Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Adjusting for reverse causality in the relationship between obesity and mortality

Abstract

Reverse causality, in which obesity-induced disease leads to both weight loss and higher mortality, may bias observed associations between body mass index (BMI) and mortality, but the magnitude of that bias is unknown. The authors examined the impact of reverse causality and the exclusion of various diseases on the observed age-specific mortality ratios for BMI by using a state space model and sensitivity analyses. They found that reverse causality may decrease the ratios and induce a J-shaped curve on a graph. The authors further found that the net effect of excluding various diseases becomes a balance of competing forces, some tending to increase observed mortality ratios, where as others, such as selection based on common effects, may decrease them. Instead of studying just the change in observed mortality ratios, which can be misleading, investigators need to consider causal relationships and evaluate the conceptual and theoretical impact of any analytic maneuver. Analyses should be balanced with sensitivity approaches as well as with alternative analytic approaches such as the use of structural models, G-estimation, simulations and ancillary data from animal studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flegal KM, Williamson DF, Pamuk ER, Rosenberg HM . Estimating deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 1486–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegal KM, Williamson DF, Pamuk ER . Letter: Flegal et al. respond. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 932–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robins JM . An analytic method for randomized trials with informative censoring: part 1. Lifetime Data Anal 1995; 1: 241–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaupel JW, Yashin AI . Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am Stat 1985; 39: 176–185.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenland S . Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference. Epidemiology 1996; 7: 498–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flanders WD, Lin L, Pirkle JL, Caudill SP . Assessing the direction of causality in cross-sectional studies. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 926–935.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Engeland A, Bjorge T, Selmer RM, Tverdal A . Height and body mass index in relation to total mortality. Epidemiology 2003; 14: 293–299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernán MA, Hernández-Diaz S, Robins JM . A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004; 15: 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B . Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 550–560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W D Flanders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flanders, W., Augestad, L. Adjusting for reverse causality in the relationship between obesity and mortality. Int J Obes 32 (Suppl 3), S42–S46 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.84

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.84

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links