Skip to main content

Fear and Psychological Reactance

Between- Versus Within-Individuals Perspectives

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000224

Abstract. Psychological reactance and related defensive processes have been long cited as an explanation for failure of fear appeal messages. The overwhelming majority of studies on fear and reactance have only examined the intensity of fear from a between-individuals perspective, in which individuals who have higher peak fear are predicted to experience stronger levels of psychological reactance. Recent development in the fear appeal research suggests an alternative perspective: Psychological reactance is activated when fear is aroused but not reduced within each individual; on the other hand, psychological reactance is mitigated or inhibited when fear is aroused and then reduced. Empirical data from a quasi-experimental study using graphic tobacco warning labels are used to test and compare the two approaches to studying the relationship between fear and psychological reactance. Implications for psychological reactance and fear appeal are discussed.

References

  • Algie, J. & Rossiter, J. R. (2010). Fear patterns: A new approach to designing road safety advertisements. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 38, 264–279. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2010.509019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benoit, W. L. (1998). Forewarning and persuasion. In M. AllenR. W. PreissEds., Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 139–154). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bessarabova, E., Fink, E. & Turner, M. (2013). Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: Comparative statistics. Human Communication Research, 39, 339–364. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boster, F. J. & Mongeau, P. (1984). Fear-arousing persuasive messages. In R. N. BostromEd., Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 330–375). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brehm, J. W., Miron, A. M. & Miller, K. (2009). Affect as a motivational state. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1069–1089. doi: 10.1080/02699930802323642 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brehm, S. S. & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buller, D. B., Burgoon, M., Hall, J. R., Levine, N., Taylor, A. N., Beach, B., … Melcher, C. (2000). Long-term effects of language intensity in preventive messages on planned family solar protection. Health Communication, 12, 262–275. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1203_03 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E. M., Broneck, K., Miller, C., Grandpre, J. R., Hall, J. R. & Frank, C. A. (2002). Using interactive media tools to test substance abuse prevention messages. In Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 67–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J. & Voulodakis, M. (2002). Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance: Communicating threats to attitudinal freedom. In J. P. DillardM. PfauEds., The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 213–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, H. & Sands, L. (2011). Gain- and loss-frame sun safety messages and psychological reactance adolescence. Communication Research Reports, 28, 308–317. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2011.616242 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coutler, R. H. & Pinto, M. B. (1995). Guilt appeals in advertising: What are their effects? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 697–705. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Hoog, N., Stroebe, W. & de Wit, J. B. F. (2007). Impact of vulnerability to severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11, 258–285. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.3.258 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dillard, J. P., Li, R., Meczkowski, E., Yang, C. & Shen, L. (in press). Fear responses to threat appeals: Functional form, methodological considerations, and correspondence between static and dynamic data. Communication Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dillard, J. P., Plotnick, C. A., Godbold, L. C., Freimuth, V. S. & Edgar, T. (1996). The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23, 44–72. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dillard, J. P. & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. doi: 10.1080/03637750500111815 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dillard, J. P., Shen, L. & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33, 467–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dolinski, D. & Nawrat, R. (1998). “Fear-then-relief” procedure for producing compliance: Beware when the danger is over. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 27–50. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1341 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Earl, A. & Albarracin, D. (2007). Nature, decay, and spiral of the effects of fear-inducing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Health Psychology, 26, 496–506. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.496 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freimuth, V. S., Hammond, S. L., Edgar, T. & Monahan, J. L. (1990). Reaching those at risk: A content analytic study of AIDS PSAs. Communication Research, 6, 775–791. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldstein, M. J. (1959). The relationship between coping and avoiding behavior and response to fear arousing propaganda. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 247–252. doi: 10.1037/h0044492 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hancock, G. R. & Lawrence, F. R. (2006). Using latent growth curve models to evaluate longitudinal change. In G. R. HancockR. O. MuellerEds., Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 171–186). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hovland, C., Janis, I. & Kelly, H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Janis, I. L. (1967). Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and research. In L. BerkowitzEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 167–222). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Janis, I. L. & Feshbach, S. