The Influence of Job Candidates’ Physical Appearance on Interview Evaluations
A Prototype Matching Model
Abstract
Abstract. The influence of a candidate’s physical appearance on interview evaluations is well documented. However, few models exist that explain how and why specific components of physical appearance influence interviewer perceptions. We address this discrepancy by identifying the primary components of appearance and integrating findings from the appearance literature to explain the relationship between candidate appearance and interview evaluations. We propose that interviewers compare traits inferred from a candidate’s physical appearance with traits associated with their prototype for the job position. Interviewers perceive a strong person-job fit when these traits align, which is indicated by a prototype match. By detailing this progression in the proposed conceptual model, this paper answers calls from recent research and provides new directions for future inquiry.
References
(2011). The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021594
(1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.387
(1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
(1982). The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02197.x
(2012). Candidate characteristics driving initial impressions during rapport building: Implications for employment interview validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02036.x
(2009). What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1394–1411. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016532
(2016).
Fat women need not apply: Employment weight discrimination against women . In M. L. ConnerleyJ. WuEds., Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 868–881). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_3(1998). Territory assignment decisions and supervising unethical selling behavior: The effects of obesity and gender as moderated by job-related factors. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 18, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.1998.10754129
(1981). Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review, 6, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1981.4287782
(1981). A clarification of some issues regarding the development and use of Behaviorally Anchored Ratings Scales (BARS). Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.4.458
(1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00226.x
(1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645
(1987). Personal constructs, performance schemata, and “folk theories” of subordinate effectiveness: Exploration in an army officer sample. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90018-5
(1992). Seeing is believing: Facial appearance, credibility, and attitude change. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990325
(1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043805
(1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
(1998). Relations between different sources of information in the structured selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 51, 963–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00747.x
(1996). Research on entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Small Business Management, 34, 35–45.
(1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.38
(1982). A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90004-4
(2010). Individual differences and weight bias: Do people with an anti-fat bias have a pro-thin bias? Body Image, 7, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.11.005
(2009). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1194–1198.
(2008). Stature and status: Height, ability, and labor market outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 499–532. https://doi.org/10.1086/589524
(1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.218
(1990). In search of a common thread: Classification of information communicated through dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800201
(2009). Can nonverbal cues be used to make meaningful personality attributions in employment interviews? Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9098-0
(2015). Why your stigma isn’t hired: A dual-process framework of interview bias. Human Resource Management Review, 26, 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.09.006
(1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
(1994).
Structured and unstructured selection interview: Beyond the job-fit model . In G. R. FerrisEd., Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 79–123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.(2016). Beneath the beard: Do facial morphometrics influence the strength of judgments of men’s beardedness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.08.004
(1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
(1991).
Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique . In C. L. CooperI. T. RobertsonEds., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 283–357). Oxford, UK: Wiley.(1984). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
(1984). People can be too perfect: Effects of subjects’ and targets’ attractiveness on interpersonal attraction. Psychological Reports, 55, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.2.351
(2015). Facing our ancestors: Judgements of aggression are consistent and related to the facial width-to-height ratio in men irrespective of beards. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.12.005
(2014). Better not look too nice? Employees’ preferences towards (un)likeable managers. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.02.001
(1985). Nonverbal cues in the employment interview: Links between applicant qualities and interviewer judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.729
(1998).
Ordinary personology . In D. T. GilbertS. T. FiskeG. LindzeyEds., The handbook of social psychology (pp. 788–827). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.(1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
(2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.379
(2014). Body weight bias in hiring decisions: Identifying explanatory mechanisms. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.3.353
(1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6
(1995). Testing the prototype theory of concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 686–708. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1031
(2014). “Big” men: Male leaders’ height positively relates to followers’ perception of charisma. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 190–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.014
(2000). Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspect of physiognomy. Journal of Personality, 78, 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.837
(2015). Picking teams: When dominant facial structure is preferred. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.007
(1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298.
(1995). Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don’t know. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 3–26.
(1979). When beauty is beastly: The effect of applicant sex and information tpe on preliminary employment decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90003-5
(2012). People with dark personalities tend to create a physically attractive veneer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 461–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612461284
(2008). Prototypes and personal templates: Collective wisdom and individual differences. Psychological Review, 115, 1054–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013122
(2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56, 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x
(2015). Unbuttoned: The interaction between provocativeness of female work attire and occupational status. Sex Roles, 72, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0450-8
(2011). An empirical review of the employment interview construct literature. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00535.x
(2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.897
(2006). Recruiters’ perceptions of appearance: The stigma of image norms. Equal Opportunities International, 25, 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150610713755
(1992). Height stereotypes of women and men: The liabilities of shortness for both sexes. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1992.9924723
(2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428
(2000). The employment interview: A review of recent research and recommendations for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 383–406.
