Powerful People Feel Less Fear of Negative Evaluation
The Mediating Role of Personal Control Belief
Abstract
Abstract. To directly examine why an individual’s capacity to influence others by providing valued resources (i.e., power) could decrease the concerns about negative evaluation from others (i.e., the fear of negative evaluation, FNE) in daily life, two studies were conducted. Results found that perceived power (Study 1) was associated with lower FNE, and manipulating power levels (Study 2) caused less FNE. Furthermore, results indicate that personal control belief mediated this link. These findings provide empirical evidence of the underlying mechanism of the effect of power on reducing FNE. The current research contributes significantly because it sheds light on how power transferred from a person’s “external world” to their “internal world” (i.e., personal control belief) can influence their cognition and behavior.
References
2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1362
(2006). Power, optimism, and risk‐taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.324
(2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x
(2003).
(Social structure, stress, and personal control . In S. H. ZaritL. I. PearlinK. W. SchaieEds., Personal control in social and life course contexts (pp. 127–164). New York, NY: Springer.2017). Felt power explains the link between position power and experienced emotions. Emotion, 17(1), 55–66. doi: 10.1037/emo0000207
(2015). Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1286–1295. doi: 10.1037/a0038543
(2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x
(2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
(2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466. doi: 10.1037/a0012633
(2006). Minority status decreases sense of control and increases interpretive processing. Social Cognition, 24, 169–186. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.169
(1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.284
(2010). Power and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.01.001
(2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science, 22, 1042–1048. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413936
(2015). Power affects performance when the pressure is on: Evidence for low-power threat and high-power lift. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 726–735. doi: 10.1177/0146167215577365
(2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
(2000). Social anxiety, self-regulation, and fear of negative evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 14, 347–358. doi: 10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4<347::AID-PER381>3.0.CO;2-7
(2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776–779. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008
(2016). To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 498–512. doi: 10.1177/0146167216634064
(1983). A brief version of the fear of negative evaluation scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371–375. doi: 10.1177/0146167283093007
(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
(1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21. doi: 10.2307/2136319
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
(1986). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control. Science, 233, 1271–1276. doi: 10.1126/science.3749877
(2000). Effects of perceived control on the outcomes of workplace aggression and violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 386–402. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.386
(2012). Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: Evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 371–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.014
(2013). Power increases performance in a social evaluation situation as a result of decreased stress responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 201–211. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1937
(2014). Where could we stand if I had…? How social power impacts counterfactual thinking after failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.005
(