E, Ryningen A, Lorens JB et al. The proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and PR-171 have antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects on primary human acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol 2007; 136: 814–828.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strauss SJ, Higginbottom K, Juliger S, Maharaj L, Allen P, Schenkein D et al. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib acts independently of p53 and induces cell death via apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe in B-cell lymphoma cell lines. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 2783–2790.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Orlowski RZ, Kuhn DJ . Proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapy: lessons from the first decade. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14: 1649–1657.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glickman MH, Ciechanover A . The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev 2002; 82: 373–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinemeyer W, Ramos PC, Dohmen RJ . The ultimate nanoscale mincer: assembly, structure and active sites of the 20S proteasome core. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004; 61: 1562–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bogyo M, McMaster JS, Gaczynska M, Tortorella D, Goldberg AL, Ploegh H . Covalent modification of the active site threonine of proteasomal beta subunits and the Escherichia coli homolog HslV by a new class of inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 6629–6634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ardley HC, Robinson PA . E3 ubiquitin ligases. Essays Biochem 2005; 41: 15–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Amerik AY, Hochstrasser M . Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1695: 189–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ovaa H, Kessler BM, Rolen U, Galardy PJ, Ploegh HL, Masucci MG . Activity-based ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) profiling of virus-infected and malignant human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 2253–2258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meusser B, Hirsch C, Jarosch E, Sommer T . ERAD: the long road to destruction. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7: 766–772.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang K, Kaufman RJ . The unfolded protein response: a stress signaling pathway critical for health and disease. Neurology 2006; 66: S102–S109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hitomi J, Katayama T, Eguchi Y, Kudo T, Taniguchi M, Koyama Y et al. Involvement of caspase-4 in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis and Aβ-induced cell death. J Cell Biol 2004; 165: 347–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Obeng EA, Carlson LM, Gutman DM, Harrington Jr WJ, Lee KP, Boise LH . Proteasome inhibitors induce a terminal unfolded protein response in multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2006; 107: 4907–4916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Glas R, Bogyo M, McMaster JS, Gaczynska M, Ploegh HL . A proteolytic system that compensates for loss of proteasome function. Nature 1998; 392: 618–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Princiotta MF, Schubert U, Chen W, Bennink JR, Myung J, Crews CM et al. Cells adapted to the proteasome inhibitor 4-hydroxy-5-iodo-3-nitrophenylacetyl-Leu-Leu-leucinal-vinyl sulfone require enzymatically active proteasomes for continued survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 513–518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turk V, Turk B, Turk D . Lysosomal cysteine proteases: facts and opportunities. EMBO J 2001; 20: 4629–4633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berkers CR, Verdoes M, Lichtman E, Fiebiger E, Kessler BM, Anderson KC et al. Activity probe for in vivo profiling of the specificity of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Nat Methods 2005; 2: 357–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Verdoes M, Florea BI, Menendez-Benito V, Maynard CJ, Witte MD, van der Linden WA et al. A fluorescent broad-spectrum proteasome inhibitor for labeling proteasomes in vitro and in vivo. Chem Biol 2006; 13: 1217–1226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kraus M, Rückrich T, Reich M, Gogel J, Beck A, Kammer W et al. Activity patterns of proteasome subunits reflect bortezomib sensitivity of hematologic malignancies and are variable in primary human leukemia cells. Leukemia 2007; 21: 84–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oerlemans R, Franke NE, Assaraf YG, Cloos J, van Zantwijk I, Berkers CR et al. Molecular basis of bortezomib resistance: proteasome subunit beta5 (PSMB5) gene mutation and overexpression of PSMB5 protein. Blood 2008; 112: 2489–2499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lü S, Chen Z, Yang J, Chen L, Gong S, Zhou H et al. Overexpression of the PSMB5 gene contributes to bortezomib resistance in T-lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia cells derived from Jurkat line. Exp Hematol 2008; 36: 1278–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lü S, Yang J, Song X, Gong S, Zhou H, Guo L et al. Point mutation of the proteasome beta5 subunit gene is an important mechanism of bortezomib resistance in bortezomib-selected variants of Jurkat T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia line. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 326: 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuchs D, Berges C, Opelz G, Daniel V, Naujokat C . Increased expression and altered subunit composition of proteasomes induced by continuous proteasome inhibition establish apoptosis resistance and hyperproliferation of Burkitt lymphoma cells. J Cell Biochem 2008; 103: 270–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang EW, Kessler BM, Borodovsky A, Cravatt BF, Bogyo M, Ploegh HL et al. Integration of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway with a cytosolic oligopeptidase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 9990–9995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kraus M, Malenke E, Gogel J, Müller H, Rückrich T, Overkleeft H et al. Ritonavir induces ER-stress and sensitizes sarcoma cells towards bortezomib-induced apoptosis. Mol Cancer Ther 2008; 7: 1940–1948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Proteom-Centrum at the Interfaculty Institute for Cell Biology, University of Tübingen (Professor A Nordheim) for use of the fluorescence scanner and Carsten Henneges for help with data analysis. Research was supported by grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB685), the Deutsche Krebshilfe and the Swiss National Science Foundation (to CD) as well as the Clinical Trials Unit at the Cantonal Hospital St Gallen (CTU-KSSG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Driessen.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Leukemia website (http://www.nature.com/leu)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rückrich, T., Kraus, M., Gogel, J. et al. Characterization of the ubiquitin–proteasome system in bortezomib-adapted cells. Leukemia 23, 1098–1105 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.8

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links