The Effect of a Preceding Cue on the Conflict Solving Mechanism
Abstract
In everyday life cues and signs are used in order to improve our performance and to modify and control our behavior. This study examines whether cues can improve the performance of the mental mechanism in charge of solving conflicts when the nature of the irrelevant task remains constant. In two experiments participants performed the Stroop task in which they were asked to name the color of a stimulus while ignoring its meaning. Half the trials were preceded by a conflict-cue containing information about an upcoming conflict. In addition, conflict trial proportions were manipulated. We found that only when the probability of conflict is low can cues alter the conflict solving mechanism. These findings are discussed in the context of the nature of the control mechanism and its tendency to minimize the cost of mental resources.
References
(2008). Anticipatory activity in anterior cingulate cortex can be independent of conflict and error likelihood. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 4671–4678.
(1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In , Attention and performance, Vol. XV, (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
(2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106–113.
(2012). Converging evidence for control of color–word Stroop interference at the item level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0029145
(2000). Parsing executive processes: Strategic versus evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97, 1944–1948.
(2004). A systems-level perspective on attention and cognitive control: Guided activation, adaptive gating, conflict monitoring, and exploitation vs. exploration. In , Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 71–90). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332–361.
(1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211–1214.
(2001). Facilitation and inhibition mechanisms of human visuospatial attention in a non-search task. Neuroscience Letters, 298, 45–48.
(2000). Is attentional focusing an inhibitory process at distractor location? Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 185–188.
(2008). Cognitive Control: Dynamic, Sustained, and Voluntary Influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 340–355.
(2006). New data analysis of the stroop matching task calls for a theory reevaluation. Psychological Science, 17, 96–100.
(2007). The Cause of the Within Language Stroop Superiority Effect and its Implications. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 179–185.
(1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506.
(2001). Type 2 diabetes and cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly women. Diabetes Care, 24, 1060–1065.
(2006). Constrained optimization in human running. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 622–632.
(1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268.
(2000). Cognitive performance is associated with glucose regulation in healthy elderly persons and can be enhanced with glucose and dietary carbohydrates. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 825–836.
(2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026.
(2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 665–682.
(1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523–553.
(1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166–174.
(1982). Constraints on strategy construction in a speeded discrimination task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 502–520.
(2000). Dissociating the role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1837.
(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
(2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88–125.
(1935). Studies in interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–661.
(1969). Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282–299.
(1969). The Stroop test: Selective attention to colours and words. Nature, 222, 437–439.
(1992). Controlling Stroop effect by manipulating expectations for color related stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727–735.
(1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 26, 435–444.
(2008). Pre-cueing spatial S-R correspondence: Is there regulation of expected response conflict? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 872–883.
