Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Maternal nutrition, infants and children

Well-being in pregnancy: an examination of the effect of socioeconomic, dietary and lifestyle factors including impact of a low glycaemic index dietary intervention

Abstract

Background/Objective:

Well-being has been linked to the quality of diet and lifestyle in adults; however, there is a paucity of data in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between well-being and socioeconomic status, diet and lifestyle during pregnancy and to consider the effect of intervention with low glycaemic index (GI) diet on well-being.

Subjects/Methods:

This was a cohort analysis of 619 participants of the ROLO study (Randomised cOntrol trial of LOw GI diet versus no dietary intervention to prevent recurrence of fetal macrosomia). The following data were collected: educational attainment, dietary intakes (food frequency questionnaire), physical activity (self-reported) and well-being (WHO-5-Item Wellbeing Index—expressed as a percentage).

Results:

Well-being was positively associated with education and physical activity. Third-level education was associated with a 3.07-point higher well-being percentage score, and each day that an individual achieved >30 min walking per week was associated with a 1.10-point increase in percentage well-being score, Radj2 2.4% (F=7.260, P=0.001). The intervention low GI group had a significantly lower percentage well-being score than the usual diet group (56.3% vs 59.9%, P=0.015). No correlation was noted between well-being and GI status calculated from food diaries (P=0.469). Well-being was not associated with micronutrient intake.

Conclusions:

Well-being in pregnancy was independently and positively associated with education and physical activity and negatively associated with low GI dietary intervention. These findings have significance not only for women at risk of low mood but also for healthcare professionals when counselling women about the importance of healthy lifestyle in pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walsh JM, McGowan CA, Mahony R, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM . Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO Study): randomised control trial. Br Med J 2012; 345: e5605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lancaster CA, Gold KJ, Flynn HA, Yoo H, Marcus SM, Davis MM . Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR . Prevalence of depression in pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 698–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Studd J, Nappi RE . Reproductive depression. Gynaecol Endocrinol 2012; 28: S42–S45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allison KC, Wrotniak BH, Paré E, Sarwer DB . Psychosocial characteristics and gestational weight change among overweight, African American pregnant women. Obstet Gynaecol Int 2012; 2012, doi:10.1155/2012/878607.

  6. Bodnar LM, Wisner KL . Nutrition and depression: implications for improving mental health among childbearing-aged women. Biol Psych 2005; 58: 679–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Poudevigne MS, O'Connor PJ . A review of physical activity patterns in pregnant women and their relationship to psychological health. Sports Med 2006; 36: 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Teychenn M, Ball K, Salmon J . Physical activity and likelihood of depression in adults: a review. Prev Med 2008; 46: 397–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ströhle A . Physical activity, exercise, depression and anxiety disorders. J Neural Transm 2009; 116: 777–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Da Costa D, Rippen N, Dritsa M, Ring A . Self-reported leisure-time, physical activity during pregnancy and relationship to psychological well-being. J Psychomet Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 24: 111–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodwin A, Astbury J, McMeeken J . Body image and psychological well-being in pregnancy. A comparison of exercisers and non-exercisers. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 40: 442–447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Evenson KR, Savitz DA, Huston SL . Leisure-time physical activity among pregnant women in the US. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004; 18: 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Macera CA, Ham SA, Yore MM, Jones DA, Ainsworth BE, Kimsey CD et al. Prevalence of physical activity in the United States: behavioural risk factor survelliance system, 2001. Prev Chronic Dis 2004; 2: 17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh JM, McGowan CA, Byrne J, McAuliffe FM . Prevalence of physical activity among healthy pregnant women in Ireland. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 114: 154–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion. Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Number 267, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002; 77: 79–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Poudevigne MS, O’Connor PJ . Physical activity, mood, and self-esteem during pregnancy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 1374–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams A, Reilly T, Campbell I, Sutherst J . Investigations of changes in responses to exercise and in mood during pregnancy. Ergonomics 1988; 31: 1539–1549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tendais I, Figueiredo B, Mota J, Conde A . Physical activity, health-related quality of life and depression during pregnancy. Cad Saúde Pública 2011; 27: 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke P, Rousham E, Gross H, Halligan A, Bosio P . Activity patterns and time allocation during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of British women. Ann Hum Biol 2005; 32: 247–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hueston WJ, Kasik-Miller S . Changes in functional health status during normal pregnancy. J Fam Practit 1998; 47: 209–212.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leung BMY, Kaplan BJ . Perinatal depression: prevalence, risks, and the nutrition link—a review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: 1566–1575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. StrΦm M, Mortensen EL, Halldorsson TI, Thorsdottir I, Olsen SF . Fish and long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intakes during pregnancy and risk of postpartum depression: a prospective study based on a large national birth cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bodnar LM, Wisner KL, Luther JF, Powers RW, Evans RW, Gallaher MJ et al. An exploratory factor analysis of nutritional biomarkers associated with major depression in pregnancy. Public Health Nutr 2012; 15: 1078–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Institute of Medicine. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Re-Examining the Guidelines. Report of the Committee to Reexamine Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.

  25. Webb JB, Siega-Riz AM, Dole N . Psychosocial determinants of adequacy of gestational weight gain. Obesity 2008; 17: 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Walsh J, Mahony R, Foley M, McAuliffe FM . A randomised control trial of low glycemic index carbohydrate diet versus no dietary intervention in the prevention of recurrence of macrosomia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10: 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morgan K, McGee H, Watson D, Perry I, Barry M, Shelley E et al SLÁN 2007: Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes & Nutrition in Ireland. Main Report. Department of Health and Children: Dublin, Ireland, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Riboli E, Kaaks R . The EPIC project: rationale and study design. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S6–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harrington J . Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire as a tool for assessing nutrient intake. MA Thesis, Health Promotion. National University of Ireland: Galway, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McGowan CA, McAuliffe FM . Maternal dietary patterns and associated nutrient intakes during each trimester of pregnancy. Public Health Nutr 2013; 16: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Coustan DR, Carpenter MW . The diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: S5–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walsh JM, Mahony R, Byrne J, Foley M, McAuliffe FM . The association of maternal and fetal glucose homeostasis with fetal adiposity and birthweight. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 159: 338–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. World Health Organisation (WHO), Regional Office for Europe. Well-being Measures in Primary Health Care. The DepCare Project: Stockholm, Sweden, 2008.

  34. Bech P, Olsen L, Kjoller M, Rasmussen N . Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-five well-being scale. IntJ Methods Psych Res 2003; 12: 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. DiPietro JA, Christensen AL, Costigan KA . The pregnancy experience scale—brief version. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 29: 262–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lowe B, Spitzer R, Grafe K, Kroenke K, Quenter A, Zipfel S . Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians diagnoses. J Affect Disord 2004; 78: 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ryan D, Milis L, Misri N . Depression during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician 2005; 51: 1087–1093.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bunevicius R, Kusminskas L, Bunevicius A, Nadisauskiene RJ, Jureniene K, Pop VJM . Psychosocial risk factors for depression during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 88: 599–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stathopoulou G, Powers MB, Berry AC, Smits JAJ . Exercise interventions for mental health: a quantitative and qualitative review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2006; 13: 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kanning M, Schlicht W . Be active and become happy: an ecological momentary assessment of physical activity and mood. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2010; 32: 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Da Costa D, Ireland K . Perceived benefits and barriers to leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy in previously inactive and active women. Women Health 2013; 53: 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sathyanarayana Rao TS, Asha MR, Ramesh BN, Jagannatha Rao KS . Understanding nutrition, depression and mental illness. Indian J Psychiatry 2008; 50: 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheatham RA, Roberts SB, Das SK, Gilhooly CH, Golden JK, Hyatt R et al. Long-term effects of provided low and high glycaemic load low energy diets on mood and cognition. Physiol Behav 2009; 98: 374–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Benton D, Nabb S . Carbohydrate, memory and mood. Nutr Rev 2003; 61: S61–S67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hickey CA, Cliver SP, Goldenberg RL, McNeal SF, Hoffman FJ . Relationship of psychosocial status to low prenatal weight gain among nonobese black and white women delivering at term. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 177–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Walker LO, Kim M . Psychosocial thriving during late pregnancy: relationship to ethnicity, gestational weight gain, and birth weight. J Obstet Gynaecol Neonatal Nurs 2002; 31: 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Dole N, London E . Pregravid weight is associated with prior dietary restraint and psychosocial factors during pregnancy. Obesity 2009; 17: 550–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hurley KM, Caulfield LE, Sacco LM, Costigan KA, Dipietro JA . Psychosocial influences in dietary patterns during pregnancy. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; 105: 963–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Health Research Board Ireland, the Health Research Centre for diet, nutrition and diabetes Ireland and the National Maternity Hospital Medical Fund. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), project EarlyNutrition under grant agreement no. 289346.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F M McAuliffe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horan, M., McGowan, C., Doyle, O. et al. Well-being in pregnancy: an examination of the effect of socioeconomic, dietary and lifestyle factors including impact of a low glycaemic index dietary intervention. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 19–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.212

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.212

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links