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78–92. doi: 10.1037/h0060732 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Janis, I. L. & Terwilliger, R. F. (1962). An experimental study of psychological resistances to fear arousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 403–410. doi: 10.1037/h0047601 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jenkins, M. & Dragojevic, M. (2013). Explaining the process of resistance to persuasion: A politeness theory-based approach. Communication Research, 40, 559–590. doi: 10.1177/0093650211420136 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karno, M. P. & Longabaugh, R. (2005). Less directiveness by therapists improves drinking outcomes of reactant clients in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(2), 262–267. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.262 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leventhal, H. & Watts, J. C. (1966). Sources of resistance to fear-arousing communications on smoking and lung cancer. Journal of Personality, 34, 155–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1966.tb01706.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, I. M., Watson, B. C. & White, K. M. (2010). Response efficacy: The key to minimizing rejection and maximizing acceptance of emotion-based anti-speeding messages. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42, 459–467. doi: 10.1016/j. aap. 2009.09.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M. & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miron, A. M. & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory – 40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 9–18. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.3 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mongeau, P. A. (1998). Another look at fear-arousing persuasive appeals. In M. AllenR. W. PressEds., Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 53–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mongeau, P. A. (2013). Fear appeals. In J. P. DillardL. ShenEds., The handbook of persuasion (2nd edn., pp. 184–199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, K. (2005). Motivating women and men to take protective action against rape: Examining direct and indirect persuasive fear appeals. Health Communication, 18, 237–256. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1803_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moyer-Gusé, E. & Nabi, R. L. (2010). Explaining the persuasive effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: Overcoming resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 25–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peters, G. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C. & Kok, G. (2012). Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7(suppl. 1), S8–S31. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.703527 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461. doi: 10.1086/323732 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pfau, M. (1997). Inoculation model of resistance to influence. In G. A. BarnettF. J. BosterEds., Progress in communication studies: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 133–171). Greenwich, CT: Ablex. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pinto, M. B. & Priest, S. (1991). Guilt appeals in advertising: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 69, 375–385. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.375 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education and Behavior, 39, 455–473. doi: 10.1177/1090198111418108 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quick, B., Shen, L. & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance. In J. P. DillardL. ShenEds., The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 167–183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Quick, B. L. & Stephenson, M. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34, 255–276. doi: 10.1177/0093650207300427 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H. & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effect of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74, 229–255. doi: 10.1080/03637750701397098 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. CacioppoR. E. PettyEds., Social psychophysiology: A source book (pp. 153–176). New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rossiter, J. R. & Thornton, J. (2004). Fear-pattern analysis supports the fear-drive model for road safety TV-ads. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 945–960. doi: 10.1002/mar.20042 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruiter, R., Verplanken, B., De Cremer, D. & Kok, G. (2004). Danger and fear control in response to fear appeals: The role of need for cognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 13–24. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2601_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 397–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shen, L. (2011). The effectiveness of fear- vs. empathy-arousing anti-smoking PSAs. Health Communication, 26, 404–415. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.552480 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shen, L. (2015). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 30, 975–985. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.910882 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shen, L. & Dillard, J. P. (2014). Threat, fear, and persuasion: Review and critique of questions about functional form. Review of Communication Research, 2, 94–114. doi: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2014.02.01.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sutton, S. R. (1982). Fear-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research. In J. R. EisnerEd., Social psychology and behavioral medicine (pp. 303–337). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wicklund, R. A. (1974). Freedom and reactance. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349. doi: 10.1080/03637759209376276 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134. doi: 10.1080/03637759409376328 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Witte, K. (1998). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In P. A. AndersenL. K. GuerreroEds., Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications and contexts (pp. 423–450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Witte, K. & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591–615. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700506 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Witte, K. & Morrison, K. (1995). Using scare tactics to promote safer sex among juvenile detention and high school youth. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 128–142. doi: 10.1080/00909889509365419 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar