Abstract
Analyzing RT distributions in the Simon task reveals that congruency effects decrease for the longest RTs. Four experiments were carried out to examine whether this decrease of the congruency effect with response speed was under a top-down control or due to bottom-up mechanisms. We specifically manipulated the availability of attentional resources by requiring participants to perform a Simon task concurrently to different secondary tasks. RT distribution analysis (in particular delta functions) was performed under both single-task and dual-task conditions. Results show that the reduction of the interference effect with time could be affected when the Simon task was performed concurrently with a secondary task. Nonetheless, the type of the secondary task seems to be a critical factor. Therefore, the data suggest that the mechanisms responsible for the reduction of the interference effect with time are under some attentional control but the exact nature of these mechanisms remains to be explored.
References
2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330–343.
(1997). Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and non temporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1118–1140.
(2001). Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: Implications for internal clock models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 195–205.
(2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–336.
(2005). Dynamics facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 619–641.
(1997). Effects of attention manipulation on perceived duration and intensity in the visual modality. Memory & Cognition, 25, 812–818.
(1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.
(2006). The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 291–395.
(2002). Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 527–545.
(1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427–439.
(1977). Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing. The American Journal of Psychology, 90, 431–446.
(1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268.
(2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136, 189–202.
(2013). Evidence for strategic suppression of irrelevant activation in the Simon task. Acta Psychologica, 144, 166–172.
(1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130–135.
(1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22, 673–686.
(2005). Testing the boudary conditions for processing irrelevant location information: The cross-task Simon effect. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 708–726.
(2006). Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions. Psychological research, 70, 459–467.
(1979). On the economy of the processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.
(1987). The role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435–448.
(1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.
(1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826–842.
(1994). Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 185–195.
(1995). Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information. Acta Psychologica, 90, 275–286.
(1979). Group reaction time distribution and analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.
(2002a). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. PrinzB. HommelEds., Attention & Performance, Vol. XIX, (pp. 494–519). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2002b). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312–323.
(2005). Distribution-analytical techniques in the study of ADHD: Delta plot analyses reveal deficits in response suppression that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 197–215.
(2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12, 101–108.
(2012). Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 555–574.
(1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 1974–1976.
(1990). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. M. ProctorT. G. ReeveEds., Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31–88). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
(2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.
(1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 353–367.
(1991). Programming response duration in a precueing reaction time paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 226–234.
(1912). The function of the vibrissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs, 1, 1–181.
(2007). On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review, 114, 830–841.
(2005). On the relation between the mean and the variance of a diffusion model response time distribution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 195–204.
(1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. NickersonEd., Attention and performance XIII (pp. 239–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. ParasuramanD. R. DaviesEds., Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). New York, NY: Academic Press.
(1983). Compatibility and resource competition between modalities of input, output, and central processing. Human Factors, 25, 227–248.
(1970). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill Book.
(2010). Subthalamic nucleus stimulation influences expression and suppression of impulsive behavior in Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 133, 3611–3624.
(