The Experience of Mobile Entrapment in Daily Life
Abstract
Abstract. This multistudy investigation examines how entrapment, which is the guilt, anxiety, or stress to respond and be available to others via mobile devices, shapes and is shaped by patterns of mobile use. Using structural equation modeling on cross-sectional survey responses, Study 1 (N = 300) tested relationships among offline social network size, voice and text frequency, entrapment, and well-being. Offline social network size was associated with text message frequency, and both were indirectly associated with lower subjective well-being via entrapment. Study 2 used experience sampling to confirm associations among entrapment, texting, and well-being. Participants (N = 112) reported on face-to-face, phone, and text interactions five times a day for 5 consecutive days (n = 1,879). Multilevel modeling results indicated that beginning-of-week entrapment was associated with more interactions with acquaintances and strangers, and with reporting lower affective well-being and relatedness when interacting via text. Well-being reported during text interactions and number of interactions with acquaintances and strangers during the week both predicted changes in entrapment by the week’s end. Change in entrapment was associated with lower subjective well-being at the week’s end. Results suggest that entrapment is associated with using texting to maintain larger networks of social relationships, potentially stressing individuals’ capacity to maintain less close relationships via mobile communication.
References
(2003). On the phenomenology of technology: The “Janus” faces of mobile phones. Information and Organization, 13, 231–256. doi: 10.1016/S1471-7727(03)00013-7
(2011). Concerns about mobile phones: A cross-national study. First Monday, 16. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3335/3032
(2015). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory, 26, 128–149. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12067
(2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
(2015). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6, 293–339.
(2008). Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 346–360. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.019
(2011). The niches of interpersonal media: Relationships in time and space. New Media & Society, 13, 1265–1282. doi: 10.1177/1461444811403445
(2012). Social cognition on the internet: Testing constraints on social network size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0121
(2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59, 19–36. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
(2012). Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over)dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media & Society, 14, 315–330. doi: 10.1177/1461444811415047
(2014). Put down that phone and talk to me: Understanding the roles of mobile phone norm adherence and similarity in relationships. Mobile Media & Communication, 2, 134–153. doi: 10.1177/2050157913517684
(2013). Comparing happiness effects of real and on-line friends. PLoS One, 8(9), e72754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072754
(2012). Mobile voice communication and loneliness: Cell phone use and the social skills deficit hypothesis. New Media & Society, 15, 1094–1111. doi: 10.1177/146144812466715
(2002).
Introduction: Framing the issues . In J. E. KatzM. AakhusEds., Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 1–13). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.(2014). Connection overload? A cross-cultural study of the consequences of social media connection. Information Systems Management, 31, 59–73. doi: 10.1080/10580530.2014.854097
(2008).
The mobile phone’s ring . In J. E. KatzEd., Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 139–152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
(2012). The socio-demographics of texting: An analysis of traffic data. New Media & Society, 14, 280–297. doi: 10.1177/1461444811412711
(2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856. doi: 10.111/jcom.12251
(2014). A tethered generation: Exploring the role of mobile phones in the daily life of young people. Mobile Media & Communication, 2, 58–72. doi: 10.1177/205015791350558
(2016). Competing discourses and meaning-making in talk about romantic partners’ cell-phone contact with non-present others. Communication Studies, 67(1), 58–67. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2015.1088876
(2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44, 737–759. doi: 10.1177/0013916511404408
(1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
(2012). Explaining the use of three text-based communication media: An examination of three theories of media use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 357–363. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0121
. (2014). Mobile technology fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-fact-sheet/
(2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
(2017). Digital stress over the life span: The effects of communication load and Internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychology, 20, 90–115. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832
(2014). Persistence of social signatures in human communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 942–947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308540110
(2011). Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults – a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 11, Article 66. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/66
(2012). How friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107, 509–529. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9861-2
(1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.
(2014). Digital stress: Adolescents’ personal accounts. New Media & Society, 22, 1–19. doi: 10.1177/1461444814543989
(2006). Comparing groups in a before-after design: When t test and ANCOVA produce different results. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 663–675. doi: 10.1348/000709905X52210
