Abstract
Abstract. There is ample evidence for the central role of morality in social judgments. However, research has not examined whether perceived morality of others also drives perceived humanness, nor has it extensively considered its behavioral consequences. These issues were addressed across two studies. Study 1 revealed that information about a target person’s morality increased his/her perceived humanness, which in turn explained positive behavioral intentions toward him/her. Study 2 pointed out that information about a target person’s morality increased unselfish behaviors toward him/her. This effect was explained by perceived humanness of the target. Implications of the relationship between morality, perceived humanness, and unselfish behaviors are discussed.
References
2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.574
(2012). Reducing dehumanization outcomes towards Blacks: The role of multiple categorization and of human identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 875–882.
(2014). Social equality in the number of choice options is represented in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(18), 6413–6421.
(2006). Conceptual beliefs about human values and their implications: Human nature beliefs predict value importance, value tradeoffs, and responses to value-laden rhetoric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.351
(2012). Folk psychologies of humanness: Beliefs about distinctive and core human characteristics in three countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111419029
(2013). Trust, punishment, and cooperation across 18 societies: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613488533
(2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS One, 8, e61842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061842
(2013). Losing our humanity: The self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 156–169.
(2010). Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 107–113.
(2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X521383
(2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
(2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering). European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
(2016). Honesty and dishonesty don’t move together: Trait content information influences behavioral synchrony. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0229-9
(2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
(2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x
(2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
(2007). What do people desire in others? A socio-functional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208
(2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
(2007). Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207071344
(1999). The double meaning of a single act: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on cooperative behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 13, 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<305::AID-EJSP929>3.0.CO;2-R
(2004). Dimensions of “uniquely” and “non‐uniquely” human emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930244000444
(2013). The Bonobo and the atheist: In search of humanism among the primates. New York, NY: Norton.
(2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 160–193.
(2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825
(2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726
(2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
(2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
(2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
(1973). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 25–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00102.x
(2009). You want to appear competent? Be mean! You want to appear sociable? Be lazy! Group differentiation and the compensation effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013320
(2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
(2013).
(Groups and morality . In J. SimpsonJ. F. DovidioEds., APA handbook of personality and social psychology. Interpersonal relationships and group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 123–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
(2018). Giving others the option of choice: An fMRI study on low-cost cooperation. Neuropsychologia, 109, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.009
(2007). Infra‐humanization: The wall of group differences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 139–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00006.x
(2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
(2001). Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.50
(2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/14342-010
(2018). Think it through before making a choice? Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.001
(1990). Deterring moral exclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00280.x
(2013). Initial impressions determine behaviours: Morality predicts the willingness to help newcomers. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1508-y
(2008, January). The moral instinct. The New York Times Magazine, 32–37, 52–58.
(2016). Humanizing outgroups through multiple categorization: The roles of individuation and threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216636624
(2016). Encouraging majority support for immigrant access to health services: Multiple categorization and social identity complexity as antecedents of health equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216629814
(2015). Counter-stereotypes reduce emotional intergroup bias by eliciting surprise in the face of unexpected category combinations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.06.004
(2016). Predicting support for Arabs’ autonomy from social dominance: The role of identity complexity and dehumanization. Political Psychology, 37(2), 293–301.
(2015). Some extended psychological benefits of challenging social stereotypes: Decreased dehumanization and a reduced reliance on heuristic thinking. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 801–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214567762
(2016). Bad guys suffer less (social pain): Moral status influences judgements of others’ social suffering. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12114
(1981). The expanding circle. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
(2012). Embodied impression formation: Social judgments and motor cues to approach and avoidance. Social Cognition, 30, 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.232
(2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
(2002). The lost e‐mail: Prosocial reactions induced by uniquely human emotions. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602321149867
(2017). Class impressions: Higher social class elicits lower prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.001
(2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032540
(1998). Being more honest but not necessarily more intelligent than others: Generality and explanations for The Muhammad Ali effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<675::AID-EJSP883>3.0.CO;2-5
(2015). Social mindfulness and social hostility. Current Opinions in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.12.009
(2015). Moral impression management evaluation by an ingroup member during a moral IAT affects perceptual attention and conflict and response monitoring. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 183–192. https://doi.org/0.1177/1948550614548076
(2013). Dehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.006
(1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York, NY: Basic Book.
(2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
(2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500229619
(2010).
(Intergroup relations . In S. T. FiskeD. T. GilbertG. LindzeyEds., Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1024–1083). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.