Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated that fear of confirming negative stereotypes (stereotype threat) can hamper women’s performance in certain mathematical and spatial tasks in which men usually excel. By contrast, very little is known about how men are affected by stereotype threat in tasks in which women excel. We therefore asked 36 men and 39 women, recruited at the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany, to complete two tests of verbal fluency (word fluency, four-word sentences). Prior to testing, participants were either told that gender differences in verbal abilities were going to be investigated or they received gender-neutral task instructions. We hypothesized that this would trigger the gender stereotype of women’s verbal superiority and, as a consequence, lead to a stereotype threat effect with decreased verbal fluency performance in men. However, men’s verbal fluency scores were higher under gender difference instructions than in the control condition. Since women showed a similar pattern and had generally higher scores, the gender difference remained stable across conditions. The findings may reflect (a) that gender stereotyping induced a competitive situation and, as a result, enhanced performance in all participants or (b) stereotype reactance in men, which would suggest that men and women react differently to gender stereotype activations in gender-sensitive cognitive abilities. Either way, the findings imply that cognitive performance changes significantly if participants are aware that cognitive gender differences are investigated, which is probably the case in many studies investigating gender differences.
References
(2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 387–409.
(2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 626–633.
(2005). Gender differences in relations of mental rotation, verbal fluency, and SAT scores to finger length ratios as hormonal indexes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 493–505.
(2006). Stereotype threat: The moderating role of locus of control beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 183–197.
(2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). Stereotypes and steroids: Using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition, 45, 392–414.
(2009). Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences – a psychobiosocial approach. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 389–401.
(1962). Leistungsprüfsystem (LPS)
[Achievement testing system (LPS)] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.(2007). Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 545–560.
(1988). Gender differences in verbal-ability – a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.
(2005). Knowing is half the battle – teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179.
(2007). Stereotype threat in classroom settings: The interactive effect of domain identification, task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students’ maths performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 323–338.
(2006). Gender differences in persistence and attributions in stereotype relevant contexts. Sex Roles, 54, 859–868.
(2000). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2005). Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity. Sex Roles, 52, 489–496.
(2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 399–411.
(2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942–958.
(2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199.
(1985). Emergence and characterization of sex-differences in spatial ability – a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.
(1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
(1990). Sex-differences in cognitive-abilities: A cross-cultural perspective. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1063–1077.
(2011). Stereotype Threat in Lern- und Leistungssituationen: Theoretische Ansätze, empirische Befunde und praktische Implikationen
[Stereotype threat in educational and competitive settings: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and practical implications] . In , Talentförderung – Expertiseentwicklung – Leistungsexzellenz (pp. 153–178). Berlin: LIT Verlag.(2012). When a new group identity does harm on the spot: Stereotype threat in newly created groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 65–71. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.840
(1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing. Behavior Genetics, 23, 337–341.
(2009). Are males always better than females in mental rotation? Exploring a gender belief explanation. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 21–27.
(2006). Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 369–377.
(2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314–1334.
(2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1067–1101.
(2004). Biosocial factors, sexual orientation and neurocognitive functioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 867–881.
(2006). Reducing Stereotype Threat by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 501–511.
(2007). Choking under pressure: When an additional positive stereotype affects performance for domain identified male mathematics students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 317–326.
(2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.
(1975). Verbaler-Kreativitäts-Test (VKT)
[Verbal creativity test (VKT)] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.(2002). Stereotype performance boosts: The impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 638–647.
(1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.
(2006). A stereotype boost or choking under pressure? Positive gender stereotypes and men who are low in domain identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 51–63.
(1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
(1997). A threat in the air – how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
(1995). Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test-Performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
(2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64, 324–335.
(1995). Magnitude of sex-differences in spatial abilities – a metaanalysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
(2003). Stereotype Lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467.
(2000). Testosterone and cognition in elderly men: A single testosterone injection blocks the practice effect in verbal fluency, but has no effect on spatial or verbal memory. Biological Psychiatry, 47, 650–654.
(2006). Stereotype susceptibility narrows the gender gap in imagined self-rotation performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 813–819.
(2007). Neural basis of stereotype-induced shifts in women’s mental rotation performance. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 12–19.
