Mental Numerosity Line in the Human’s Approximate Number System
Abstract
Abstract. Previous studies have demonstrated existence of a mental line for symbolic numbers (e.g., Arabic digits). For nonsymbolic number systems, however, it remains unresolved whether a spontaneous spatial layout of numerosity exists. The current experiment investigated whether SNARC-like (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes) effects exist in approximate processing of numerosity, as well as of size and density. Participants were asked to judge whether two serially presented stimuli (i.e., dot arrays, pentagons) were the same regarding numbers of dots, sizes of the pentagon, or densities of dots. Importantly, two confounds that were overlooked by most previous studies were controlled in this study: no ordered numerosity was presented, and only numerosity in the approximate number system (beyond the subitizing range) was used. The results demonstrated that there was a SNARC-like effect only in the numerosity-matching task. The results suggest that numerosity could be spontaneously aligned to a left-to-right oriented mental line according to magnitude information in human’s approximate number system.
References
(2007). Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish. Animal Cognition, 10, 63–70. doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0036-5
(2009). Use of number by fish. PLoS One, 4, e4786. doi: 10.1371/Journal.Pone.0004786
(2014). Separate mechanisms for perception of numerosity and density. Psychological Science, 25, 265–270. doi: 10.1177/0956797613501520
(1998). Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science, 282, 746–749. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.746
(2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12, 238–243. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00342
(2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 364, 1831–1840. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0028
(2015). Small on the left, large on the right: Numbers orient visual attention onto space in preverbal infants. Developmental Science, 19, 1–8. doi: 10.1111/desc.12315
(2014). Are numbers, size, and brightness equally efficient in orienting visual attention? Evidence from an eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 9, e99499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099499
(1999). The mathematical brain. London, UK: Macmillan.
(2008). Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. Progress in Neurobiology, 84, 132–147. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.11.001
(2014). Human infants’ preference for left-to-right oriented increasing numerical sequences. PLoS One, 9, e96412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096412
(2010). Number-space mapping in human infants. Psychological Science, 21, 653–660. doi: 10.1177/0956797610366091
(2012). Explaining school mathematics performance from symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude processing: Similarities and differences between typical and low-achieving children. Psychology & Neuroscience, 5(1), 37.
(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology – General, 122, 371–396. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
(2014). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) map number onto space. Cognition, 132, 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.011
(1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95–110.
(2005).
Spatial representation of numbers . In J. I. D. CampbellEd., Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 43–54). New York, NY: Psychology Press.(2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556.
(2010). How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial-numerical associations. Brain and Cognition, 72, 333–336. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.10.010
(2014). Spatial associations in numerical cognition – From single digits to arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1461–1483.
(2013). ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: Contributions of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 16, 136–148. doi: 10.1111/desc.12013
(1880). Visualised numerals. Nature, 21, 494–495. doi: 10.2307/2841651
(2011). Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 981–986. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0097-5
(2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668. doi: 10.1038/nature07246
(2014). The impact of mathematical proficiency on the number-space association. PLoS One, 9, e85048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085048
(2011). Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1222–1229. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0154-1
(2012). Prosimian primates show ratio dependence in spontaneous quantity discriminations. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00550
(2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8–9-year-old students. Cognition, 93, 99–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004
(2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189–1207.
(2012). The spatial representation of non-symbolic numerical quantities. Proceedings of Fechner Day, 28, 321–327.
(2012). Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: Evidence using a neural overlap paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1945–1961. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.673631
(2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208.
(2002). Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 297, 1708–1711.
(2005). The universal SNARC effect: The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187–194. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.187
(2011). How numbers bias preschoolers’ spatial search. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 682–695. doi: 10.1177/0022022111406098
(2010). Early development of spatial-numeric associations: Evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Developmental Science, 13, 761–771. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00934.x
(2015). How to rapidly construct a spatial-numerical representation in preliterate children (at least temporarily). Developmental Science, 19, 126–144. doi: 10.1111/desc.12296
(2012). The spatial-numerical congruity effect in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 534–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.09.006
(2011). Size matters: Non-numerical magnitude affects the spatial coding of response. PLoS One, 6, e23553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023553
(2009). Arithmetic in newborn chicks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 276, 2451–2460. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0044
(2010). Is it only humans that count from left to right? Biology Letters, 6, 290–292. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0960
(2015). Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line. Science, 347, 534–536. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1379
(2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004
(2006). Breaking ranks: Space and number may march to the beat of a different drum. Cortex, 42, 1124–1127. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70224-7
(2012). Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 344–357. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02048.x
(2013). Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number-space mappings: What underlies mathematics achievement? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 418–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.012
(1980). Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology, 30, 509.
(2008). Reading space into numbers – A cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108, 590–599. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.001
(2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328–331. doi: 10.3758/Pbr.16.2.328
(2012). SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: Instructional and cultural dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 515–530. doi: 10.1037/a0026729
(1980). Perception of numbers by human infants. Science, 210, 1033–1035.
(2013). Infants show ratio-dependent number discrimination regardless of set size. Infancy, 18, 927–941. doi: 10.1111/infa.12008
(2013). Visual stimulus parameters seriously compromise the measurement of approximate number system acuity and comparative effects between adults and children. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00444
(2012). Is there a spatial representation of non-symbolic numerical quantities? Perception ECVP abstract, 41, 144.
(2015). Time, number, and attention in very low birth weight children. Neuropsychologia, 73, 60–69.
(1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331–351. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.331
(1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently – A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102.
(2003). Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: Rudiments of number in an amphibian. Animal Cognition, 6, 105–112. doi: 10.1007/s10071-003-0167-x
(2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119, 114–119. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.013
(2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488.
(2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525.
(1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749–750.
(2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and in Arabic monoliterates, biliterates and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 165–190. doi: 10.1163/1568537054068660
(2008). Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task. Cognition, 106, 1525–1536. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.003
(2015).
When and why numerosity processing is associated with developmental dyscalculia . In S. ChinnEd., The Routledge international handbook of dyscalculia and mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 78–89). New York, NY: Routledge.(2015). Visual perception can account for the close relation between numerosity processing and computational fluency. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1364. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01364
(2002). Brain damage – Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139. doi: 10.1038/417138a
