Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Short Research Article

Impact of Context Information on Metaphor Elaboration

A Diffusion Model Study

Published Online:January 14, 2019https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000422

Abstract

Abstract. In experiments by Gibbs, Kushner, and Mills (1991), sentences were supposedly either authored by poets or by a computer. Gibbs et al. (1991) concluded from their results that the assumed source of the text influences speed of processing, with a higher speed for metaphorical sentences in the Poet condition. However, the dependent variables used (e.g., mean RTs) do not allow clear conclusions regarding processing speed. It is also possible that participants had prior biases before the presentation of the stimuli. We conducted a conceptual replication and applied the diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) to disentangle a possible effect on processing speed from a prior bias. Our results are in accordance with the interpretation by Gibbs et al. (1991): The context information affected processing speed, not a priori decision settings. Additionally, analyses of model fit revealed that the diffusion model provided a good account of the data of this complex verbal task.

References

  • Arnold, N. R., Bröder, A. & Bayen, U. J. (2015). Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods. Psychological Research, 79, 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0608-y First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Bambini, V., Resta, D. & Grimaldi, M. (2014). A dataset of metaphors from the Italian literature: Exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context. PLoS One, 9, e105634. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105634 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Bergmann, M. (1982). Metaphorical assertions. The Philosophical Review, 91, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184628 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blasko, D. G. (1999). Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1675–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00009-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boswell, D. A. (1986). Speakers’ intentions: Constraints on metaphor comprehension. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 1, 153–170. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chiappe, D. L. & Chiappe, P. (2007). The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Christmann, U. & Groeben, N. (2013). Zwischen Skylla und Charybdis: kognitionspsychologische Ansätze der Metapher [Between Skylla and Charybdis: Approaches to metaphor processing from the perspective of cognitive psychology]. In D. WieserM. LessingEds., Zugänge zu Metaphern – Übergänge durch Metaphern. Aktuelle forschungspragmatische und theoretische Ansätze (pp. 145–160). Paderborn, Germany: Verlag Wilhelm Fink. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Christmann, U., Wimmer, L. & Groeben, N. (2011). The aesthetic paradox in processing conventional and non-conventional metaphors: A reaction time study. Scientific study of Literature, 1, 199–240. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S. D., Cassey, P., Evans, N. J., Grasman, R. P. P. P., … Donkin, C. (2018). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.3758/16.6.1026 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Germar, M., Schlemmer, A., Krug, K., Voss, A. & Mojzisch, A. (2014). Social influence and perceptual decision making: A diffusion model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213508985 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, R. W. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0803_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies, 34, 457–486. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Metaphor and thought. In R. W. GibbsEd., The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–14). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gibbs, R. W. & Gerrig, R. J. (1989). How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special”. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 4, 145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0403_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, R. W., Kushner, J. M. & Mills, W. R. (1991). Authorial intentions and metaphor comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01076917 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, R. W. & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language, 21, 379–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00283.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Giora, R. (2003). On our mind. Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. OrtonyA. OrtonyEds., Metaphor and thought (pp. 401–424). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gomez, P., Perea, M. & Ratcliff, R. (2013). A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: Are they qualitatively different? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1731–1740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032333 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R. & Childers, R. (2015). Pointing, looking at, and pressing keys: A diffusion model account of response modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039653 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. ColeEd., Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hanks, T. D., Mazurek, M. E., Kiani, R., Hopp, E. & Shadlen, M. N. (2011). Elapsed decision time affects the weighting of prior probability in a perceptual decision task. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 6339–6352. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5613-10.2011 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Heathcote, A., Lin, Y., Reynolds, A., Strickland, L., Gretton, M. & Matzke, D. (2018). Dynamic models of choice. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hillert, D. & Swinney, D. (2001). The processing of fixed expressions during sentence comprehension. In A. J. CienkiB. J. LukaM. B. SmithEds., Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp. 107–122). Stanford, CA: CSLI. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Inhoff, A. W., Lima, S. D. & Carroll, P. J. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory & Cognition, 12, 558–567. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213344 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Johnson, A. T. (1996). Comprehension of metaphors and similes: A reaction time study. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 11, 145–159. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kazmerski, V. A., Blasko, D. G. & Dessalegn, B. G. (2003). ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 31, 673–689. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196107 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F. & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.353 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Leezenberg, M. (2001). Contexts of metaphor. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leite, F. P. & Ratcliff, R. (2011). What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 651–687. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lerche, V. & Voss, A. (2016). Model complexity in diffusion modeling: Benefits of making the model more parsimonious. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1324). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01324 First citation in articleMedline, Google Scholar

