Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system

Abstract

SUBJECTIVE figures, seen in the absence of luminance gradients (Fig. 1), provide a phenomenal illusion that can be related to the properties of single cells in the visual cortex1, offering a rare bridge between brain function and visual awareness. It remains controversial whether subjective figures arise from intelligent cognitive mechanisms2–4, or from lower-level processes in early vision5,6. The cognitive account implies that the perception of subjective figures may require serial attentive processing, whereas on the low-level account they should arise in parallel at earlier visual stages. Physiological evidence apparently fits a low-level account7,8 and indicates that some types of subjective contour may be detected earlier than the conventional Kanizsa9 type. Here we report that even Kanizsa subjective figures can be detected without focal attention at parallel stages of the human visual system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peterhans, E. & von der Heydt, R. Trends Neurosci. 14, 112–119 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregory, R. L. Nature 238, 51–52 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coren, S. Psych. Rev. 79, 359–367 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rock, I. & Anson, R. Perception 8, 665–681 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brigner, W. L. & Gallagher, M. B. Percep. Motor Skills 38, 1047–1053 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, A. T. & Over, R. Nature 257, 581–582 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grosof, D. H., Shapley, R. M. & Hawken, M. J. Nature 365, 550–552 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E. & Baumgarter, G. Science 224, 1260–1262 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanizsa, G. Rivista di Psicologia 49, 7–30 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gurnsey, R., Humphrey, G. K. & Kapitan, P. Percep. Psychophys. 52, 263–276 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grabowecky, M. & Treisman, A. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci: suppl. 30, 457 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan, J. & Humphreys, G. W. Psych. Rev. 96, 433–458 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. Cog. Psych. 12, 97–136 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Enns, J. T. & Rensink, R. A. Science 247, 721–723 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Townsend, J. T. Percep. Psychophys. 10, 161–163 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Broadbent, D. E. in Modelling Cognition (ed. Morris, P.) 169–186 (Wiley, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ginsburg, A. P. Nature 257, 219–220 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pradzny, K. Percep. Psychophys. 34, 403–404 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Valois, R. L. & De Valois, K. K. Spatial Vision (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1990).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ginsburg, A. P. in The Perception of Illusory Contours (eds Petry, S. & Meyer, G. E.) 126–130 (Springer, New York, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramachandran, V. L. in The Perception of Illusory Contours (eds Petry, S. & Meyer, G. E.) 93–108 (Springer, New York, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Enns, J. T., Ochs, E. P. & Rensink, R, A. Behavior Research Instruments & Computers 22, 118–122 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Padich, R. A., Beckner, J. & Jones, S. Percep. Psychophys. 39, 219 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, G., Driver, J. Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system. Nature 371, 791–793 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/371791a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/371791a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing