Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Enhancing Selective Exposure to Health Messages and Health Intentions

Effects of Susceptibility Cues and Gain–Loss Framing

Published Online:January 18, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000197

Abstract

Abstract. Insufficient message exposure is still a major obstacle for effective health communication activities, and little is known on how message features affect selective exposure and persuasion. This study examined the effects of two health message features, suggested susceptibility and gain–loss framing, on respondents’ selective exposure and subsequent health behavior intentions. Two personality traits, repression-sensitization and approach/avoidance motivation, were studied as moderators of the proposed relationships. An experimental 2 (suggested susceptibility: low vs. high) × 2 (gain–loss framing: gain- vs. loss-framed message) study was conducted. Participants browsed through an online health magazine while their message choices were unobtrusively logged. A subsequent online questionnaire assessed personality dispositions and behavioral intentions. High levels of message susceptibility increased both selective exposure to health messages and respondents’ motivation to engage in adaptive health behaviors. Gain–loss framing did not affect message exposure or behavioral intentions, with one exception: Avoidance-oriented low-anxious respondents selected more loss-framed than gain-framed articles for reading. Repression-sensitization and approach/avoidance motivation did not moderate health message effects, but partly influenced these measures directly or in combination. The number of articles to choose from was limited, and it is unclear to what extent the findings can be generalized to other, more familiar health topics. Emphasizing readers’ susceptibility to health threats appears very effective for increasing exposure to health messages and protective behavioral intentions. The effectiveness of gain–loss framing, by contrast, largely depends on moderating factors.

References

  • Armstrong, J. S. (2010). Persuasive advertising: Evidence-based principles. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barbour, J. B., Rintamaki, L. S., Ramsey, J. A. & Brashers, D. E. (2011). Avoiding health information. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 212–229. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.585691 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berry, D. C. (2004). Risk, communication and health psychology. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D. & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, D. (1964). Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In B. A. MaherEd., Progress in experimental personality research (pp. 170–215). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Case, D. O., Andrews, J. E., Johnson, J. D. & Allard, S. L. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93, 353–362. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cooper, C. P. & Roter, D. L. (2000). “If it bleeds it leads”? Attributes of TV health news stories that drive viewer attention. Public Health Reports, 115, 331–338. doi: 10.1093/phr/115.4.331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corcoran, N. (2010). Communicating health: Strategies for health promotion. London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Das, E. H. H. J., de Wit, J. B. F. & Stroebe, W. (2003). Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: Evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 650–664. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Derakshan, N., Eysenck, M. W. & Myers, L. B. (2007). Emotional information processing in repressors: The vigilance-avoidance theory. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 1585–1614. doi: 10.1080/02699930701499857 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2003). The linear interaction model of personality effects in health communication. Health Communication, 15, 101–115. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1501_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dziokonski, W. & Weber, S. J. (1977). Repression-sensitization, perceived vulnerability, and the fear appeal communication. The Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 105–112. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1977.9713245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferguson, E. (2013). Personality is of central concern to understand health: Towards a theoretical model for health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 7, S32–S70. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2010.547985 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fox, S. & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gallagher, K. M. & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annual Behavior Medicine, 43, 101–116. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gayton, W. F., Ozmon, K. L., Bassett, J. S. & Tavormina, J. (1976). Perceived vulnerability to illness and the repression-sensitization dimension. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 616–618. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197607)32:3<616::AID-JCLP2270320328>3.0.CO;2-S First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gordon, J. E. (1957). Interpersonal predictions of repressors and sensitizers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 686–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1957.tb01557.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1972). The structure of the emotions and the limbic system. In R. PorterJ. KnightEds., Physiology, emotion & psychosomatic illness (pp. 87–120). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Associated Scientific Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1991). Fear, panic, and anxiety: What’s in a name? Psychological Inquiry, 2, 77–78. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0201_18 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harrison, J. A., Mullen, P. D. & Green, L. W. (1992). A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Education Research, 7, 107–116. doi: 10.1093/her/7.1.107 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hartig, J. & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Die “ARES-Skalen” zur Erfassung der individuellen BIS- und BAS-Sensitivität: Entwicklung einer Lang- und einer Kurzfassung.[The ARES-scales as measurement of individual BIS- and BAS-sensitivity: Development of a long and a short questionnaire version] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 293–310. doi: 10.1024/0170-1789.24.4.293 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Hastall, M. R. (2011). Kommunikation von Gesundheitsrisiken in Massenmedien: Der Einfluss von Informations- und Rezipientenmerkmalen auf die Botschaftszuwendung und–vermeidung, [Communicating health risks through mass media: The impacts of message characteristics and reader characteristics on message exposure and message avoidance] Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hastall, M. R. & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013a). Caught in the act: Measuring selective exposure to experimental online stimuli. Communication Methods and Measures, 7, 94–105. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2012.761190 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hastall, M. R. & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2013b). Severity, efficacy, and evidence type as determinants of health message exposure. Health Communication, 28, 378–388. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.690175 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hastall, M. R. & Sukalla, F. (2013). Multiples Framing in der Gesundheitskommunikation: Annahmen und Befunde. [Multiple framing in health communication: Theoretical assumptions and findings]. In C. RossmannM. R. Hastall (Eds.), Medien und Gesundheitskommunikation: Befunde, Entwicklungen, Herausforderungen (pp. 201–218). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hornik, R. C. (2002). Public health communication: Making sense of contradictory evidence. In R. C. HornikEd., Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 1–19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Huwe, S., Hennig, J. & Netter, P. (1996). Das Repression-Sensitization-Coping-Inventar (RSCI).[The repression-sensitization coping inventory (RSCI)]. Diagnostica, 42, 157–174. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, D. J. & Case, D. O. (2012). Health information seeking. New York, NY: Peter Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206. doi: 10.1257/jep.5.1.193 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kanouse, D. E. (1984). Explaining negativity biases in evaluation and choice behavior: Theory and research. In T. C. KinnearEd., Advances in consumer research (Vol. 11, pp. 703–708). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kepplinger, H. M. (2008). News values. In W. DonsbachEd., The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 3281–3286). Malden, MA: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, H. J. (2012). The effects of gender and gain versus loss frame on processing breast cancer screening messages. Communication Research, 39, 385–412. doi: 10.1177/0093650211427557 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, J., Kim, J.-H. & Seo, M. (2014). Toward a person × situation model of selective exposure: Repressors, sensitizers, and choice of online news on financial crisis. Journal of Media Psychology, 26, 59–69. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000111 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Knobloch, S., Carpentier, F. D. & Zillmann, D. (2003). Effects of salience dimensions of informational utility on selective exposure to online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 91–108. doi: 10.1177/107769900308000107 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2008). Informational utility. In W. DonsbachEd., International encyclopedia of communication (pp. 2273–2276). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Sharma, N., Hansen, D. L. & Alter, S. (2005). Impact of popularity indications on readers’ selective exposure to online news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 296–313. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knowles, E. S. & Linn, J. A. (2004). Resistance and persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krohne, H. W. & Schroeder, H. M. (1972). Anxiety defense and complex information processing. Archiv für Psychologie, 124, 50–61. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mann, T., Sherman, D. & Updegraff, J. (2004). Dispositional motivations and message framing: A test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychology, 23, 330–334. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.330 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Milne, S., Sheeran, P. & Orbell, S. (2000). Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: A meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 106–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mutz, D. C. & Young, L. (2011). Communication and public opinion: Plus ça change? Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 1018–1044. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr052 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Myers, L. B. (2010). The importance of the repressive coping style: Findings from 30 years of research. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 23, 3–17. doi: 10.1080/10615800903366945 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nan, X. (2012). Communicating to young adults about HPV vaccination: Consideration of message framing, motivation, and gender. Health Communication, 27, 10–18. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.567447 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Niederdeppe, J., Bu, Q. L., Borah, P., Kindig, D. A. & Robert, S. A. (2008). Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities. Milbank Quarterly, 86, 481–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00530.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Keefe, D. J. (2012). From psychological theory to message design: Lessons from the story of gain-framed and loss-framed persuasive messages. In H. ChoEd., Health communication message design: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Keefe, D. J. & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of non-compliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. In C. S. BeckEd., Communication yearbook 30 (pp. 1–43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Keefe, D. J. & Jensen, J. D. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59, 51–67. doi: 10.1080/10510970701849388 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Keefe, D. J. & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • O’Keefe, D. J. & Nan, X. (2012). The relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: A meta-analytic review. Health Communication, 27, 776–783. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.640974 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peeters, G. & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. In W. StroebeM. HewstoneEds., European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 33–60). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenstock, I. M. (1960). What research in motivation suggests for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 50, 295–302. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.50.3_Pt_1.295 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roth, S. & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41, 813–819. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.7.813 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J. & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, S202–S220. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sellnow, T. L., Ulmer, R. R., Seeger, M. W. & Littlefield, R. S. (2009). Effective risk communication: A message-centered approach. New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sherman, D. K., Mann, T. & Updegraff, J. A. (2006). Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 164–168. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9001-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46, 32–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stroebe, W. (2011). Social psychology and health. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tanner, J. F. J., Hunt, J. B. & Eppright, D. R. (1991). The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing, 55, 36–45. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tauscher, L. & Greenberg, S. (1997). Revisitation patterns in World Wide Web navigation. Human factors in computing systems: Proceedings of CHI 97. New York, NY: ACM Press, 399–406. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van’t Riet, J. & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2013). Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7, S104–S136. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2011.606782 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weinstein, N. D. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 7, 355–386. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.7.4.355 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wise, K., Eckler, P., Kononova, A. & Littau, J. (2009). Exploring the hardwired for news hypothesis: How threat proximity affects the cognitive and emotional processing of health-related print news. Communication Studies, 60, 268–287. doi: 10.1080/10510970902956024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349. doi: 10.1080/03637759209376276 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Witte, K., Meyer, G. & Martell, D. P. (2001). Effective health risk messages: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yan, C., Dillard, J. P. & Shen, F. (2012). Emotion, motivation, and the persuasive effects of message framing. Journal of Communication, 62, 682–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01655.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56, S221–S237. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00291.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar