Disclosing Brand Placements in Movies
Effects of Disclosure Type and Movie Involvement on Attitudes
Abstract
Abstract. Recently, the European Union has decided that disclosures of brand placement are obligatory. However, the effects of such disclosures remain largely unstudied. Departing from theoretical notions of the persuasion knowledge model, this study examined how different types of disclosures and viewer involvement with a movie clip affected attitudes toward the placed brand. In addition, the role of attitude toward the placement as mediator was tested. The study employed a one-factorial (no disclosure, disclosure of source, disclosure of source and intent) between-subjects design using an online survey (N = 191). The results showed that disclosure of both the commercial source and the persuasive intent of brand placement resulted in more negative placement attitudes and in turn in more negative brand attitudes than in the absence of a disclosure. In addition, involvement with the movie moderated the disclosure effects: The brand attitudes of high-involved viewers became more negative via placement attitudes when disclosures were shown, regardless of the type of disclosure. For low-involved viewers, a disclosure of both the commercial source and the persuasive intent was necessary to affect brand attitude negatively via placement attitude. These results show that brand placement disclosures can mitigate persuasion. However, the effects depend on the disclosure type and movie involvement. These findings have important implications for theory, legislation, and practice.
References
(2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitude and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 87–101.
(1990). Ease of message processing as moderator of repetition effects in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 345–353.
(1990). The role of mood in advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 203–214.
(2005). Better disclosure: How to make product integration more transparent for viewers. Mediaweek, 15, 19.
(2012). Sponsorship disclosure: Effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and brand responses. Journal of Communication, 62, 1047–1064.
(2014). Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: A study on the effectiveness of European disclosure regulations. Psychology & Marketing, 31, 214–224.
(1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 34–51.
(2010). Introducing the PCMC model: An investigative framework for young people’s processing of commercialized media content. Communication Theory, 20, 427–450.
(2011). Embedded advertising on television: Disclosure, deception, and free speech rights. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30, 226–238.
(2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69–83.
(2013). Can disclosures lead consumers to resist covert persuasion? the important roles of disclosure timing and type of response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 483–495.
(1990). Brand usage: A factor in consumer beliefs. Marketing Research, 2, 14–20.
(2008). When product placement goes wrong. Journal of Advertising, 37, 89–98.
(2013). Brand placement disclosures to mitigate persuasion: The role of celebrity endorsement and disclosure type. Journal of Promotion Management, 19, 224–240.
(2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31, 83–95.
(1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1–31.
(1975). Temporal delay, type of forewarning, and resistance to influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 459–469.
(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analyses. New York: Guilford Press.
(2013). User ratings for Spider-Man, Retrieved from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt
(2013). Influence of age-rating label salience on perception and evaluation of media: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, & Applications, 25, 83–94. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000086
(2001). On the deceptive effectiveness of labeled and unlabeled advertorial formats. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 265–281.
(1998). The role of affect in attitude formation: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 143–152.
(2010). Examining the covert nature of product placement: Implications for public policy. Journal of Promotion Management, 16, 59–79.
(1993). Advertising and publicity: An information processing perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 57–84.
(1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 130–143.
(1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318–332.
(2007). The effects of program-involvement on commercial exposure and recall in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Advertising, 36, 121–137.
(2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion. explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18, 407–425.
(1998). Ethical dimensions of advertising executions. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 805–815.
(2009). Increased persuasion knowledge of video news releases: Audience beliefs about news and support for source disclosure. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 24, 220–237.
(1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.
(1996). The aad-ab-pi relationship in children: The impact of brand familiarity and measurement timing. Psychology & Marketing, 13, 77–105.
(2008).
Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research . In A. F. HayesM. D. SlaterL. B. SnyderEds., Advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.(2005). A managerial investigation into the product placement industry. Journal of Advertising Research, 45, 73–92.
(1993). The effects of length, content, and repetition on television commercial effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 91–104.
(2002). Effects of threatening visuals and announcer differences on responses to televised alcohol warnings. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 27–49.
(2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191.
(2002). Audience involvement and entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12, 153–172.
(2014). Bioscoopmonitor 2013/2014, Retrieved from http://www.filmonderzoek.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/DEF-Bioscoopmonitor-2013-2014-webversie.pdf
(1987). Classical conditioning of consumer attitudes: Four experiments in an advertising context. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 334–349.
(1995). Program involvement: Are moderate levels best for ad memory and attitude toward the ad. Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 61–71.
(2008). Product placement scrutinized. Television Week, 27, 1–20.
(2013). PP for ‘product placement’ or ‘puzzled public’? International Journal of Advertising, 32, 419–442.
(2012). Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18, 39–53.
(2010). How media factors affect audience responses to brand placement. International Journal of Advertising, 29, 279–302.
(2013). The effects of brand placement disclosures on skepticism and brand memory. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 38, 127–146.
(2008). An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27, 34–44.
(2010). The moderating effect of manipulative intent and cognitive resources on the evaluation of narrative ads. Psychology & Marketing, 27, 510–530.
(2008). Social utility theory: Guiding labeling of VNRs as ethical and effective public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20, 231–249.
(2003). Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analytic synthesis of forewarning of influence appeals. Psychology Bulletin, 129, 119–138.
(2005). The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24, 222–233.
(1994). Research notes: The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 22, 59–70.
(1998). A heuristic-systematic processing analysis of the effectiveness of product warning labels. Psychology & Marketing, 15, 621–642.
(2003). Strategies for resisting persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 145–161.