(2013). City employee perceptions of the impact of dress and appearance: You are what you wear. Public Personnel Management, 42, 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013495772
(2015). Looking too old? How an older age appearance reduces chances of being hired. British Journal of Management, 27, 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12125
(2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643–671.
(2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
(1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.284
(2004). Selection interviews of overweight job applicants: Can structure reduce the bias? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1993–2022.
(2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
(2013). Telling facial metrics: Facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005
(1984). Attire, physical appearance, and first impressions: More is less. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X8400300101
(2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12052
(2014). Facial appearance and leader choice in different contexts: Evidence for task contingent selection based on implicit and learned face-behaviour/face-ability associations. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.002
(2012). Evolution, appearance, and occupational success. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 782–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000503
(2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00081-9
(2009). The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.006
(1987). Affect, personality, and facial expressive characteristics of older people. Psychology and Aging, 2, 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.1.64
(2013). Shorn scalps and perceptions of male dominance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 198–205. Retrieved from http://spp.sagepub.com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/content/4/2/198
(1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11–21. https://doi.org/0021-9010/96/S3.00
(1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.215
(1990). Physical attractiveness and selection decision making. Journal of Management, 16, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600104
(1993). Nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.218
(1980). The role of height and weight in the performance of salesmen of ordinary life insurance. Journal of the American Society of CLU, 34, 56–64.
(2006). Personality and misconduct correlates of body modification and other cultural deviance markers. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.002
(2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209346309
(1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250
(2014). The many (distinctive) faces of leadership: Inferring leadership domain from facial appearance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 817–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.002
(2006). Personality judgements from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 2441, 607–640. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607
(1994). A prototype matching approach to understanding the role of applicant gender and age in the evaluation of job applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1433–1473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01558.x
(1994). Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 909–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.909
(1977). MMPI Profiles of obese men and women. Psychological Reports, 41, 731–734.
(2007). Facial symmetry is positively associated with self-reported extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1572–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.014
(1993). Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy of Management Review, 18, 32–55. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997506
(2012). Apparent height and body mass index influence perceived leadership ability in three-dimensional faces. Perception, 41, 1477–1485. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7342
(1988). The relative effects of verbal and nonverbal behavior, appearance, and social skills on evaluations made in hiring interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00020.x
(2012). Rater training revisited: An updated meta-analytic review of frame-of-reference training. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02045.x
(1999). Weight-based discrimination in employment: Psychological and legal aspects. Personnel Psychology, 52, 969–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00186.x
(2008). Investigating the validity and normal personality traits: The relationship between body weight and normal personality traits. Group & Organization Management, 33, 392–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108321518
(1973).
On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories . In T. E. MooreEd., Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Academic Press.(2009). A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.008
(2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031050
(2014). The influence of economic context on the relationship between chief executive officer facial appearance and company profits. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 846–854. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.01.001
(1989). Strategic job analysis. Human Resource Management, 28, 51–63.
(1983). Prototype salience and implicit personality theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.712
(2008). Job analysis for a changing workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.004
(1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047060
(2014). The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 805–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.001
(2012). Facing the situation: Testing a biosocial contingency model of leadership in intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.006
(2011).
Leadership in organizations: An evolutionary perspective . In G. SaadEd., Evolutionary psychology in the business sciences (pp. 165–190). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92784-6(2015). Factors affecting hiring decisions about veterans. Human Resource Management Review, 25, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.06.003
(1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.778
(2012). The face of leadership: Perceiving leaders from facial expression. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 545–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.007
(2008). Using frame-of-reference training to understand the implications of rater idiosyncrasy for rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.711
(2015). Changing the personality of a face: Perceived big two and big five personality factors modeled in real photographs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000064
(2007). Employee experience of aesthetic labour in retail and hospitality. Work, Employment & Society, 21, 103–120.
(2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
(1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00562.x
(1994). Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0103_2
(2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497–1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.x
(2004). Sensitivity to “bad genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JONB.0000039648.30935.1b
(1998). Salespersons’ weight and ratings of characteristics related to effectiveness of selling. Psychological Reports, 82, 947–952. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1998.82.3.947