  • Lerche, V. & Voss, A. (2017a). Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0945-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lerche, V. & Voss, A. (2017b). Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model. Psychological Research, 81, 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0770-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Lerche, V., Voss, A. & Nagler, M. (2017). How many trials are required for parameter estimation in diffusion modeling? A comparison of different optimization criteria. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 513–537. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0740-2 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Metin, B., Roeyers, H., Wiersema, J. R., van der Meere, J. J., Thompson, M. & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2013). ADHD performance reflects inefficient but not impulsive information processing: A diffusion model analysis. Neuropsychology, 27, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031533 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Moustafa, A. A., Kéri, S., Somlai, Z., Balsdon, T., Frydecka, D., Misiak, B. & White, C. (2015). Drift diffusion model of reward and punishment learning in schizophrenia: Modeling and experimental data. Behavioural Brain Research, 291, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.024 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Mueller, C. J. & Kuchinke, L. (2016). Individual differences in emotion word processing: A diffusion model analysis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 489–501. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0408-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E. & Antos, S. J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 465–478. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ortony, A., Vondruska, R. J., Foss, M. A. & Jones, L. E. (1985). Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90047-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pickering, M. J. & Frisson, S. (2001). Processing ambiguous verbs: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 556–573. First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. & Frank, M. J. (2012). Reinforcement-based decision making in corticostriatal circuits: Mutual constraints by neurocomputational and diffusion models. Neural Computation, 24, 1186–1229. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO_a_00270 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P. & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.159 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. (2015). Aging effects in item and associative recognition memory for pictures and words. Psychology and Aging, 30(3), 669–674. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000030 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00067 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D. & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20, 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P. & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.278 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A. & McKoon, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychology and Aging, 16, 323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.323 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A. & McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 523–535. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194580 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A. & McKoon, G. (2007). Application of the diffusion model to two-choice tasks for adults 75–90 years old. Psychology and Aging, 22, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.56 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A. & McKoon, G. (2011). Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023810 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T. & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.261 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M. & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Schmitz, F. & Voss, A. (2012). Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 222–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026003 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Schmitz, F. & Voss, A. (2014). Components of task switching: A closer look at task switching and cue switching. Acta Psychologica, 151, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.009 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Schubert, A.-L., Hagemann, D., Voss, A., Schankin, A. & Bergmann, K. (2015). Decomposing the relationship between mental speed and mental abilities. Intelligence, 51, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.05.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spaniol, J., Madden, D. J. & Voss, A. (2006). A diffusion model analysis of adult age differences in episodic and semantic long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.101 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Spaniol, J., Voss, A. & Grady, C. L. (2008). Aging and emotional memory: Cognitive mechanisms underlying the positivity effect. Psychology and Aging, 23, 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014218 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language, 17, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. W. Gibbs JrEd., The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 84–105). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spotorno, N. & Noveck, I. A. (2014). When is irony effortful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1649–1665. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036630 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Thapar, A., Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. Psychology and Aging, 18, 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.415 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Ravenzwaaij, D., Donkin, C. & Vandekerckhove, J. (2016). The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1081-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Ravenzwaaij, D., Mulder, M. J., Tuerlinckx, F. & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2012). Do the dynamics of prior information depend on task context? An analysis of optimal performance and an empirical test. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00132 First citation in articleMedline, Google Scholar

  • Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F. & Lee, M. D. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychological Methods, 16, 44. First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • von Stockhausen, L. & Christmann, U. (2015). Die Verarbeitung konventioneller und unkoventioneller Metaphern: Eine Blickbewegungsstudie [The processing of conventional and non-conventional metaphors: An eye-movement study]. In C. SpießK.-M. KöpckeEds., Metapher und Metonymie. Theoretische, methodische und empirische Zugänge (pp. 355–372). Berlin: De Gruyter. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voss, A., Lerche, V., Mertens, U. & Voss, J. (2018). Sequential sampling models with variable boundaries and non-normal noise: A comparison of six models. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voss, A., Nagler, M. & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction. Experimental Psychology (60, 385–402). https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000218 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Voss, A., Rothermund, K. & Brandtstädter, J. (2008). Interpreting ambiguous stimuli: Separating perceptual and judgmental biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1048–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp. 2007.10.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voss, A., Rothermund, K. & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1206–1220. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196893 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Voss, A. & Voss, J. (2007). Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 767–775. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192967 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Voss, A. & Voss, J. (2008). A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp. 2007.09.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voss, A., Voss, J. & Lerche, V. (2015). Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: A tutorial based on fast-dm-30. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00336 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 641–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802205067 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P. & McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • White, C. N. & Poldrack, R. A. (2014). Decomposing bias in different types of simple decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034851 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M. W. & McKoon, G. (2010). Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.01.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I. & Frank, M. J. (2013). HDDM: Hierarchical bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00014 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Williams, J. N. (1992). Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence for interrelated meanings. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 193–218. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wimmer, L., Christmann, U. & Ihmels, E. (2016). Non-conventional figurative language as aesthetic of everyday communication. Metaphor and the Social World, 6, 243–275. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.2.04wim First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar