The Role of Visual Distractors in the Simon Effect
Abstract
Abstract. The Simon effect lies on the automatic generation of a stimulus spatial code, which, however, is not relevant for performing the task. Results typically show faster performance when stimulus and response locations correspond, rather than when they do not. Considering reaction time distributions, two types of Simon effect have been individuated, which are thought to depend on different mechanisms: visuomotor activation versus cognitive translation of spatial codes. The present study aimed to investigate whether the presence of a distractor, which affects the allocation of attentional resources and, thus, the time needed to generate the spatial code, changes the nature of the Simon effect. In four experiments, we manipulated the presence and the characteristics of the distractor. Findings extend previous evidence regarding the distinction between visuomotor activation and cognitive translation of spatial stimulus codes in a Simon task. They are discussed with reference to the attentional model of the Simon effect.
References
2011). The initial stage of visual selection is controlled by top-down task set: New ERP evidence. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 113–122.
(2007). Response coding and visuomotor transformation in the Simon task: The role of action goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1269–1282.
(2017). Visual versus auditory Simon effect: A behavioural and physiological investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1307429
(1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.
(1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.
(1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268.
(2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.
(2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 143–148.
(2014).
(Load theory of attention and cognitive control . In S. KastnerA. C. NobreEds., Handbook of attention (pp. 56–75). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.2009). The Simon effect with conventional signals. A time-course analysis. Experimental Psychology, 56, 219–227.
(2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 242–266.
(2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principle: Data theory, and application. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
(1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.
(1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40.
(1994).
(Space and selective attention . In C. UmiltaM. MoscovitchEds., Attention and performance XV (pp. 231–265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1353
(1976). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stage of processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 16–22.
(1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
(1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285–310.
(1990).
(Spatial stimulus-response compatibility . In R. W. ProctorT. G. ReeveEds., Stimulus response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89–116). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: Different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96, B33–B43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.009
(2005). The timing of stimulus localisation and the Simon effect: An ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 163, 430–439.
(2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731–751.
(2007). Response coding in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 71, 401–410.
(