Measuring Media Multitasking
Development of a Short Measure of Media Multitasking for Adolescents
Abstract
Abstract. Although media multitasking is an increasingly occurring form of media use, there are currently no validated, short instruments to measure media multitasking among adolescents. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to develop a short media multitasking measure for adolescents (MMM-S). Two studies with a total sample of 2,278 adolescents were conducted. The findings of these studies suggest that the MMM-S is a useful, reliable, and valid measure to assess media multitasking among adolescents. The findings indicate that the concurrent validity of the short measure is equal to that of a more extensive measure. Because of its high utility, the MMM-S may provide an alternative for existing extensive measures of media multitasking.
References
2013). The association between media multitasking, task-switching, and dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1485–1495. doi: 10.1037/a0031208
(2014). The relationship between media multitasking and executive function in early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 1120–1144. doi: 10.1177/0272431614523133
(2013). Media multitasking is associated with symptoms of depression and social anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 132–135. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0291
(2013). Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 508–519. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12021
(2000). Children as respondents in survey research: Cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 66, 60–75.
(2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education, 54, 927–931. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024
(2011). Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. Perception, 40, 1183–1192. doi: 10.1068/p7017
(2008). Media multitasking: Issues posed in measuring the effects of television sexual content exposure. Communication Methods and Measures, 2, 65–79. doi: 10.1080/19312450802063255
(2004). Watching sex on television predicts adolescent initiation of sexual behavior. Pediatrics, 114, E280–E289.
(2014). Doing it all: An exploratory study of predictors of media multitasking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14, 11–23.
(2006). Media multitasking among american youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
(2002). Profiles of everyday executive function in acquired and developmental disorders. Child Neuropsychology : A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 8, 121–137.
(2011). Age-related changes in executive function: A normative study with the Dutch version of the behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF). Child Neuropsychology, 17, 51–66. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2010.509715
(2012). No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Computers & Education, 59, 505–514. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023
(2014). Development and validation of the single item narcissism scale (SINS). PLOS One, 9(8), e103469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103469
(2008). Communication Methods and Measures, 2, 6–22. doi: 10.1080/19312450802063024
(2007). Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 560–566.
(2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 647–653. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0245-7
(2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1274–1281. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0456-6
(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
(2012). Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1097–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.016
(2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15581–15587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903620106
(1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1
(2012). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 48, 327–336. doi: 10.1037/a0027030
(2014). Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life. Psychological Research, 78, 661–669. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0523-7
(2010). Generation M2.media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
(2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 948–958. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001
(2013). Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking. PloS One, 8, e54402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054402
(2010). Alles over tijd. Tijdbestedingsonderzoek 2010
. ([About time. Time use research 2010] . Amstelveen, NL: SPOT.2012). Alles over tijd. Tijdbestedingsonderzoek 2012
. ([About time. Time use research 2012] . Amstelveen, NL: SPOT.2009). Measuring children’s media use in the digital age. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1152–1176. doi: 10.1177/0002764209331539
(2013). Age differences in media multitasking: A diary study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 392–408. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2013.816709
(2010). The impacts of media multitasking on children’s learning and development: Report from a research seminar. New York, NY: The Joan Conney Center at Sesame Workshop.
(2014). Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication, 64, 167–192. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12070
(