Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search

Abstract

How do we detect a target in a cluttered environment? Here we present neuropsychological evidence that detection can be based on the action afforded by a target. A patient showing symptoms of unilateral neglect following damage to the right fronto-temporal-parietal region was slow and sometimes unable to find targets when they were defined by their name or even by a salient visual property (such as their color). In contrast, he was relatively efficient at finding a target defined by the action it afforded. Two other patients with neglect showed an opposite pattern; they were better at finding a target defined by its name. The data suggest that affordances can be effective even when a brain lesion limits the use of other properties in search tasks. The findings give evidence for a direct pragmatic route from vision to action in the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Lesion reconstructions in the patients, from MRI scan.
Figure 2: MP's performance across experiments 1–4.
Figure 3: RTs for MP in experiment 5.
Figure 4: Example object and non-object stimuli used in experiment 6.
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J. & Desimone, R. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363, 345–347 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psych. Rev. 96, 433–458 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolfe, J. M. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psych. Bull. Rev. 1, 202–238 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Humphreys, G. W. & Muller, H. M. SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognit. Psych. 25, 43–110 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Humphreys, G. W. & Heinke, D. Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints. Vis. Cognit. 5, 9–48 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gado, M., Hanaway, J. & Frank, R. Functional anatomy of the cerebral cortex by computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 3, 1–19 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson, I. H. & Manley, T. in Attention, Space and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience (eds. Humphreys, G. W., Duncan, J. & Treisman, A.) 297–310 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rumiati, R. I. & Humphreys, G. W. Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 631–647 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, E. K. in Attention, Space and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience (eds. Humphreys, G. W., Duncan, J. & Treisman, A.) 251–272 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hodges, J. R., Spatt, J. & Patterson, K. “What” and “how”: evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9444–9448 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Driver, J. in Attention (ed. Pashler, H.) 279–310 (Taylor Francis, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson, B., Cockburn, J. & Halligan, P. W. Behavioural Inattention Test (Thames Valley Test Company, Titchfield, Hants., 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards, M. G. & Humphreys, G. W. Pointing and grasping in unilateral visual neglect: effect of on-line visual feedback in grasping. Neuropsychologia 37, 959–973 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Warrington, E. K. & James, M. The VOSP Test of Visual Function (NFER, Berkshire, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riddoch, M. J. & Humphreys, G. W. Birmingham Object Recognition Battery (BORB) (Psychology Press, London, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Balint, R. Seelenlahmung des “Schauens”: optische ataxie, raumliche Storung der Aufmerksamkeit. Monatschrift fur Neurologie und Psychiatrie 25, 51–81 (1909).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall, D., Humphreys, G. W. & Cooper, A. Reading using supra-letter units: Evidence from attentional dyslexia. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. (in press).

  19. Gilchrist, I., Humphreys, G. W. & Riddoch, M. J. Grouping and extinction: evidence for low-level modulation of selection. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 13, 1223–1256 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shalev, L. & Humphreys, G. W. Biased attentional shifts associated with unilateral left neglect. Cognit. Neuropsychol. 17, 339–364 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the MRC and the Wellcome Trust. We thank MP, MB and GK for their participation in these studies and V. Chavda for help with scan reconstruction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glyn W. Humphreys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Humphreys, G., Jane Riddoch, M. Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nat Neurosci 4, 84–88 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/82940

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/82940

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing